骨科手术中的透视影像学可视化:头戴式显示器与传统监视器比较。

Visualization of Fluoroscopic Imaging in Orthopedic Surgery: Head-Mounted Display vs Conventional Monitor.

机构信息

The American Sports Medicine Institute, Birmingham, AL, USA.

The Och Spine Hospital at Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Surg Innov. 2022 Jun;29(3):353-359. doi: 10.1177/1553350620987978. Epub 2021 Jan 31.

Abstract

. See-through head-mounted displays (HMDs) can be used to view fluoroscopic imaging during orthopedic surgical procedures. The goals of this study were to determine whether HMDs reduce procedure time, number of fluoroscopic images required, or number of head turns by the surgeon compared with standard monitors. . Sixteen orthopedic surgery residents each performed fluoroscopy-guided drilling of 8 holes for placement of tibial nail distal interlocking screws in an anatomical model, with 4 holes drilled while using HMD and 4 holes drilled while using a standard monitor. Procedure time, number of fluoroscopic images needed, and number of head turns by the resident during the procedure were compared between the 2 modalities. Statistical significance was set at < .05. . Mean (SD) procedure time did not differ significantly between attempts using the standard monitor (55 [37] seconds) vs the HMD (56 [31] seconds) ( = .73). Neither did mean number of fluoroscopic images differ significantly between attempts using the standard monitor vs the HMD (9 [5] images for each) ( = .84). Residents turned their heads significantly more times when using the standard monitor (9 [5] times) vs the HMD (1 [2] times) ( < .001). . Head-mounted displays lessened the need for residents to turn their heads away from the surgical field while drilling holes for tibial nail distal interlocking screws in an anatomical model; however, there was no difference in terms of procedure time or number of fluoroscopic images needed using the HMD compared with the standard monitor.

摘要

透视头戴式显示器 (HMD) 可用于在骨科手术过程中查看透视成像。本研究的目的是确定与标准监视器相比,HMD 是否可以减少手术时间、透视图像数量或外科医生的转头次数。 16 名骨科手术住院医师在解剖模型上分别进行了 8 个胫骨钉远端锁定螺钉透视引导钻孔,4 个孔使用 HMD 进行钻孔,4 个孔使用标准监视器进行钻孔。比较了两种模式下手术过程中住院医师的手术时间、所需透视图像数量和转头次数。统计学意义设为 <.05。 使用标准监视器(55 [37] 秒)与 HMD(56 [31] 秒)时,平均(SD)手术时间无显著差异( =.73)。使用标准监视器与 HMD 时,平均透视图像数量也无显著差异(各 9 [5] 张)( =.84)。使用标准监视器时,住院医师转头的次数明显多于使用 HMD(标准监视器为 9 [5] 次,HMD 为 1 [2] 次)( <.001)。 使用 HMD 时,与标准监视器相比,在解剖模型上钻孔时,住院医师无需将头从手术区域转开,从而减少了对 HMD 的需求;但是,使用 HMD 与标准监视器相比,手术时间或所需透视图像数量没有差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索