Suppr超能文献

从基层医院转诊的创伤性脑损伤患者延迟神经外科干预与不良预后无关。

Delayed Neurosurgical Intervention in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Referred From Primary Hospitals Is Not Associated With an Unfavorable Outcome.

作者信息

Grevfors Niklas, Lindblad Caroline, Nelson David W, Svensson Mikael, Thelin Eric Peter, Rubenson Wahlin Rebecka

机构信息

Division of Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care (PMI), Department of Anesthesiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2021 Jan 13;11:610192. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.610192. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Secondary transports of patients suffering from traumatic brain injury (TBI) may result in a delayed management and neurosurgical intervention, which is potentially detrimental. The aim of this study was to study the effect of triaging and delayed transfers on outcome, specifically studying time to diagnostics and neurosurgical management. This was a retrospective observational cohort study of TBI patients in need of neurosurgical care, 15 years and older, in the Stockholm Region, Sweden, from 2008 throughout 2014. Data were collected from pre-hospital and in-hospital charts. Known TBI outcome predictors, including the protein biomarker of brain injury S100B, were used to assess injury severity. Characteristics and outcomes of direct trauma center (TC) and those of secondary transfers were evaluated and compared. Functional outcome, using the Glasgow Outcome Scale, was assessed in survivors at 6-12 months after trauma. Regression models, including propensity score balanced models, were used for endpoint assessment. A total of = 457 TBI patients were included; = 320 (70%) patients were direct TC transfers, whereas = 137 (30%) were secondary referrals. In all, = 295 required neurosurgery for the first 24 h after trauma (about 75% of each subgroup). Direct TC transfers were more severely injured (median Glasgow Coma Scale 8 vs. 13) and more often suffered a high energy trauma (31 vs. 2.9%) than secondary referrals. Admission S100B was higher in the TC transfer group, though S100B levels 12-36 h after trauma were similar between cohorts. Direct or indirect TC transfer could be predicted using propensity scoring. The secondary referrals had a shorter distance to the primary hospital, but had later radiology and surgery than the TC group (all < 0.001). In adjusted multivariable analyses with and without propensity matching, direct or secondary transfers were not found to be significantly related to outcome. Time from trauma to surgery did not affect outcome. TBI patients secondary transported to a TC had surgical intervention performed hours later, though this did not affect outcome, presumably demonstrating that accurate pre-hospital triaging was performed. This indicates that for selected patients, a wait-and-see approach with delayed neurosurgical intervention is not necessarily detrimental, but warrants further research.

摘要

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的二次转运可能导致治疗延迟和神经外科干预延迟,这可能是有害的。本研究的目的是研究分诊和延迟转运对预后的影响,特别是研究诊断时间和神经外科治疗时间。这是一项对2008年至2014年期间瑞典斯德哥尔摩地区15岁及以上需要神经外科护理的TBI患者进行的回顾性观察队列研究。数据从院前和院内病历中收集。使用已知的TBI预后预测指标,包括脑损伤蛋白生物标志物S100B,来评估损伤严重程度。对直接创伤中心(TC)患者和二次转运患者的特征及预后进行评估和比较。使用格拉斯哥预后量表评估创伤后6至12个月幸存者的功能预后。回归模型,包括倾向评分平衡模型,用于终点评估。总共纳入了457例TBI患者;320例(70%)患者直接转运至TC,而137例(30%)为二次转诊。总体而言,295例患者在创伤后的头24小时内需要进行神经外科手术(每个亚组约75%)。与二次转诊患者相比,直接转运至TC的患者损伤更严重(格拉斯哥昏迷量表中位数为8 vs. 13),且遭受高能量创伤的比例更高(31% vs. 2.9%)。TC转运组入院时的S100B水平更高,不过创伤后12至36小时两组的S100B水平相似。使用倾向评分可以预测直接或间接转运至TC的情况。二次转诊患者到初级医院的距离较短,但与TC组相比,其接受放射检查和手术的时间较晚(均P<0.001)。在有和没有倾向匹配的调整多变量分析中,未发现直接或二次转运与预后有显著相关性。从创伤到手术的时间并未影响预后。二次转运至TC的TBI患者手术干预延迟数小时进行,不过这并未影响预后,推测这表明进行了准确的院前分诊。这表明对于选定的患者,延迟神经外科干预的观察等待方法不一定有害,但值得进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/196a/7839281/0c0691d08815/fneur-11-610192-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验