• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我监测防晒应用偏好:离散选择实验调查分析。

Self-Monitoring App Preferences for Sun Protection: Discrete Choice Experiment Survey Analysis.

机构信息

Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 27;22(11):e18889. doi: 10.2196/18889.

DOI:10.2196/18889
PMID:33245282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7732707/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The availability and use of health apps continues to increase, revolutionizing the way mobile health interventions are delivered. Apps are increasingly used to prevent disease, improve well-being, and promote healthy behavior. On a similar rise is the incidence of skin cancers. Much of the underlying risk can be prevented through behavior change and adequate sun protection. Self-monitoring apps have the potential to facilitate prevention by measuring risk (eg, sun intensity) and encouraging protective behavior (eg, seeking shade).

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to assess health care consumer preferences for sun protection with a self-monitoring app that tracks the duration and intensity of sun exposure and provides feedback on when and how to protect the skin.

METHODS

We conducted an unlabeled discrete choice experiment with 8 unique choice tasks, in which participants chose among 2 app alternatives, consisting of 5 preidentified 2-level attributes (self-monitoring method, privacy control, data sharing with health care provides, reminder customizability, and costs) that were the result of a multistep and multistakeholder qualitative approach. Participant preferences, and thus, the relative importance of attributes and their levels were estimated using conditional logit modeling. Analyses consisted of 200 usable surveys, yielding 3196 observations.

RESULTS

Our respondents strongly preferred automatic over manually operated self-monitoring (odds ratio [OR] 2.37, 95% CI 2.06-2.72) and no cost over a single payment of 3 Swiss francs (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.49-1.99). They also preferred having over not having the option of sharing their data with a health care provider of their choice (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.40-1.97), repeated over single user consents, whenever app data are shared with commercial thirds (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.31-1.88), and customizable over noncustomizable reminders (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.09-1.54). While most participants favored thorough privacy infrastructures, the attribute of privacy control was a relatively weak driver of app choice. The attribute of self-monitoring method significantly interacted with gender and perceived personal usefulness of health apps, suggesting that female gender and lower perceived usefulness are associated with relatively weaker preferences for automatic self-monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the preferences of our respondents, we found that the utility of a self-monitoring sun protection app can be increased if the app is simple and adjustable; requires minimal effort, time, or expense; and has an interoperable design and thorough privacy infrastructure. Similar features might be desirable for preventive health apps in other areas, paving the way for future discrete choice experiments. Nonetheless, to fully understand these preference dynamics, further qualitative or mixed method research on mobile self-monitoring-based sun protection and broader preventive mobile self-monitoring is required.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/16087.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a10b/7732707/2ccc28d7bf2d/jmir_v22i11e18889_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a10b/7732707/93a66797f720/jmir_v22i11e18889_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a10b/7732707/d8c8be7057f0/jmir_v22i11e18889_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a10b/7732707/2ccc28d7bf2d/jmir_v22i11e18889_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a10b/7732707/93a66797f720/jmir_v22i11e18889_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a10b/7732707/d8c8be7057f0/jmir_v22i11e18889_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a10b/7732707/2ccc28d7bf2d/jmir_v22i11e18889_fig3.jpg
摘要

背景

健康类应用的可及性和使用量持续增加,正在彻底改变移动健康干预的提供方式。应用程序越来越多地被用于预防疾病、改善健康和促进健康行为。与此同时,皮肤癌的发病率也在上升。通过行为改变和充分的防晒措施,可以预防很多潜在风险。自我监测应用程序具有通过测量风险(例如阳光强度)并鼓励保护行为(例如寻找阴凉处)来促进预防的潜力。

目的

我们旨在评估健康消费者对可跟踪日晒时长和强度并提供防晒建议的自我监测应用程序的防晒偏好。

方法

我们进行了一项无标签离散选择实验,共 8 个独特的选择任务,参与者在 2 种应用程序备选方案之间进行选择,这两种方案由 5 个预先确定的 2 级属性(自我监测方法、隐私控制、与医疗保健提供者共享数据、提醒自定义和成本)组成,这些属性是通过多步骤和多利益相关者定性方法确定的。使用条件逻辑回归模型估计参与者的偏好,从而估计属性及其水平的相对重要性。分析包括 200 份可用的调查问卷,产生了 3196 个观测值。

