• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单层折叠术修复腹直肌分离:最快速有效的技术。

Single-Layer Plication for Repair of Diastasis Recti: The Most Rapid and Efficient Technique.

作者信息

Gama Luiz José Muaccad, Barbosa Marcus Vinicius Jardini, Czapkowski Adriano, Ajzen Sergio, Ferreira Lydia Masako, Nahas Fábio Xerfan

机构信息

Translational Surgery, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil.

Affiliate Professor and Coordinator of the Morphology Laboratory, University of Franca Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Aesthet Surg J. 2017 Jun 1;37(6):698-705. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjw263.

DOI:10.1093/asj/sjw263
PMID:28333252
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Plication of the anterior rectus sheath is the most commonly used technique for repair of diastasis recti, but is also a time-consuming procedure.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and time required to repair diastasis recti using different plication techniques.

METHODS

Thirty women with similar abdominal deformities, who had had at least one pregnancy, were randomized into three groups to undergo abdominoplasty. Plication of the anterior rectus sheath was performed in two layers with 2-0 monofilament nylon suture (control group) or in a single layer with either a continuous 2-0 monofilament nylon suture (group I) or using a continuous barbed suture (group II). Operative time was recorded. All patients underwent ultrasound examination preoperatively and at 3 weeks and 6 months postoperatively to monitor for diastasis recurrence. The force required to bring the anterior rectus sheath to the midline was measured at the supraumbilical and infraumbilical levels.

RESULTS

Patient age ranged from 26 to 50 years and body mass index from 20.56 to 29.17 kg/m2. A significant difference in mean operative time was found between the control and study groups (control group, 35 min:22 s; group I, 14 min:22 s; group II, 15 min:23 s; P < 0.001). Three patients in group II had recurrence of diastasis. There were no significant within- and between-group differences in tensile force on the aponeurosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Plication of the anterior rectus sheath in a single-layer with a continuous suture showed to be an efficient and rapid technique for repair of diastasis recti.

摘要

背景

腹直肌前鞘折叠术是修复腹直肌分离最常用的技术,但也是一个耗时的手术。

目的

本研究的目的是比较使用不同折叠技术修复腹直肌分离的疗效和所需时间。

方法

30名有相似腹部畸形且至少经历过一次妊娠的女性被随机分为三组接受腹部整形手术。腹直肌前鞘折叠术采用2-0单丝尼龙缝线分两层进行(对照组),或采用连续2-0单丝尼龙缝线单层进行(I组),或使用连续倒刺缝线(II组)。记录手术时间。所有患者在术前、术后3周和6个月接受超声检查,以监测腹直肌分离复发情况。在脐上和脐下水平测量将腹直肌前鞘拉至中线所需的力量。

结果

患者年龄在26至50岁之间,体重指数在20.56至29.17kg/m²之间。对照组和研究组之间的平均手术时间存在显著差异(对照组,35分钟22秒;I组,14分钟22秒;II组,15分钟23秒;P<0.001)。II组有3例患者腹直肌分离复发。在腱膜张力方面,组内和组间均无显著差异。

