文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

移动健康应用中隐私保护方法的用户偏好:一项混合方法研究。

User Preferences for Privacy Protection Methods in Mobile Health Apps: A Mixed-Methods Study.

作者信息

Zhou Leming, Parmanto Bambang

机构信息

Department of Health Information Management, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Int J Telerehabil. 2020 Dec 8;12(2):13-26. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2020.6319.


DOI:10.5195/ijt.2020.6319
PMID:33520091
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7757650/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mobile health (mHealth) apps have the potential to facilitate convenient health care delivery and self-management of health. However, many users have concerns about their privacy when they use mHealth apps. Different apps provide different solutions for protecting users' privacy. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine user preferences among the several privacy protection methods used in current mHealth apps and the reasons behind their preferences. METHODS: Five privacy protection methods currently used in mHealth apps were presented to a group of study participants who had mild or moderate depression and expressed concerns about privacy of information when they used mental health apps. After a demonstration of the methods, study participants were asked to fill out a questionnaire and indicate their perceived privacy protection level (PPPL) of each method, their preference rating for each method, and the privacy protection methods they had used in the past. A brief interview was then conducted to collect study participants' comments on these methods and elicit the reasons for their preference ratings. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the statistical significance of differences in participants' preference ratings and in the PPPLs obtained for the five methods. Study participants' comments on the privacy protection methods and suggestions were noted and summarized. RESULTS: Forty (40) study participants were selected from a large candidate pool using the IRB approved selection criteria. All study participants viewed the app demonstration and understood the five privacy protection methods properly, which was indicated by their correct sorting of the PPPL of the five methods in their answers to the questionnaire. All study participants specified their preferences with respect to these methods and provided the rationale behind their selections on the questionnaire and during the brief interview. The results indicate that the users preferred privacy protection methods with because of their convenience and strong privacy protection, where the customization can be done either in the app or via a Web portal. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified user preferred privacy protection methods. These identified privacy protection methods may be used in many types of apps that perform sensitive health information management to better protect users' privacy and encourage more users to adopt these mHealth apps.

摘要

背景:移动健康(mHealth)应用程序有潜力促进便捷的医疗服务提供和健康自我管理。然而,许多用户在使用移动健康应用程序时担心其隐私问题。不同的应用程序提供不同的保护用户隐私的解决方案。 目的:本研究的目的是确定当前移动健康应用程序中使用的几种隐私保护方法中用户的偏好以及他们偏好背后的原因。 方法:向一组患有轻度或中度抑郁症且在使用心理健康应用程序时对信息隐私表示担忧的研究参与者展示了移动健康应用程序当前使用的五种隐私保护方法。在对这些方法进行演示后,要求研究参与者填写一份问卷,并指出他们对每种方法的感知隐私保护水平(PPPL)、对每种方法的偏好评分以及他们过去使用过的隐私保护方法。然后进行简短访谈,收集研究参与者对这些方法的评论,并引出他们偏好评分的原因。进行统计分析以确定参与者偏好评分以及五种方法获得的PPPL差异的统计显著性。记录并总结了研究参与者对隐私保护方法的评论和建议。 结果:根据机构审查委员会(IRB)批准的选择标准,从大量候选人群中选出了40名研究参与者。所有研究参与者都观看了应用程序演示并正确理解了五种隐私保护方法,这从他们在问卷答案中对五种方法的PPPL的正确排序中可以看出。所有研究参与者都明确了他们对这些方法的偏好,并在问卷和简短访谈中提供了选择背后的理由。结果表明,用户更喜欢具有[此处原文缺失相关内容]的隐私保护方法,因为它们方便且隐私保护强,其中定制可以在应用程序中或通过网络门户进行。 结论:本研究确定了用户偏好的隐私保护方法。这些确定的隐私保护方法可用于许多执行敏感健康信息管理的应用程序类型,以更好地保护用户隐私并鼓励更多用户采用这些移动健康应用程序。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bac5/7757650/09bbeac59ac5/ijt-12-2-13-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bac5/7757650/09bbeac59ac5/ijt-12-2-13-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bac5/7757650/09bbeac59ac5/ijt-12-2-13-g001.jpg