结果

我们的受访者强烈倾向于自动监测而非手动操作监测(优势比 [OR] 2.37,95%置信区间 [CI] 2.06-2.72),并且更愿意选择无成本而不是支付 3 瑞士法郎的单一费用(OR 1.72,95% CI 1.49-1.99)。他们还更愿意选择能够选择与自己选择的医疗保健提供者共享数据(OR 1.66,95% CI 1.40-1.97),而不是选择单次用户同意,并且只要应用程序数据与商业第三方共享,就能够选择重复共享(OR 1.57,95% CI 1.31-1.88),而不是非自定义提醒(OR 1.30,95% CI 1.09-1.54)。虽然大多数参与者都支持彻底的隐私基础设施,但隐私控制属性是应用程序选择的一个相对较弱的驱动因素。自我监测方法属性与性别和对健康应用程序的感知有用性显著交互,表明女性性别和较低的感知有用性与对自动自我监测的相对较弱偏好相关。

结论

根据受访者的偏好,我们发现,如果应用程序简单且可调节、需要最少的精力、时间或费用,并且具有互操作性设计和完善的隐私基础设施,那么自我监测防晒应用程序的实用性就可以提高。在其他领域的预防性健康应用程序中,类似的功能可能是可取的,为未来的离散选择实验铺平了道路。然而,为了充分了解这些偏好动态,需要对基于移动自我监测的防晒和更广泛的预防性移动自我监测进行进一步的定性或混合方法研究。

相似文献

1
Self-Monitoring App Preferences for Sun Protection: Discrete Choice Experiment Survey Analysis.自我监测防晒应用偏好:离散选择实验调查分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 27;22(11):e18889. doi: 10.2196/18889.
2
Preferences for Sun Protection With a Self-Monitoring App: Protocol of a Discrete Choice Experiment Study.使用自我监测应用程序进行防晒的偏好:一项离散选择实验研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Feb 8;9(2):e16087. doi: 10.2196/16087.
3
Consumers' Preferences for Purchasing mHealth Apps: Discrete Choice Experiment.消费者对购买移动健康应用程序的偏好:离散选择实验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Sep 13;11:e25908. doi: 10.2196/25908.
4
The Reviews Are in: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Consumer Perspectives on Apps for Bipolar Disorder.评论如下:关于双相情感障碍应用程序消费者观点的定性内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 7;19(4):e105. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7273.
5
App Designs and Interactive Features to Increase mHealth Adoption: User Expectation Survey and Experiment.应用程序设计和交互功能以增加移动医疗的采用:用户期望调查和实验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Nov 4;9(11):e29815. doi: 10.2196/29815.
6
Adults' Preferences for Behavior Change Techniques and Engagement Features in a Mobile App to Promote 24-Hour Movement Behaviors: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.成年人对促进 24 小时运动行为的移动应用程序中行为改变技术和参与功能的偏好:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Dec 20;7(12):e15707. doi: 10.2196/15707.
7
Patients and Stakeholders' Perspectives Regarding the Privacy, Security, and Confidentiality of Data Collected via Mobile Health Apps in Saudi Arabia: Protocol for a Mixed Method Study.患者和利益相关者对沙特阿拉伯通过移动健康应用程序收集的数据的隐私、安全和保密性的看法:一项混合方法研究的方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 May 22;13:e54933. doi: 10.2196/54933.
8
Smartphone Users' Persuasion Knowledge in the Context of Consumer mHealth Apps: Qualitative Study.智能手机用户在消费者移动医疗应用背景下的说服知识:定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Apr 13;9(4):e16518. doi: 10.2196/16518.
9
Investigating Individuals' Preferences in Determining the Functions of Smartphone Apps for Fighting Pandemics: Best-Worst Scaling Survey Study.调查个人在确定抗击疫情智能手机应用程序功能方面的偏好:最佳最差标度调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 15;25:e48308. doi: 10.2196/48308.
10
Consumer preference to utilise a mobile health app: A stated preference experiment.消费者偏好使用移动健康应用程序:一项陈述偏好实验。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 21;15(2):e0229546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229546. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
2
Preferences for Mobile App Features to Support People Living With Chronic Heart Diseases: Discrete Choice Study.支持慢性心脏病患者的移动应用功能偏好:离散选择研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Apr 25;13:e58556. doi: 10.2196/58556.
3
Eliciting Preferences for the Uptake of Smoking Cessation Apps: Discrete Choice Experiment.

