• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

回收利用的人也在节约吗?成本很重要。

Are Recycling People Also Saving? Costliness Matters.

作者信息

Wei Sheng, Xu Jiaqi, She Shengxiang, Wang Yan, Zhang Ying

机构信息

School of Management, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin, China.

Center for Behavior and Decision, Shannxi University of Technology, Hanzhong, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 13;11:609371. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.609371. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.609371
PMID:33519620
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7838431/
Abstract

In view of the fact that vigorously promoting recycling has become a viable means to promote sustainable development, it is important to better understand the impact of recycling efforts on subsequent resource saving behavior. This research empirically examines the effects of recycling efforts on subsequent resource saving by analyzing the survey data of 356 college students in China. The recycling efforts, environmental self-identity and feeling of pride were measured using existing scales while saving behaviors and recycling cost were measured by developing new scales. Partial least squares structural equation modeling was performed to test the structural relationships among recycling efforts, environmental self-identity, feeling of pride, and saving behaviors. Further, the moderation role of recycling cost was tested. The results showed that (1) saving behaviors could be classified into two types based on their costliness; (2) recycling efforts have a positive effect on costless saving behaviors, while having a negative effect on costly saving behaviors; (3) both the positive and negative effect of recycling efforts on resource saving is mediated by pride feeling and environmental self-identity; and (4) recycling cost negatively moderates the effects of recycling efforts on pride feeling. We discuss the theoretical and managerial implications of the findings.

摘要

鉴于大力推广回收利用已成为促进可持续发展的可行手段,更好地理解回收努力对后续资源节约行为的影响至关重要。本研究通过分析中国356名大学生的调查数据,实证检验了回收努力对后续资源节约的影响。回收努力、环境自我认同和自豪感采用现有量表进行测量,而节约行为和回收成本则通过开发新量表进行测量。采用偏最小二乘结构方程模型来检验回收努力、环境自我认同、自豪感和节约行为之间的结构关系。此外,还检验了回收成本的调节作用。结果表明:(1)节约行为可根据成本高低分为两类;(2)回收努力对无成本节约行为有积极影响,而对有成本节约行为有消极影响;(3)回收努力对资源节约的正负效应均通过自豪感和环境自我认同来介导;(4)回收成本对回收努力与自豪感之间的关系起负向调节作用。我们讨论了研究结果的理论和管理意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0262/7838431/de03276a3388/fpsyg-11-609371-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0262/7838431/fdc3e378d7a4/fpsyg-11-609371-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0262/7838431/de03276a3388/fpsyg-11-609371-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0262/7838431/fdc3e378d7a4/fpsyg-11-609371-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0262/7838431/de03276a3388/fpsyg-11-609371-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Are Recycling People Also Saving? Costliness Matters.回收利用的人也在节约吗?成本很重要。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 13;11:609371. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.609371. eCollection 2020.
2
Will Costliness Amplify the Signalling Strength of Past Pro-Environmental Behaviour? Exploratory Study on Autonomy.高成本是否会增强过去亲环境行为的信号强度?对自主性的探索性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 28;18(19):10216. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910216.
3
Better future with better us: Exploring young people's energy-saving behavior based on norm activation theory.美好未来源于更好的我们:基于规范激活理论探究年轻人的节能行为。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 20;10:1042325. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1042325. eCollection 2022.
4
Quantifying the embodied carbon saving potential of recycling construction and demolition waste in the Greater Bay Area, China: Status quo and future scenarios.量化中国大湾区回收建筑和拆除废物的碳减排潜力:现状和未来情景。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Oct 20;792:148427. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148427. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
The Role of the Theory of Planned Behavior in Explaining the Energy-Saving Behaviors of High School Students with Physical Impairments.计划行为理论在解释身体有残疾的高中生节能行为中的作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Sep 15;12(9):334. doi: 10.3390/bs12090334.
7
An innovative environmental citizen behavior model: Recycling intention as climate change mitigation strategies.创新的环境公民行为模型:以回收利用为气候变化缓解策略的回收意愿。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Oct 1;247:499-508. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.101. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
8
What factors affect the water saving behaviors of farmers in the Loess Hilly Region of China?哪些因素影响了中国黄土丘陵区农户的节水行为?
J Environ Manage. 2021 Aug 15;292:112683. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112683. Epub 2021 May 11.
9
Health consciousness and pro-environmental behaviors in an Italian representative sample: A cross-sectional study.意大利代表性样本中的健康意识和有利于环境的行为:一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 31;13(1):8846. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35969-w.
10
Sustaining the environment through recycling: an empirical study.通过回收利用来保护环境:一项实证研究。
J Environ Manage. 2012 Jul 15;102:141-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.02.025. Epub 2012 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Waste Management Behavior Among University Students in China: Environmental Knowledge, Personal Norms, and the Theory of Planned Behavior.了解中国大学生的废物管理行为:环境知识、个人规范与计划行为理论
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 12;12:771723. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.771723. eCollection 2021.
2
Will Costliness Amplify the Signalling Strength of Past Pro-Environmental Behaviour? Exploratory Study on Autonomy.高成本是否会增强过去亲环境行为的信号强度?对自主性的探索性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 28;18(19):10216. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910216.

本文引用的文献

1
The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms: Reprise.社会规范的建设性、破坏性和重建性力量:续篇。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Mar;13(2):249-254. doi: 10.1177/1745691617693325.
2
Consistency Versus Licensing Effects of Past Moral Behavior.过去道德行为的一致性与许可效应。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:363-85. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115120. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
3
Rules or consequences? The role of ethical mind-sets in moral dynamics.规则还是后果?伦理思维模式在道德动态中的作用。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Apr;24(4):482-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797612457376. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
4
Sustaining the environment through recycling: an empirical study.通过回收利用来保护环境:一项实证研究。
J Environ Manage. 2012 Jul 15;102:141-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.02.025. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
5
Identity, morals, and taboos: beliefs as assets.身份、道德和禁忌:信仰即资产。
Q J Econ. 2011;126(2):805-55. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjr002.
6
Do green products make us better people?绿色产品能让我们变得更好吗?
Psychol Sci. 2010 Apr;21(4):494-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797610363538. Epub 2010 Mar 5.
7
Sustainable recycling of municipal solid waste in developing countries.发展中国家城市固体废物的可持续回收利用。
Waste Manag. 2009 Feb;29(2):915-23. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.04.016. Epub 2008 Jul 26.
8
Priming a new identity: self-monitoring moderates the effects of nonself primes on self-judgments and behavior.启动一个新身份:自我监控调节非自我启动对自我判断和行为的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Nov;89(5):657-71. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.657.
9
The foot-in-the-door compliance procedure: a multiple-process analysis and review.登门槛效应顺从程序:多过程分析与综述。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 1999;3(4):303-25. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0304_2.
10
Costly signaling and cooperation.昂贵的信号传递与合作。
J Theor Biol. 2001 Nov 7;213(1):103-19. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2406.