• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹直肌分离修复对腹部力量和功能的影响:一项系统综述

Impact of Rectus Diastasis Repair on Abdominal Strength and Function: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Gormley Jessica, Copeland Andrea, Augustine Haley, Axelrod Charlotte, McRae Mark

机构信息

Plastic Surgery, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Hamilton, CAN.

Plastic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, CAN.

出版信息

Cureus. 2020 Dec 29;12(12):e12358. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12358.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.12358
PMID:33520552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7839807/
Abstract

Rectus diastasis plication performed during abdominoplasty aims to narrow the widened linea alba and return the rectus muscle bellies to their anatomic position. It is unclear whether plication improves abdominal strength and function. This systematic review summarizes the effect of rectus plication on abdominal strength, function, and postoperative complications. A comprehensive search of CINAHL, Embase, Medline and Web of Science was performed. Screening and data extraction were performed in duplicate. Data were extracted from the included articles, and outcomes were analyzed categorically. A total of 497 patients from seven articles were included. Mean age was 44.5 years (range 20.5-72) and 94.4% were female. Three articles reported abdominal strength measurements, with two showing significant improvement. Four articles used the SF-36 survey, all demonstrating improvement in physical function subscale postoperatively. An additional six instruments were used to assess functional outcomes, of which four demonstrated significant improvement. The overall complication rate was 17.0%. Rectus plication is commonly performed during abdominoplasty to improve abdominal form and function. While the literature to date is encouraging with respect to functional outcomes, improvements in abdominal strength are less consistent. Heterogeneity in patient population, outcome measures, and comparison groups limit the strength of our conclusions. Future research should include a large comparative study as well as a protocol for standardizing outcomes in this population.

摘要

腹壁成形术中进行的腹直肌分离折叠术旨在缩小增宽的白线,并使腹直肌肌腹恢复到解剖位置。目前尚不清楚折叠术是否能改善腹部力量和功能。本系统评价总结了腹直肌折叠术对腹部力量、功能及术后并发症的影响。对CINAHL、Embase、Medline和Web of Science进行了全面检索。筛选和数据提取重复进行。从纳入的文章中提取数据,并对结果进行分类分析。共纳入7篇文章中的497例患者。平均年龄44.5岁(范围20.5 - 72岁),94.4%为女性。3篇文章报告了腹部力量测量结果,其中2篇显示有显著改善。4篇文章使用了SF - 36调查问卷,均表明术后身体功能子量表有所改善。另外使用了6种工具来评估功能结果,其中4种显示有显著改善。总体并发症发生率为17.0%。腹直肌折叠术常用于腹壁成形术中以改善腹部形态和功能。虽然迄今为止的文献在功能结果方面令人鼓舞,但腹部力量的改善并不一致。患者人群、结果测量和比较组的异质性限制了我们结论的力度。未来的研究应包括大型比较研究以及该人群结果标准化方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b822/7839807/02bc1a870e3b/cureus-0012-00000012358-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b822/7839807/02bc1a870e3b/cureus-0012-00000012358-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b822/7839807/02bc1a870e3b/cureus-0012-00000012358-i01.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of Rectus Diastasis Repair on Abdominal Strength and Function: A Systematic Review.腹直肌分离修复对腹部力量和功能的影响:一项系统综述
Cureus. 2020 Dec 29;12(12):e12358. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12358.
2
Surgical techniques for repair of abdominal rectus diastasis: a scoping review.腹直肌分离修复的手术技术:一项范围综述
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2021 Aug;55(4):195-201. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2021.1873794. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
3
The general surgeon's perspective of rectus diastasis. A systematic review of treatment options.普外科医生对腹直肌分离的看法。治疗选择的系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):4934-4949. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5607-9. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
4
Evaluation of functional outcomes following rectus diastasis repair-an up-to-date literature review.腹直肌分离修复术后功能结局的评估——最新文献综述。
Hernia. 2021 Aug;25(4):905-914. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02462-0. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
5
Treatment of rectus diastasis: should the midline always be reinforced with mesh? A systematic review.腹直肌分离的治疗:是否应始终使用网片加强中线?系统评价。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Aug;74(8):1870-1880. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.01.004. Epub 2021 Jan 31.
6
Do Absorbable Sutures Work for Rectus Diastasis Repair in Abdominoplasty Patients?可吸收缝线对腹壁成形术患者的腹直肌分离修复有效吗?
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2024 May 23;6:ojae040. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojae040. eCollection 2024.
7
Single-Layer Plication for Repair of Diastasis Recti: The Most Rapid and Efficient Technique.单层折叠术修复腹直肌分离:最快速有效的技术。
Aesthet Surg J. 2017 Jun 1;37(6):698-705. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjw263.
8
Mesh Repair of Rectus Diastasis for Abdominoplasty is Safer than Suture Plication.腹直肌分离的腹壁成形术中采用网片修补比缝线折叠术更安全。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Aug 4;9(8):e3721. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003721. eCollection 2021 Aug.
9
Operative correction of abdominal rectus diastasis (ARD) reduces pain and improves abdominal wall muscle strength: A randomized, prospective trial comparing retromuscular mesh repair to double-row, self-retaining sutures.腹直肌分离(ARD)的手术矫正可减轻疼痛并增强腹壁肌肉力量:一项比较肌后补片修补术与双排自固定缝线术的随机前瞻性试验。
Surgery. 2016 Nov;160(5):1367-1375. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.05.035. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
10
A Comprehensive, Evidence-Based Literature Review of the Surgical Treatment of Rectus Diastasis.腹直肌分离的手术治疗:全面、基于证据的文献综述。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Nov;146(5):1151-1164. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007252.

