Quantification in Experimental Psychology and Pragmatic Epistemology: Tension Between the Scientific Imperative and the Social Imperative.
作者信息
Guyon Hervé
机构信息
Université de Bretagne Occidentale, AMURE Laboratory, Brest, France.
出版信息
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 13;11:603617. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.603617. eCollection 2020.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Quantification in Experimental Psychology and Pragmatic Epistemology: Tension Between the Scientific Imperative and the Social Imperative.实验心理学与实用认识论中的量化：科学要求与社会要求之间的张力
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 13;11:603617. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.603617. eCollection 2020.
2
Erratum: Quantification in experimental psychology and pragmatic epistemology: Tension between the scientific imperative and the social imperative.勘误：实验心理学与实用认识论中的量化：科学要求与社会要求之间的张力。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 8;13:1026974. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1026974. eCollection 2022.
3
Perceptual Pragmatism and the Naturalized Ontology of Color.知觉实用主义与颜色的自然化本体论
Top Cogn Sci. 2017 Jan;9(1):151-171. doi: 10.1111/tops.12222. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
4
John Anderson's development of (situational) realism and its bearing on psychology today.约翰·安德森对（情境）现实主义的发展及其对当今心理学的影响。
Hist Human Sci. 2009 Oct;22(4):63-92. doi: 10.1177/0952695109340493.
5
Replacing positivism in medical geography.取代医学地理学中的实证主义。
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Jun;60(12):2685-95. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.003. Epub 2004 Dec 22.
6
Laudan's normative naturalism: a useful philosophy of science for psychology.劳丹的规范自然主义：一种对心理学有用的科学哲学。
Am J Psychol. 2000 Fall;113(3):430-54.
7
The Positivism Paradigm of Research.研究的实证主义范式。
Acad Med. 2020 May;95(5):690-694. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003093.
8
Some historical and conceptual relations among logical positivism, operationism, and behaviorism.逻辑实证主义、操作主义和行为主义之间的一些历史与概念关系。
Behav Anal. 1985 Spring;8(1):53-63. doi: 10.1007/BF03391912.
9
Feminism and psychology: critiques of methods and epistemology.女性主义与心理学：方法与认识论批判。
Am Psychol. 2014 Oct;69(7):685-702. doi: 10.1037/a0037372. Epub 2014 Jul 21.
10
[The relationship between qualitative research and positivism].[定性研究与实证主义之间的关系]
Hu Li Za Zhi. 2008 Oct;55(5):64-8.
引用本文的文献
1
Concerns and priority outcomes for children with advanced cancer and their families in the Middle East: A cross-national qualitative study.中东地区晚期癌症儿童及其家庭的担忧与优先事项：一项跨国定性研究。
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 14;13:1120990. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1120990. eCollection 2023.
2
A model and its fit lie in the eye of the beholder: Long live the sum score.模型及其拟合效果因人而异：总评分万岁。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 13;13:986767. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.986767. eCollection 2022.
本文引用的文献
1
A pragmatist philosophy of psychological science and its implications for replication.实用主义心理学科学哲学及其对复制的影响。
Behav Brain Sci. 2018 Jan;41:e127. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X18000626.
2
Modeling Psychological Attributes in Psychology - An Epistemological Discussion: Network Analysis vs. Latent Variables.心理学中心理属性的建模——认识论探讨：网络分析与潜在变量
Front Psychol. 2017 May 18;8:798. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00798. eCollection 2017.
3
"Everybody knows psychology is not a real science": Public perceptions of psychology and how we can improve our relationship with policymakers, the scientific community, and the general public.“每个人都知道心理学不是一门真正的科学”：公众对心理学的看法以及我们如何改善与政策制定者、科学界和普通公众的关系。
Am Psychol. 2015 Sep;70(6):527-42. doi: 10.1037/a0039405.
4
The place of words and numbers in psychiatric research.言语和数字在精神病学研究中的地位。
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2013 Nov 18;8:18. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-8-18.
5
The big five personality traits: psychological entities or statistical constructs?大五人格特质：心理实体还是统计结构？
Behav Genet. 2014 Nov;44(6):591-604. doi: 10.1007/s10519-013-9625-7. Epub 2013 Oct 27.
6
Grand challenges in theoretical and philosophical psychology: after psychology?理论与哲学心理学中的重大挑战：心理学之后何去何从？
Front Psychol. 2010 Apr 16;1:9. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00009. eCollection 2010.
7
The abandonment of latent variables: philosophical considerations.放弃潜在变量：哲学思考。
Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):177-8. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10000841.
8
Variables in psychology: a critique of quantitative psychology.心理学中的变量：对量化心理学的批判
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2008 Sep;42(3):245-65. doi: 10.1007/s12124-008-9059-6. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
9
What does it mean that an issue is conceptual in nature?一个问题本质上是概念性的，这意味着什么？
J Pers Assess. 2005 Oct;85(2):128-33; discussion 141-5. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8502_04.
10
Construct validity in psychological tests.心理测试中的结构效度。
Psychol Bull. 1955 Jul;52(4):281-302. doi: 10.1037/h0040957.
Zotero 插件