Lei Ziteng, Lundberg Shelly
University of California, Santa Barbara.
J Econ Behav Organ. 2020 Oct;178:424-448. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2020.07.020. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
The growing gender gap in educational attainment between men and women has raised concerns that the skill development of boys may be more sensitive to family disadvantage than that of girls. Using the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health) data we find, as do previous studies, that boys are more likely to experience increased problems in school relative to girls, including suspensions and reduced educational aspirations, when they are in poor quality schools, less-educated neighborhoods, and father-absent households. Following these cohorts into young adulthood, however, we find no evidence that adolescent disadvantage has stronger negative impacts on long-run economic outcomes such as college graduation, employment, or income for men, relative to women. We do find that father absence is more strongly associated with men's marriage and childbearing and weak support for greater male vulnerability to disadvantage in rates of high school graduation. An investigation of adult outcomes for another recent cohort from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, 1997 produces a similar pattern of results. We conclude that focusing on gender differences in behavior in school may not lead to valid inferences about the effects of disadvantage on adult skills.
男性和女性在教育程度上日益扩大的性别差距引发了人们的担忧,即男孩的技能发展可能比女孩更容易受到家庭劣势的影响。利用全国青少年健康纵向研究(Add Health)的数据,我们发现,与之前的研究一样,当男孩就读于质量较差的学校、教育程度较低的社区以及父亲缺席的家庭时,相对于女孩,他们在学校遇到的问题更有可能增加,包括被停学和教育期望降低。然而,追踪这些队列进入青年期后,我们发现没有证据表明青少年时期的劣势相对于女性而言,对男性的长期经济成果(如大学毕业、就业或收入)有更强的负面影响。我们确实发现,父亲缺席与男性的婚姻和生育有更强的关联,并且对男性在高中毕业率方面更易受劣势影响的支持力度较弱。对1997年全国青年纵向调查中另一个近期队列的成人结果进行调查,也得出了类似的结果模式。我们得出结论,关注学校行为中的性别差异可能无法得出关于劣势对成人技能影响的有效推断。