Prendergast Christopher J, Ryder Beth A, Abodeely Adam, Muratore Christopher S, Crawford Gregory P, Luks Francois I
Department of Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009 Apr;19 Suppl 1:S237-40. doi: 10.1089/lap.2008.0142.supp.
The difficulties of laparoscopic surgery include two-dimensional image projection and loss of alignment between the surgeon's hands and visual field. Head-mounted displays (HMDs) allow freedom from gazing at a stationary overhead monitor, thus improving ergonomics. Modern HMDs offer greatly improved image quality and reduced bulk and weight. We compared two types of HMDs with conventional overhead image display.
Twelve preclinical medical students (i.e., laparoscopic novices) completed the standardized bead-passing task in a Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery box trainer, using a wall-mounted monitor(WALL), a solid-state high-resolution dual full-visual graphic array (VGA) HMD (HIGH-HMD), or a lightweight commercial 1/4 VGA HMD (LOW-HMD). Participants performed each task by using the three image displays. The order in which they performed each test was randomly assigned to minimize the carryover effect.Students were then asked to grade comfort and image quality on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). Statistical comparison of the time per bead was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis test, and P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Average time per bead (total beads = 12/participant/test) was 14.2 seconds for WALL, 13.2 seconds for LOW-HMD, and 12.5 seconds for HIGH-HMD (P 0.05). The comfort ratings were 3.67 +/- 0.82, 3.50 +/- 1.38,and 3.83 +/- 0.75, respectively, and image quality was rated as 3.00 +/- 0.63, 2.83 +/- 1.47 and 4.67 +/- 0.52, respectively.
The high-resolution HMD offered significantly better image quality and allowed faster task performance than a lower resolution model of HMD, and both performed better than the overhead display. The high-resolution HMD was not significantly more comfortable than the low-resolution model, given its added weight. HMDs alone may only be of incremental benefit in improving performance in laparoscopic surgery.However, their greatest promise is in their combination with other advances in imaging and image manipulation technology, as they open the door to individualized image display.
腹腔镜手术的困难包括二维图像投影以及外科医生的手部与视野之间的对准性丧失。头戴式显示器(HMD)可使外科医生无需盯着固定的头顶显示器,从而改善了人体工程学。现代HMD的图像质量有了极大提高,体积和重量也有所减轻。我们将两种类型的HMD与传统的头顶图像显示进行了比较。
12名临床前医学生(即腹腔镜手术新手)在腹腔镜手术基础训练箱中完成了标准化的穿珠任务,分别使用壁挂式显示器(WALL)、固态高分辨率双全视觉图形阵列(VGA)HMD(HIGH-HMD)或轻便型商用1/4 VGA HMD(LOW-HMD)。参与者使用这三种图像显示方式完成每项任务。每项测试的执行顺序是随机分配的,以尽量减少遗留效应。然后要求学生对舒适度和图像质量进行评分,评分范围为1(最差)至5(最佳)。对每颗珠子的操作时间进行统计学比较采用Kruskal-Wallis检验,P < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
每颗珠子的平均操作时间(每位参与者/每次测试的珠子总数 = 12颗),使用WALL时为14.2秒,使用LOW-HMD时为13.2秒,使用HIGH-HMD时为12.5秒(P < 0.05)。舒适度评分分别为3.67±0.82、3.50±1.38和3.83±0.75,图像质量评分分别为3.00±0.63、2.83±1.47和4.67±0.52。
高分辨率HMD的图像质量明显更好,且与低分辨率HMD相比,任务执行速度更快,两者的表现均优于头顶显示器。鉴于其增加的重量,高分辨率HMD在舒适度上并不比低分辨率型号有显著提高。单独使用HMD在改善腹腔镜手术表现方面可能仅具有增量效益。然而其最大的前景在于与成像和图像处理技术的其他进展相结合,因为它们为个性化图像显示打开了大门。