Suppr超能文献

易受伤害的男孩:青少年劣势影响中的短期和长期性别差异

Vulnerable Boys: Short-term and Long-term Gender Differences in the Impacts of Adolescent Disadvantage.

作者信息

Lei Ziteng, Lundberg Shelly

机构信息

University of California, Santa Barbara.

出版信息

J Econ Behav Organ. 2020 Oct;178:424-448. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2020.07.020. Epub 2020 Aug 15.

Abstract

The growing gender gap in educational attainment between men and women has raised concerns that the skill development of boys may be more sensitive to family disadvantage than that of girls. Using the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health) data we find, as do previous studies, that boys are more likely to experience increased problems in school relative to girls, including suspensions and reduced educational aspirations, when they are in poor quality schools, less-educated neighborhoods, and father-absent households. Following these cohorts into young adulthood, however, we find no evidence that adolescent disadvantage has stronger negative impacts on long-run economic outcomes such as college graduation, employment, or income for men, relative to women. We do find that father absence is more strongly associated with men's marriage and childbearing and weak support for greater male vulnerability to disadvantage in rates of high school graduation. An investigation of adult outcomes for another recent cohort from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, 1997 produces a similar pattern of results. We conclude that focusing on gender differences in behavior in school may not lead to valid inferences about the effects of disadvantage on adult skills.

摘要

男性和女性在教育程度上日益扩大的性别差距引发了人们的担忧,即男孩的技能发展可能比女孩更容易受到家庭劣势的影响。利用全国青少年健康纵向研究(Add Health)的数据,我们发现,与之前的研究一样,当男孩就读于质量较差的学校、教育程度较低的社区以及父亲缺席的家庭时,相对于女孩,他们在学校遇到的问题更有可能增加,包括被停学和教育期望降低。然而,追踪这些队列进入青年期后,我们发现没有证据表明青少年时期的劣势相对于女性而言,对男性的长期经济成果(如大学毕业、就业或收入)有更强的负面影响。我们确实发现,父亲缺席与男性的婚姻和生育有更强的关联,并且对男性在高中毕业率方面更易受劣势影响的支持力度较弱。对1997年全国青年纵向调查中另一个近期队列的成人结果进行调查,也得出了类似的结果模式。我们得出结论,关注学校行为中的性别差异可能无法得出关于劣势对成人技能影响的有效推断。

相似文献

2
Educational Gender Gaps.教育领域的性别差距。
South Econ J. 2020 Oct;87(2):416-439. doi: 10.1002/soej.12460. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
5
Short-run and Long-run Effects of Peers from Disrupted Families.来自破裂家庭的同龄人的短期和长期影响。
J Popul Econ. 2022 Jul;35(3):1007-1036. doi: 10.1007/s00148-021-00839-0. Epub 2021 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

2
Males at the Tails: How Socioeconomic Status Shapes the Gender Gap.处于末端的男性:社会经济地位如何塑造性别差距
Econ J (London). 2023 Aug 25;133(656):3136-3152. doi: 10.1093/ej/uead069. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3
Short-run and Long-run Effects of Peers from Disrupted Families.来自破裂家庭的同龄人的短期和长期影响。
J Popul Econ. 2022 Jul;35(3):1007-1036. doi: 10.1007/s00148-021-00839-0. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
4
Educational Gender Gaps.教育领域的性别差距。
South Econ J. 2020 Oct;87(2):416-439. doi: 10.1002/soej.12460. Epub 2020 Oct 23.

本文引用的文献

1
The intergenerational transmission of partnering.代际伴侣关系的传递。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 13;13(11):e0205732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205732. eCollection 2018.
5
Gene-environment interaction.基因-环境交互作用。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2014;65:41-70. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115100.
6
9
Partnership status and the human sex ratio at birth.伙伴关系状况与人类出生性别比。
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Nov 22;271(1555):2403-10. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2857.
10
Child gender and the transition to marriage.儿童性别与向婚姻的转变。
Demography. 2003 May;40(2):333-49. doi: 10.1353/dem.2003.0015.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验