结论

采用连续缝线单层折叠腹直肌前鞘是一种修复腹直肌分离的有效且快速的技术。

相似文献

1
Single-Layer Plication for Repair of Diastasis Recti: The Most Rapid and Efficient Technique.单层折叠术修复腹直肌分离:最快速有效的技术。
Aesthet Surg J. 2017 Jun 1;37(6):698-705. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjw263.
2
Abdominal Wall Plication and Correction of Deformities of the Myoaponeurotic Layer: Focusing on Materials and Techniques Used for Synthesis.腹壁折叠术和肌肉腱膜层畸形的矫正:重点关注用于合成的材料和技术。
Aesthet Surg J. 2019 Mar 14;39(Suppl_2):S78-S84. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjy333.
3
Long-term ultrasonographic evaluation of midline aponeurotic plication during abdominoplasty.腹直肌成形术中中线腱膜折叠术的长期超声评估。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Aug;132(2):333-338. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182958ad2.
4
Is it possible to repair diastasis recti and shorten the aponeurosis at the same time?是否有可能同时修复腹直肌分离并缩短腱膜?
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014 Apr;38(2):379-86. doi: 10.1007/s00266-014-0272-z. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
5
Rectus sheath plication in abdominoplasty: assessment of its longevity and a review of the literature.腹直肌鞘折叠术在腹部整形术中的应用:对其持久性的评估及文献复习。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012 Mar;65(3):328-32. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2011.09.024. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
6
Should diastasis recti be corrected?腹直肌分离需要矫正吗?
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1997 Jul-Aug;21(4):285-9. doi: 10.1007/s002669900127.
7
Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of Onlay Mesh Abdominoplasty in Obese Multiparous Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Rectus Diastasis.经临床和影像学评估,腹直肌分离中重度的肥胖多产妇行腹直肌前鞘折叠式(Onlay)网片修补术。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 May;48(9):1778-1789. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03743-y. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
8
Evaluation of the long-term stability of sheath plication using absorbable sutures in 51 patients with diastasis of the recti muscles: an ultrasonographic study.51 例腹直肌分离患者应用可吸收缝线行鞘层折叠术的长期稳定性评估:超声研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Nov;130(5):714e-719e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318267d806.
9
Correction of Rectus Abdominis Diastasis: A Prospective Comparative Study Between a New Suturable Polypropylene Mesh vs Polypropylene Standard Suture Plication.腹直肌分离的矫正:新型可缝合聚丙烯网片与聚丙烯标准缝线折叠术的前瞻性对比研究。
Aesthet Surg J. 2024 May 15;44(6):633-640. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjae006.
10
Long-term follow-up of correction of rectus diastasis.腹直肌分离矫正的长期随访
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 May;115(6):1736-41; discussion 1742-3. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000161675.55337.f1.

引用本文的文献

1
Clarifying the Impact: Does Diastasis Recti Correction Truly Alleviate Low Back Pain?明确影响:腹直肌分离矫正真的能缓解腰痛吗?
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Aug 13. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-05156-5.
2
Mesh suture repair of rectus diastasis with and without a concurrent ventral hernia.伴有或不伴有同期腹疝的腹直肌分离的网状缝合修复术。
Hernia. 2025 Jul 14;29(1):232. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03409-5.
3
The Italian national consensus conference on the diagnosis and treatment of Rectus Abdominis diastasis in Post-gravidic Women.意大利产后女性腹直肌分离诊断与治疗全国共识会议。
Hernia. 2025 Jun 27;29(1):213. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03403-x.
4
Do Absorbable Sutures Work for Rectus Diastasis Repair in Abdominoplasty Patients?可吸收缝线对腹壁成形术患者的腹直肌分离修复有效吗?
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2024 May 23;6:ojae040. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojae040. eCollection 2024.
5
Comparative analysis of the efficacy and functionality of abdominoplasty versus minimally invasive techniques in the surgical treatment of diastasis rectus abdominis in postpartum women.腹直肌分离症产后女性手术治疗中腹壁整形术与微创技术疗效和功能的对比分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9052-9061. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10540-w. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
6
Simple plication alleviates physical symptoms in patients with post-gestational rectus diastasis.单纯折叠术可缓解产后腹直肌分离患者的躯体症状。
Hernia. 2023 Aug;27(4):957-968. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02814-y. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
7
Laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block is useful in pain relief after laparoscopic stapled repair of diastasis recti and ventral hernia.腹腔镜腹横肌平面阻滞在腹腔镜吻合器修复腹直肌分离和腹疝术后的疼痛缓解中具有作用。
J Minim Access Surg. 2023 Apr-Jun;19(2):207-211. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_111_22.
8
Efficacy and Challenges in the Treatment of Diastasis Recti Abdominis-A Scoping Review on the Current Trends and Future Perspectives.腹直肌分离治疗的疗效与挑战——当前趋势和未来展望的综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Aug 24;12(9):2044. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12092044.
9
Laparoscopic Repair of Diastasis Recti: A Case Report and Literature Review.腹腔镜下腹直肌分离修复术:病例报告及文献综述
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2019 Sep 15;22(3):127-130. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2019.22.3.127.
10
Open Versus Laparoscopic Surgical Management of Rectus Diastasis: Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Complications and Recurrence Rates.经腹与腹腔镜手术治疗腹直肌分离:并发症和复发率的系统评价和汇总分析。
World J Surg. 2022 Aug;46(8):1878-1885. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06550-9. Epub 2022 Apr 16.