• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣置换术后心脏计算机断层扫描与超声心动图定义的假体-患者不匹配。

Prosthesis-patient mismatch defined by cardiac computed tomography versus echocardiography after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

机构信息

Cardiovascular Imaging Research Center and Core Lab, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Valve Science Center, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2021 Sep-Oct;15(5):403-411. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Jan 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcct.2021.01.001
PMID:33518457
Abstract

BACKGROUNDS

Evaluation of prosthesis-patient mismatch (P-PM) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) has provided conflicting results regarding its impact on outcomes. Whether post-TAVR computed tomography angiography (CTA) evaluation of P-PM can improve our understanding is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the inter-modality (TTE vs. CTA) agreement, inter-valve platform (balloon-expanding valve [BEV] vs. self-expandable valve [SEV]) differences in P-PM severity, and outcomes related to P-PM after TAVR.

METHODS

We analyzed patients with both CTA and TTE before and after TAVR. Indexed effective orifice area was calculated using two methods: TTE-derived left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) area from measured diameter and post-TAVR CTA-measured area. Body size specific cut-offs for P-PM severity were used: for body mass index (BMI) ​< ​30 ​kg/m, moderate ​= ​0.66-0.85 ​cm/m and severe≤0.65 ​cm/m; for BMI ≥30 ​kg/m, moderate ​= ​0.56-0.70 ​cm/m and severe≤0.55 ​cm/m.

RESULTS

A total of 447 patients were included (median age, 83 years; 54% male). The prevalence of P-PM (moderate or severe) was lower with CTA vs. TTE (3.5% vs. 19.5%, p ​< ​0.001). The prevalence of P-PM measured by TTE was more common in BEV compared to SEV (p ​= ​0.002), while CTA assessment showed no difference in P-PM incidence and severity between TAVR platforms (p ​= ​0.40). In multivariable analysis, CTA-defined but not TTE-defined P-PM was associated with mortality after TAVR (HR:3.97; 95%CI,1.55-10.2; p ​= ​0.004). Both CTA-defined and TTE-defined P-PM were associated with the composite of death and heart failure rehospitalization.

CONCLUSION

Although post-TAVR CTA substantially downgraded the prevalence of P-PM compared to TTE, it identified a subset of patients with clinically relevant P-PM which associated with outcomes.

摘要

背景

经胸超声心动图(TTE)评估经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后的假体-患者不匹配(P-PM)对结局的影响结果相互矛盾。术后 CT 血管造影(CTA)评估 P-PM 是否能提高我们的认识尚不清楚。我们旨在评估 TTE 与 CTA 之间的模式间(TTE 与 CTA)一致性、不同瓣膜平台(球囊扩张瓣膜 [BEV] 与自扩张瓣膜 [SEV])之间 P-PM 严重程度的差异,以及与 TAVR 后 P-PM 相关的结果。

方法

我们分析了 TAVR 前后均接受 CTA 和 TTE 检查的患者。通过两种方法计算经指数有效瓣口面积:从测量直径计算 TTE 衍生的左心室流出道(LVOT)面积和术后 CTA 测量的面积。使用特定于身体大小的 P-PM 严重程度截断值:对于 BMI<30kg/m,中度=0.66-0.85cm/m,重度≤0.65cm/m;对于 BMI≥30kg/m,中度=0.56-0.70cm/m,重度≤0.55cm/m。

结果

共纳入 447 例患者(中位年龄 83 岁,54%为男性)。与 TTE 相比,CTA 显示 P-PM(中度或重度)的患病率较低(3.5%比 19.5%,p<0.001)。TTE 测量的 P-PM 患病率在 BEV 中比 SEV 更常见(p=0.002),而 CTA 评估显示两种 TAVR 平台之间 P-PM 的发生率和严重程度没有差异(p=0.40)。多变量分析显示,CTA 定义的但不是 TTE 定义的 P-PM 与 TAVR 后死亡率相关(HR:3.97;95%CI,1.55-10.2;p=0.004)。CTA 定义和 TTE 定义的 P-PM 均与死亡和心力衰竭再入院的复合终点相关。

