• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从安全角度看移动健康应用的使用障碍和促进因素:混合方法研究。

Barriers to and Facilitators of the Use of Mobile Health Apps From a Security Perspective: Mixed-Methods Study.

机构信息

Department of Health Information Management, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Apr 16;7(4):e11223. doi: 10.2196/11223.

DOI:10.2196/11223
PMID:30990458
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6488955/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A large number of mobile health (mHealth) apps have been created to help users to manage their health or receive health care services. Many of these mHealth apps have proven to be helpful for maintaining or improving their users' health. However, many people still choose not to use mHealth apps or only use them for a short period. One of the reasons behind this lack of use is the concern for their health information security and privacy.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to determine the relationship between users' characteristics and their security and privacy concerns and to identify desired security features in mHealth apps, which could reduce these concerns.

METHODS

A questionnaire was designed and validated by the research team. This questionnaire was then used to determine mobile app users' security and privacy concerns regarding personal health data in mHealth apps as well as the security features most users' desire. A semistructured interview was used to identify barriers to and facilitators of adopting mHealth apps.

RESULTS

In total, 117 randomly selected study participants from a large pool took part in this study and provided responses to the validated questionnaire and the semistructured interview questions. The results indicate that most study participants did have concerns about their privacy when using mHealth apps. They also expressed their preferences regarding several security features in mHealth apps, such as regular password updates, remote wipe, user consent, and access control. An association between their demographic characteristics and their concerns and preferences in security and privacy was identified; however, in most cases, the differences among the different demographic groups were not statistically significant, except for a few very specific aspects. These study participants also indicated that the cost of apps and lack of security features in mHealth apps were barriers for adoption, whereas having free apps, strong but easy-to-use security features, and clear user protection privacy policies might encourage them to use mHealth apps in their health management.

CONCLUSIONS

This questionnaire and interview study verified the security and privacy concerns of mHealth app users, identified the desired security and privacy features, and determined specific barriers to and facilitators of users adopting mHealth apps. The results can be used to guide mHealth app developers to create apps that would be welcomed by users.

摘要

背景

为帮助用户管理健康或获得医疗服务,已开发出大量移动医疗(mHealth)应用。事实证明,其中许多 mHealth 应用有助于维护或改善用户健康。但仍有许多人选择不使用 mHealth 应用或仅短时间使用。导致这种低使用率的原因之一是对健康信息安全和隐私的担忧。

目的

本研究旨在确定用户特征与其安全和隐私担忧之间的关系,并确定 mHealth 应用中降低这些担忧的所需安全功能。

方法

研究团队设计并验证了一份调查问卷,该问卷用于确定 mHealth 应用中个人健康数据的移动应用用户安全和隐私问题,以及大多数用户希望的安全功能。使用半结构化访谈确定采用 mHealth 应用的障碍和促进因素。

结果

从一个大型研究对象库中随机选择了 117 名研究参与者参与本研究,他们对经过验证的问卷和半结构化访谈问题做出了回应。结果表明,大多数研究参与者在使用 mHealth 应用时确实对隐私问题存在担忧。他们还对 mHealth 应用中的几个安全功能表示了偏好,例如定期密码更新、远程擦除、用户同意和访问控制。确定了他们的人口统计学特征与其安全和隐私方面的担忧和偏好之间的关联;但是,除了一些非常具体的方面外,大多数情况下,不同人口统计学群体之间的差异没有统计学意义。这些研究参与者还表示,应用成本和 mHealth 应用中缺乏安全功能是采用的障碍,而免费应用、强大但易于使用的安全功能以及明确的用户保护隐私政策可能会鼓励他们在健康管理中使用 mHealth 应用。

结论

本问卷调查和访谈研究验证了 mHealth 应用用户的安全和隐私问题,确定了所需的安全和隐私功能,并确定了用户采用 mHealth 应用的具体障碍和促进因素。研究结果可用于指导 mHealth 应用开发者开发出受用户欢迎的应用。

