Department of Cardiology, Xijing Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Department of Cardiology, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland.
Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 Oct;110(10):1543-1553. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01802-x. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
Coronary bypass artery grafting (CABG) has a higher procedural risk of stroke than percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but may offer better long-term survival. The optimal revascularization strategy for patients with prior cerebrovascular disease (CEVD) remains unclear.
The SYNTAXES study assessed the vital status out to 10 year of patients with three-vessel disease and/or left main coronary artery disease enrolled in the SYNTAX trial. The relative efficacy of PCI vs. CABG in terms of 10 year all-cause death was assessed according to prior CEVD. The primary endpoint was 10 year all-cause death. The status of prior CEVD was available in 1791 (99.5%) patients, of whom 253 patients had prior CEVD. Patients with prior CEVD were older and had more comorbidities (medically treated diabetes, insulin-dependent diabetes, metabolic syndrome, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, impaired renal function, and congestive heart failure), compared with those without prior CEVD. Prior CEVD was an independent predictor of 10 year all-cause death (adjusted HR: 1.35; 95% CI: 1.04-1.73; p = 0.021). Patients with prior CEVD had a significantly higher risk of 10 year all-cause death (41.1 vs. 24.1%; HR: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.54-2.40; p < 0.001). The risk of 10 year all-cause death was similar between patients receiving PCI or CABG irrespective of the presence of prior CEVD (p = 0.624).
Prior CEVD was associated with a significantly increased risk of 10 year all-cause death which was similar in patients treated with PCI or CABG. These results do not support preferential referral for PCI rather than CABG in patients with prior CEVD.
SYNTAX: ClinicalTrials.gov reference: NCT00114972. SYNTAX Extended Survival: ClinicalTrials.gov reference: NCT03417050.
与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)相比,冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的中风程序风险更高,但可能提供更好的长期生存。患有脑血管疾病(CEVD)的患者的最佳血运重建策略仍不清楚。
SYNTAXES 研究评估了 SYNTAX 试验中患有三支血管疾病和/或左主干冠状动脉疾病的患者在 10 年时的存活情况。根据先前的 CEVD,评估了 PCI 与 CABG 在 10 年全因死亡方面的相对疗效。主要终点是 10 年全因死亡。1791 名(99.5%)患者中有 253 名患者有先前的 CEVD,先前 CEVD 的情况可用。与没有先前 CEVD 的患者相比,有先前 CEVD 的患者年龄更大,合并症更多(药物治疗的糖尿病、胰岛素依赖型糖尿病、代谢综合征、外周血管疾病、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、肾功能受损和充血性心力衰竭)。先前的 CEVD 是 10 年全因死亡的独立预测因素(调整后的 HR:1.35;95%CI:1.04-1.73;p=0.021)。有先前 CEVD 的患者 10 年全因死亡的风险显著升高(41.1% vs. 24.1%;HR:1.92;95%CI:1.54-2.40;p<0.001)。无论是否存在先前的 CEVD,接受 PCI 或 CABG 的患者的 10 年全因死亡风险相似(p=0.624)。
先前的 CEVD 与 10 年全因死亡风险显著增加相关,而 PCI 或 CABG 治疗的患者风险相似。这些结果不支持在患有先前 CEVD 的患者中优先选择 PCI 而不是 CABG。
SYNTAX:ClinicalTrials.gov 参考号:NCT00114972。SYNTAX 扩展生存:ClinicalTrials.gov 参考号:NCT03417050。