结论

尽管 TAVR 后 CTA 与 TTE 相比大大降低了 P-PM 的患病率,但它确定了一组具有临床意义的 P-PM 患者,与结局相关。

相似文献

1
Prosthesis-patient mismatch defined by cardiac computed tomography versus echocardiography after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后心脏计算机断层扫描与超声心动图定义的假体-患者不匹配。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2021 Sep-Oct;15(5):403-411. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
2
CT-Defined Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Downgrades Frequency and Severity, and Demonstrates No Association With Adverse Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.CT 定义的假体-患者不匹配降级频率和严重程度,并且在经导管主动脉瓣置换术后与不良结局无关。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Aug 14;10(15):1578-1587. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.05.031. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
3
Geometric changes in ventriculoaortic complex after transcatheter aortic valve replacement and its association with post-procedural prosthesis-patient mismatch: an intraprocedural 3D-TEE study.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后心室-主动脉复合体的几何变化及其与术后人工瓣膜-患者不匹配的关系:一项术中三维经食管超声心动图研究
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Jan;18(1):1-10. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jew039. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
4
Echocardiographic Results of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: The PARTNER 3 Trial.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术在低危患者中的超声心动图结果:PARTNER 3 试验。
Circulation. 2020 May 12;141(19):1527-1537. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044574. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
5
Computed Tomography-Based Indexed Aortic Annulus Size to Predict Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch.基于计算机断层扫描的主动脉瓣环大小指数预测人工瓣膜-患者不匹配。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr;12(4):e007396. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007396.
6
Baseline global longitudinal strain by computed tomography is associated with post transcatheter aortic valve replacement outcomes.计算机断层扫描的基线整体纵向应变与经导管主动脉瓣置换术的预后相关。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020 May-Jun;14(3):233-239. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2019.12.002. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
7
Impact of Flow on Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Following Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术和外科主动脉瓣置换术后血流对人工瓣膜-患者不匹配的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Aug;14(8):e012364. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.120.012364. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
8
Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Aortic Valve Replacement in the PARTNER 2 Trial and Registry.PARTNER 2 试验和注册研究中主动脉瓣置换术后假体-患者不匹配。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jul 12;14(13):1466-1477. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.069.
9
Global longitudinal strain assessment by computed tomography in severe aortic stenosis patients - Feasibility using feature tracking analysis.使用特征追踪分析评估严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的 CT 心搏量-可行性。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019 Mar-Apr;13(2):157-162. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2018.10.020. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
10
Incidence, Predictors, and Clinical Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Asian Patients: The OCEAN-TAVI Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后亚洲患者假体-患者不匹配的发生率、预测因素和临床影响:OCEAN-TAVI 注册研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Apr 23;11(8):771-780. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.01.273.

引用本文的文献

1
CT-based evaluation of patient-prosthesis mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation and its influence on outcome.基于CT对经导管主动脉瓣植入术后患者-人工瓣膜不匹配的评估及其对预后的影响。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1007/s00392-025-02701-9.
2
Flow Status-Based Predicted Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With a Balloon-Expandable Valve.经导管主动脉瓣置换术使用球囊扩张瓣膜患者中基于血流状态的预测人工瓣膜-患者不匹配情况
Struct Heart. 2024 Dec 6;9(4):100379. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2024.100379. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Contemporary Multi-modality Imaging of Prosthetic Aortic Valves.
当代人工主动脉瓣的多模态成像
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jan 14;26(1):25339. doi: 10.31083/RCM25339. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
The Application of Precision Medicine in Structural Heart Diseases: A Step towards the Future.精准医学在结构性心脏病中的应用:迈向未来的一步。
J Pers Med. 2024 Mar 30;14(4):375. doi: 10.3390/jpm14040375.
5
Core Lab Adjudication of the ACURATE Hemodynamic Performance Using Computed-Tomography-Corrected Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Area.使用计算机断层扫描校正的左心室流出道面积对ACURATE血流动力学性能进行核心实验室判定。
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 17;11(20):6103. doi: 10.3390/jcm11206103.