相似文献

[1]
User Preferences for Privacy Protection Methods in Mobile Health Apps: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Int J Telerehabil. 2020-12-8

[2]
Barriers to and Facilitators of the Use of Mobile Health Apps From a Security Perspective: Mixed-Methods Study.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019-4-16

[3]
Patients and Stakeholders' Perspectives Regarding the Privacy, Security, and Confidentiality of Data Collected via Mobile Health Apps in Saudi Arabia: Protocol for a Mixed Method Study.

JMIR Res Protoc. 2024-5-22

[4]
Smartphone Users' Persuasion Knowledge in the Context of Consumer mHealth Apps: Qualitative Study.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021-4-13

[5]
Making Self-Management Mobile Health Apps Accessible to People With Disabilities: Qualitative Single-Subject Study.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020-1-3

[6]
Self-Monitoring App Preferences for Sun Protection: Discrete Choice Experiment Survey Analysis.

J Med Internet Res. 2020-11-27

[7]
Comparing Professional and Consumer Ratings of Mental Health Apps: Mixed Methods Study.

JMIR Form Res. 2022-9-23

[8]
Consumers' Preferences for Purchasing mHealth Apps: Discrete Choice Experiment.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023-9-13

[9]
Understanding user engagement in mobile health applications from a privacy management perspective.

Health Promot Int. 2024-8-1

[10]
Mobile health and privacy: cross sectional study.

BMJ. 2021-6-16

引用本文的文献

[1]
Evaluation of Digital Mental Health Technologies in the United States: Systematic Literature Review and Framework Synthesis.

JMIR Ment Health. 2024-8-30

[2]
People with long-term conditions sharing personal health data via digital health technologies: A scoping review to inform design.

PLOS Digit Health. 2023-5-24

[3]
Multipurpose Mobile Apps for Mental Health in Chinese App Stores: Content Analysis and Quality Evaluation.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022-1-4

[4]
Findings from the 2021 Yearbook Section on Health Information Management.

Yearb Med Inform. 2021-8

本文引用的文献

[1]
An Adaptive Mobile Health System to Support Self-Management for Persons With Chronic Conditions and Disabilities: Usability and Feasibility Studies.

JMIR Form Res. 2019-4-25

[2]
Barriers to and Facilitators of the Use of Mobile Health Apps From a Security Perspective: Mixed-Methods Study.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019-4-16

[3]
Data sharing practices of medicines related apps and the mobile ecosystem: traffic, content, and network analysis.

BMJ. 2019-3-20

[4]
Preferences for an HIV prevention mobile phone app: a qualitative study among men who have sex with men in China.

BMC Public Health. 2019-3-12

[5]
Adoption of Mobile Apps for Depression and Anxiety: Cross-Sectional Survey Study on Patient Interest and Barriers to Engagement.

JMIR Ment Health. 2019-1-25

[6]
A Mobile App for Assisting Users to Make Informed Selections in Security Settings for Protecting Personal Health Data: Development and Feasibility Study.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018-12-11

[7]
Systematic Review of Mobile Health Applications in Rehabilitation.

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018-8-29

[8]
Patient Willingness to Consent to Mobile Phone Data Collection for Mental Health Apps: Structured Questionnaire.

JMIR Ment Health. 2018-8-29

[9]
Privacy, Trust, and Data Sharing in Web-Based and Mobile Research: Participant Perspectives in a Large Nationwide Sample of Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States.

J Med Internet Res. 2018-7-4

[10]
Discovery of and Interest in Health Apps Among Those With Mental Health Needs: Survey and Focus Group Study.

J Med Internet Res. 2018-6-11

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索