相似文献

1
Barriers to and Facilitators of the Use of Mobile Health Apps From a Security Perspective: Mixed-Methods Study.从安全角度看移动健康应用的使用障碍和促进因素:混合方法研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Apr 16;7(4):e11223. doi: 10.2196/11223.
2
Patients and Stakeholders' Perspectives Regarding the Privacy, Security, and Confidentiality of Data Collected via Mobile Health Apps in Saudi Arabia: Protocol for a Mixed Method Study.患者和利益相关者对沙特阿拉伯通过移动健康应用程序收集的数据的隐私、安全和保密性的看法:一项混合方法研究的方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 May 22;13:e54933. doi: 10.2196/54933.
3
Privacy and security in mobile health apps: a review and recommendations.移动健康应用中的隐私与安全:综述与建议
J Med Syst. 2015 Jan;39(1):181. doi: 10.1007/s10916-014-0181-3. Epub 2014 Dec 7.
4
Smartphone Users' Persuasion Knowledge in the Context of Consumer mHealth Apps: Qualitative Study.智能手机用户在消费者移动医疗应用背景下的说服知识:定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Apr 13;9(4):e16518. doi: 10.2196/16518.
5
Patients' Perspectives on the Data Confidentiality, Privacy, and Security of mHealth Apps: Systematic Review.患者对移动医疗应用程序的数据保密性、隐私性和安全性的看法:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 31;26:e50715. doi: 10.2196/50715.
6
User Preferences for Privacy Protection Methods in Mobile Health Apps: A Mixed-Methods Study.移动健康应用中隐私保护方法的用户偏好:一项混合方法研究。
Int J Telerehabil. 2020 Dec 8;12(2):13-26. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2020.6319.
7
Who is Tracking Health on Mobile Devices: Behavioral Logfile Analysis in Hong Kong.谁在移动设备上追踪健康数据:香港的行为日志文件分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 May 23;7(5):e13679. doi: 10.2196/13679.
8
Critical Criteria and Countermeasures for Mobile Health Developers to Ensure Mobile Health Privacy and Security: Mixed Methods Study.移动健康开发者确保移动健康隐私和安全的关键标准和对策:混合方法研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Mar 2;11:e39055. doi: 10.2196/39055.
9
Server-Focused Security Assessment of Mobile Health Apps for Popular Mobile Platforms.针对流行移动平台的移动健康应用程序的服务器端安全评估
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 23;21(1):e9818. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9818.
10
Data sharing practices of medicines related apps and the mobile ecosystem: traffic, content, and network analysis.药品相关应用程序和移动生态系统的数据共享实践:流量、内容和网络分析。
BMJ. 2019 Mar 20;364:l920. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l920.

