Xiamen Qingdun Fitness Management Co., Ltd., Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Phys Ther. 2021 Jul 1;101(7). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab046.
Strength training as a form of exercise therapy has long been used to maintain or promote strength, but its effectiveness as a treatment intervention in chronic ankle instability (CAI) is not fully understood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of strength training compared with no exercise and neuromuscular control training on balance and self-reported function in people with CAI.
Eight databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EBSCO, PEDro, CNKI, and WanFang) were searched in June 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving strength training conducted on individuals with CAI were included. Data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers using a standardized form. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed by using the PEDro Scale. In addition, the GRADE evaluation system (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) was used to determine the strength of evidence. A total of 554 studies were initially screened, resulting in a final selection of 11 RCTs involving 428 participants, and 8 RCTs were included in the final meta-analysis. Compared with no exercise, strength training demonstrated some benefits in the Star Excursion Balance Test (anterior: weighted mean difference [WMD] = 2.39, 95% CI = 0.60-4.18; posteromedial: WMD = 3.30, 95% CI = 0.24-6.35; posterolateral: WMD = 2.97, 95% CI = 0.37-5.57), but these intervention results did not reach the minimal detectable change values.
Available evidence showed that, compared with controls, strength training did not produce any minimal detectable changes on Star Excursion Balance Test or Foot and Ankle Ability Measure scores in individuals with CAI. Clinicians should use strength training cautiously for improving balance and symptoms in CAI.
The results of this study may have an impact on selecting effective physical therapy interventions for managing symptoms associated with CAI.
力量训练作为一种运动疗法,长期以来一直被用于维持或增强力量,但它在慢性踝关节不稳定(CAI)中的治疗效果尚不完全清楚。本研究旨在评估力量训练与无运动和神经肌肉控制训练相比,对 CAI 患者平衡和自我报告功能的影响。
2020 年 6 月,检索了 8 个数据库(PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、EBSCO、PEDro、CNKI 和万方)。纳入了针对 CAI 患者进行的力量训练的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用标准化表格由 2 位独立评审员提取数据。使用 PEDro 量表评估方法学质量和偏倚风险。此外,使用 GRADE 评价系统(推荐评估、制定与评价)来确定证据强度。共初步筛选了 554 项研究,最终选择了 11 项 RCT 纳入 428 名参与者,最终有 8 项 RCT 纳入荟萃分析。与无运动相比,力量训练在星状偏移平衡测试(前向:加权均数差[WMD] = 2.39,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.60-4.18;后内侧:WMD = 3.30,95%CI = 0.24-6.35;后外侧:WMD = 2.97,95%CI = 0.37-5.57)中显示出一些益处,但这些干预结果并未达到最小可检测变化值。
现有证据表明,与对照组相比,力量训练并未使 CAI 患者的星状偏移平衡测试或足踝能力测量评分产生任何最小可检测变化。临床医生在使用力量训练治疗 CAI 相关症状时应谨慎。
本研究结果可能会影响选择有效物理治疗干预措施来管理 CAI 相关症状。