引用本文的文献

1
Morphological Changes in Rectus Abdominis Muscle Associated With Pregnancy and Abdominoplasty.与妊娠及腹壁成形术相关的腹直肌形态学变化
Aesthet Surg J. 2025 May 15;45(6):621-628. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjaf037.
2
The TOR concept (training, operation, and rehabilitation) applied to a cohort of postpartum women with training-resistant symptomatic rectus diastasis: evaluation 1 year after surgery.将 TOR 理念(培训、操作和康复)应用于一组有训练抵抗症状性腹直肌分离的产后女性:手术后 1 年的评估。
BJS Open. 2023 Jan 6;7(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac162.
3
Physical activity recommendations pre and post abdominal wall reconstruction: a scoping review of the evidence.

本文引用的文献

1
Reporting Outcomes and Outcome Measures in Digital Replantation: A Systematic Review.数字再植的结果报告与结果指标:一项系统评价
J Hand Microsurg. 2020 Aug;12(2):85-94. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701324. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
2
Reporting Outcomes and Outcome Measures in Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.报告拇指腕掌关节骨关节炎的结局和结局指标:系统评价。
J Hand Surg Am. 2021 Jan;46(1):65.e1-65.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.05.024. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
3
Reporting Outcomes and Outcome Measures in Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review.
腹壁重建术前和术后的体力活动建议:证据的范围综述。
Hernia. 2022 Jun;26(3):701-714. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02562-5. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
肘管综合征结局和结局测量指标的报告:系统评价。
J Hand Surg Am. 2020 Aug;45(8):707-728.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.04.001. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
4
Surgical treatment of diastasis recti: the importance of an overall view of the problem.腹直肌分离的手术治疗:全面看待问题的重要性。
Hernia. 2021 Aug;25(4):871-882. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02252-0. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
5
Long-term follow-up after surgical repair of abdominal rectus diastasis: A Prospective Randomized Study.腹直肌分离手术修复后的长期随访:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Scand J Surg. 2021 Sep;110(3):283-289. doi: 10.1177/1457496920913677. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
6
Cohort study of the effect of surgical repair of symptomatic diastasis recti abdominis on abdominal trunk function and quality of life.队列研究手术修复症状性腹直肌分离对腹部躯干功能和生活质量的影响。
BJS Open. 2019 Sep 11;3(6):750-758. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50213. eCollection 2019 Dec.
7
Treatment Options for Abdominal Rectus Diastasis.腹直肌分离的治疗选择
Front Surg. 2019 Nov 19;6:65. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2019.00065. eCollection 2019.
8
Outcomes and Outcome Measures in Breast Reduction Mammaplasty: A Systematic Review.乳房缩小成形术的结局和结局评估:系统评价。
Aesthet Surg J. 2020 Mar 23;40(4):383-391. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz308.
9
Abdominoplasty Improves Low Back Pain and Urinary Incontinence.腹部整形术可改善下腰痛和尿失禁。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Mar;141(3):637-645. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004100.
10
Managing Complications in Abdominoplasty: A Literature Review.腹壁成形术中并发症的处理:文献综述
Arch Plast Surg. 2017 Sep;44(5):457-468. doi: 10.5999/aps.2017.44.5.457. Epub 2017 Sep 15.