Suppr超能文献

子宫内膜癌临床分期的评估

An evaluation of the clinical staging of endometrial cancer.

作者信息

Campbell K, Nuss R C, Benrubi G I

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Jacksonville, Florida 32209.

出版信息

J Reprod Med. 1988 Jan;33(1):8-10.

PMID:3351811
Abstract

Therapeutic approaches to endometrial cancer have traditionally been based on preoperative clinical staging. We conducted a retrospective review of 56 women with diagnoses of stage I and II endometrial cancer in order to compare preoperative clinical staging with postoperative staging based on pathologic data. We found a change in stage based on surgical findings in 41.1% of the cases. Endocervical curettage was falsely positive in 92.8% of cases. In addition, an overall change in tumor grade occurred in 39.3% of patients. Preoperative clinical staging of endometrial cancer is associated with a large margin of error when compared to surgical pathologic data.

摘要

子宫内膜癌的治疗方法传统上基于术前临床分期。我们对56例诊断为I期和II期子宫内膜癌的女性进行了回顾性研究,以比较术前临床分期与基于病理数据的术后分期。我们发现41.1%的病例根据手术结果出现了分期变化。92.8%的病例宫颈刮除术呈假阳性。此外,39.3%的患者肿瘤分级出现了总体变化。与手术病理数据相比,子宫内膜癌的术前临床分期存在较大误差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验