Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jul;36(7S):S70-S79. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.12.057. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
Despite the increased use of dual mobility (DM) in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), debate exists regarding the indications for its use. No specific algorithm exists to guide this decision-making process. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to summarize the currently available literature regarding the use of DM in primary THA and provide evidence-based guidelines based on specific patient populations and risk factors for instability.
We reviewed the current literature for studies evaluating risk factors for dislocation in primary THA, as well as the clinical use and results of DM in primary THA. Based on the strength of the literature, we discuss the use of DM in specific patient populations. We provide a decision-making algorithm to determine whether a patient may be indicated for DM in primary THA.
Surgeons should consider preoperative patient demographics, risk factors for instability (eg, significant hip-spine issues), type of procedure to be performed (eg, conversion arthroplasty), and indications for surgery (eg, THA for femoral neck fracture). Based on this algorithmic assessment, DM may be warranted in the primary THA setting if a patient's combined risk reaches an established threshold based on the literature.
This evidence-based algorithm may help guide current practice in the use of DM in primary THA. We advocate the continued judicious use of DM in hip arthroplasty. Longer term studies are needed in order to evaluate the durability of DM, as well as any complications related to the DM articulation.
尽管在初次全髋关节置换术(THA)中越来越多地使用双动(DM),但对于其使用的适应证仍存在争议。目前尚无特定的算法来指导这一决策过程。因此,本文的目的是总结目前关于 DM 在初次 THA 中应用的文献,并根据不稳定的特定患者人群和危险因素提供基于循证的指南。
我们回顾了评估初次 THA 中脱位危险因素的现有文献,以及 DM 在初次 THA 中的临床应用和结果。根据文献的强度,我们讨论了 DM 在特定患者人群中的应用。我们提供了一个决策算法,以确定患者是否适合初次 THA 中的 DM。
外科医生应考虑术前患者的人口统计学特征、不稳定的危险因素(例如,显著的髋关节-脊柱问题)、要进行的手术类型(例如,转换关节成形术)以及手术适应证(例如,股骨颈骨折的 THA)。根据该算法评估,如果患者的综合风险根据文献达到既定阈值,则在初次 THA 中可能需要 DM。
该循证算法可帮助指导目前在初次 THA 中使用 DM 的实践。我们主张在髋关节置换术中继续审慎使用 DM。需要进行更长时间的研究,以评估 DM 的耐用性以及与 DM 关节有关的任何并发症。