本文引用的文献

1
Preferences for Sun Protection With a Self-Monitoring App: Protocol of a Discrete Choice Experiment Study.使用自我监测应用程序进行防晒的偏好:一项离散选择实验研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Feb 8;9(2):e16087. doi: 10.2196/16087.
2
Public preferences for home care services for people with dementia: A discrete choice experiment on personhood.公众对痴呆症患者家庭护理服务的偏好:人格视角的离散选择实验。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jan;245:112675. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112675. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
3
Electronic Patient-Generated Health Data to Facilitate Disease Prevention and Health Promotion: Scoping Review.
探究对戒烟应用程序使用的偏好:离散选择实验
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 14;27:e37083. doi: 10.2196/37083.
4
Willingness to pay for health apps, its sociodemographic correlates, and reasons for being unwilling to pay.为健康应用程序付费的意愿、其社会人口统计学关联因素以及不愿付费的原因。
Digit Health. 2024 Apr 30;10:20552076241248925. doi: 10.1177/20552076241248925. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
5
Decision Trade-Offs in Ecological Momentary Assessments and Digital Wearables Uptake: Protocol for a Discrete Choice Experiment.生态瞬时评估与数字可穿戴设备应用中的决策权衡:一项离散选择实验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Sep 25;12:e47567. doi: 10.2196/47567.
6
A discrete choice experiment to examine the factors influencing consumers' willingness to purchase health apps.一项用于考察影响消费者购买健康应用程序意愿因素的离散选择实验。
Mhealth. 2023 Jul 3;9:21. doi: 10.21037/mhealth-22-39. eCollection 2023.
7
Patient Perspectives and Preferences for Consent in the Digital Health Context: State-of-the-art Literature Review.患者在数字健康背景下对知情同意的观点和偏好:最新文献综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 10;25:e42507. doi: 10.2196/42507.
8
Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design.理解数字健康产品的采用:使用贝叶斯有效设计的离散选择实验方法学教程。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 11;23(10):e32365. doi: 10.2196/32365.
利用电子患者生成的健康数据促进疾病预防和健康促进:范围审查
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Oct 14;21(10):e13320. doi: 10.2196/13320.
4
Barriers to and Facilitators of the Use of Mobile Health Apps From a Security Perspective: Mixed-Methods Study.从安全角度看移动健康应用的使用障碍和促进因素:混合方法研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Apr 16;7(4):e11223. doi: 10.2196/11223.
5
Measuring Engagement in eHealth and mHealth Behavior Change Interventions: Viewpoint of Methodologies.衡量电子健康和移动健康行为改变干预中的参与度:方法论视角
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Nov 16;20(11):e292. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9397.
6
Electronic patient-generated health data to facilitate prevention and health promotion: a scoping review protocol.利用电子患者生成的健康数据促进预防和健康促进:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 10;8(8):e021245. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021245.
7
Patient reminder and recall interventions to improve immunization rates: A Cochrane review summary.提高免疫接种率的患者提醒与召回干预措施:Cochrane系统评价综述摘要
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Mar;91:144-145. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.05.015. Epub 2018 May 24.
8
The Crush the Crave Quit Smoking App and Young Adult Smokers: Qualitative Case Study of Affordances.“粉碎烟瘾”戒烟应用程序与年轻成年吸烟者:可用性的定性案例研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jun 8;6(6):e134. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9489.
9
Conducting a Discrete-Choice Experiment Study Following Recommendations for Good Research Practices: An Application for Eliciting Patient Preferences for Diabetes Treatments.遵循良好研究实践建议开展离散选择实验研究:一项用于引出患者对糖尿病治疗偏好的应用研究。
Value Health. 2018 Jan;21(1):59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
10
The Promise, Growth, and Reality of Mobile Health - Another Data-free Zone.移动健康的前景、发展与现实——另一个无数据区域
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 23;377(21):2010-2011. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1713180. Epub 2017 Nov 8.