引用本文的文献

1
Smartphone Apps and Wearables for Health Parameters in Young Adulthood: Cross-Sectional Study.用于青年期健康参数的智能手机应用程序和可穿戴设备:横断面研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Sep 3;12:e64629. doi: 10.2196/64629.
2
Evaluating user satisfaction and engagement in mHealth: Insights from the Integrated Digital Health Engagement Model (IDHEM).评估移动健康中的用户满意度与参与度:来自综合数字健康参与模型(IDHEM)的见解。
Digit Health. 2025 Jul 22;11:20552076251346698. doi: 10.1177/20552076251346698. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Grouping Digital Health Apps Based on Their Quality and User Ratings Using K-Medoids Clustering: Cross-Sectional Study.使用K-中心点聚类法根据数字健康应用程序的质量和用户评分进行分组:横断面研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Jul 23;13:e57279. doi: 10.2196/57279.
4
User Engagement with A Multimodal Conversational Agent for Self-Care and Chronic Disease Management: A Retrospective Analysis.用户与用于自我护理和慢性病管理的多模态对话代理的互动:一项回顾性分析。
J Med Syst. 2025 Jun 9;49(1):76. doi: 10.1007/s10916-025-02202-2.
5
Usage of a Multipurpose mHealth App Among Adults With Sickle Cell Disease: Randomized Controlled Trial.镰状细胞病成人患者中多功能移动健康应用程序的使用:随机对照试验。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jun 5;9:e67906. doi: 10.2196/67906.
6
Patient preferences for Remote cochlear implant management: A discrete choice experiment.患者对远程人工耳蜗管理的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 3;20(6):e0320421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320421. eCollection 2025.
7
Is mobile renewal enough? A qualitative study exploring stakeholders' perspectives on mobile phone-based add-ons for national health insurance uptake in Ghana.移动续保就足够了吗?一项定性研究,探讨利益相关者对加纳基于手机的国家医疗保险附加组件的看法。
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 8;25(1):1700. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22857-3.
8
Harnessing an Artificial Intelligence-Based Large Language Model With Personal Health Record Capability for Personalized Information Support in Postsurgery Myocardial Infarction: Descriptive Qualitative Study.利用具有个人健康记录功能的基于人工智能的大语言模型为术后心肌梗死提供个性化信息支持:描述性定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 30;27:e68762. doi: 10.2196/68762.
9
Barriers to the utilization of the Sehaty mobile health application in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional survey of non-healthcare users.沙特阿拉伯使用Sehaty移动健康应用程序的障碍:对非医疗保健用户的横断面调查
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 9;12:1554078. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1554078. eCollection 2025.
10
Examining Healthcare Practitioners' Perceptions of Virtual Physicians, mHealth Applications, and Barriers to Adoption: Insights for Improving Patient Care and Digital Health Integration.审视医疗从业者对虚拟医生、移动健康应用程序的看法以及采用障碍:改善患者护理和数字健康整合的见解
Int J Gen Med. 2025 Apr 1;18:1865-1885. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S515448. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Technology Adoption, Motivational Aspects, and Privacy Concerns of Wearables in the German Running Community: Field Study.德国跑步社区中可穿戴设备的技术采用、动机因素及隐私担忧:实地研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Dec 14;6(12):e201. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9623.
2
A Mobile App for Assisting Users to Make Informed Selections in Security Settings for Protecting Personal Health Data: Development and Feasibility Study.一款协助用户在保护个人健康数据的安全设置中做出明智选择的移动应用程序:开发与可行性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Dec 11;6(12):e11210. doi: 10.2196/11210.
3
Patient Willingness to Consent to Mobile Phone Data Collection for Mental Health Apps: Structured Questionnaire.患者对同意心理健康应用程序收集手机数据的意愿:结构化问卷
JMIR Ment Health. 2018 Aug 29;5(3):e56. doi: 10.2196/mental.9539.
4
The Complexity of Mental Health App Privacy Policies: A Potential Barrier to Privacy.心理健康应用程序隐私政策的复杂性:隐私的潜在障碍。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jul 30;6(7):e158. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9871.
5
Quality of Publicly Available Physical Activity Apps: Review and Content Analysis.公开可用的体育活动应用程序的质量:综述与内容分析
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Mar 21;6(3):e53. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9069.
6
Privacy Policies for Apps Targeted Toward Youth: Descriptive Analysis of Readability.面向青少年的应用程序隐私政策:可读性描述性分析
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jan 4;6(1):e3. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7626.
7
A Systematic Review of Research Studies Examining Telehealth Privacy and Security Practices used by Healthcare Providers.对医疗保健提供者使用的远程医疗隐私和安全实践的研究进行的系统评价。
Int J Telerehabil. 2017 Nov 20;9(2):39-59. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2017.6231. eCollection 2017 Fall.
8
User Authentication in Smartphones for Telehealth.用于远程医疗的智能手机中的用户认证
Int J Telerehabil. 2017 Nov 20;9(2):3-12. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2017.6226. eCollection 2017 Fall.
9
The Promise, Growth, and Reality of Mobile Health - Another Data-free Zone.移动健康的前景、发展与现实——另一个无数据区域
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 23;377(21):2010-2011. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1713180. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
10
Client-Focused Security Assessment of mHealth Apps and Recommended Practices to Prevent or Mitigate Transport Security Issues.以用户为中心的移动健康应用程序安全评估及预防或缓解传输安全问题的推荐做法。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Oct 18;5(10):e147. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7791.