• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病患者自我护理行为评估工具的设计与心理测量学评价

Design and psychometric evaluation of self-care behavior assessment tool in diabetic patients.

作者信息

RobatSarpooshi Davood, Taghipour Ali, Mahdizadeh Mehrsadat, Azadeh Saki, AliReza Jafari, Peyman Nooshin

机构信息

Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

出版信息

J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2020 Jul 2;19(2):709-716. doi: 10.1007/s40200-020-00549-6. eCollection 2020 Dec.

DOI:10.1007/s40200-020-00549-6
PMID:33520797
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7843767/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE S

Diabetes is the most common metabolic disease with an increasing prevalence throughout the world due to the changes in lifestyle. Appropriate self-care promotes the life condition of people with chronic illnesses and reduces the side effects of such diseases, so this study was designed to develop a scale for evaluating self-care in middle-aged patients diabetes.

METHODS

In this methodological study, the following 4 steps were conducted for design and psychometric measurement of the questionnaire: 1) Data collection was carried out during a supplementary cross-sectional survey of the qualitative study; 2) determining the face validity (the assessment of facility, difficulty, and ambiguity of the items and their importance for patients) and content validity of the questionnaire (the assessment of appropriateness and necessity of items by experts opinions and measuring CVR and CVI; 3) the internal consistency of the questionnaire was evaluated by determining the Cranach's alpha coefficient (α = 0.85), and 4) test-retest of the scale with a 2-weeks interval confirmed appropriate stability for the scale (ICC = 0.81). The normality of data was also evaluated using skewness and kurtosis. CFA was performed using AMOS version 24 software.

RESULTS

The first version of this questionnaire was produced with 71 items, of which 27 items were deleted during the process of validity and reliability confirmation. The final version of the questionnaire was provided with 44 items. For this study, 460 samples were used to examine the psychometric properties of the self-care scale.The confirmatory factor analysis showed a good fit to the data. Before the performing CFA, KMO and Bartlett's test of sphericity were evaluated and the results indicated an adequate sample (KMO = 0.956 and Bartlett's test: χ2 = 14,288.048, df = 946,  < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The findings showed that the designed questionnaire could assess self-care in patients with diabetes. This is a short, easy-to-use questionnaire that helps you understand what the patient needs to perform self-care behaviors.

摘要

目的

糖尿病是最常见的代谢性疾病,由于生活方式的改变,其在全球的患病率不断上升。适当的自我护理可改善慢性病患者的生活状况并减少此类疾病的副作用,因此本研究旨在开发一种用于评估中年糖尿病患者自我护理情况的量表。

方法

在这项方法学研究中,对问卷进行设计和心理测量时采取了以下4个步骤:1)在定性研究的补充横断面调查期间进行数据收集;2)确定问卷的表面效度(评估项目的难易程度、模糊性及其对患者的重要性)和内容效度(通过专家意见评估项目的适当性和必要性,并测量CVR和CVI);3)通过确定Cronbach's alpha系数(α = 0.85)来评估问卷的内部一致性;4)间隔2周对该量表进行重测,证实该量表具有适当的稳定性(ICC = 0.81)。还使用偏度和峰度评估数据的正态性。使用AMOS 24版软件进行验证性因素分析。

结果

该问卷的第一版有71个项目,在效度和信度确认过程中删除了其中27个项目。问卷的最终版本有44个项目。本研究使用460个样本检验自我护理量表的心理测量特性。验证性因素分析表明该量表与数据拟合良好。在进行验证性因素分析之前,评估了KMO和Bartlett球形检验,结果表明样本充足(KMO = 0.956,Bartlett检验:χ2 = 14288.048,df = 946,P < 0.001)。

结论

研究结果表明,所设计的问卷能够评估糖尿病患者的自我护理情况。这是一份简短、易于使用的问卷,有助于了解患者进行自我护理行为所需的内容。

相似文献

1
Design and psychometric evaluation of self-care behavior assessment tool in diabetic patients.糖尿病患者自我护理行为评估工具的设计与心理测量学评价
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2020 Jul 2;19(2):709-716. doi: 10.1007/s40200-020-00549-6. eCollection 2020 Dec.
2
Psychometric Properties of a Questionnaire on Brucellosis Prevention Behaviors Based on the PRECEDE Model Among Rural Farmers and Their Family Members.基于PRECEDE模型的农村农民及其家庭成员布鲁氏菌病预防行为问卷的心理测量特性
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020 Jun 9;13:539-548. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S247356. eCollection 2020.
3
Designing and psychometric evaluation of disease-related fear scale (D-RFS) in adults with epilepsy: A sequential exploratory mixed methods design.成人癫痫患者疾病相关恐惧量表(D-RFS)的设计和心理计量学评估:序贯探索性混合方法设计。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Sep;110:107169. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107169. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
4
Development and Psychometric Properties of a health-promoting self-care behavior scale (HPSCB-S) in recovered patients from Drug Addiction.《戒毒康复患者健康促进自我护理行为量表(HPSCB-S)的编制及心理测量学特性研究》
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 28;23(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15311-9.
5
Development and evaluation of the psychometric properties of a hypertension self-care questionnaire.高血压自我护理问卷的心理测量学特性的开发与评估
ARYA Atheroscler. 2019 Sep;15(5):241-249. doi: 10.22122/arya.v15i5.1835.
6
Validity and reliability of the patient assessment on chronic illness care (PACIC) questionnaire: the Malay version.慢性病照护患者评估问卷(PACIC)的效度与信度:马来语版本
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jul 19;19(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0807-5.
7
Cardiac patients' beliefs about their illness and treatment: A sequential exploratory mixed methods design.心脏病患者对自身疾病及治疗的看法:一项序列探索性混合方法设计。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2019 Sep 18;33:98. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.33.98. eCollection 2019.
8
Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Patient readiness to engage in health information technology (PRE-HIT) instrument.患者准备使用健康信息技术(PRE-HIT)工具的波斯语版本的有效性和可靠性。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Mar 19;23(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01665-3.
9
Psychometric Properties of Persian Version of the Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale.巴卡斯护理结果量表波斯语版本的心理测量学特性
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2022 Mar 14;27(2):134-138. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_26_21. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr.
10
Empathy Assessment Scale.同理心评估量表。
North Clin Istanb. 2022 Aug 16;9(4):358-366. doi: 10.14744/nci.2022.55649. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Design and validation of a Questionnaire on the factors influencing self-care behaviors in patients with Multiple sclerosis (QFASMS).多 sclerosis 患者自我护理行为影响因素问卷(QFASMS)的设计与验证。
BMC Neurol. 2024 Jan 4;24(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12883-023-03522-x.
2
Development and Psychometric Properties of a health-promoting self-care behavior scale (HPSCB-S) in recovered patients from Drug Addiction.《戒毒康复患者健康促进自我护理行为量表(HPSCB-S)的编制及心理测量学特性研究》
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 28;23(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15311-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in the prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in association with obesity in Iran: 2005-2011.伊朗肥胖相关的糖尿病和空腹血糖受损流行趋势:2005-2011 年。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014 Feb;103(2):319-27. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.12.034. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
2
Self-management support in "real-world" settings: an empowerment-based intervention.“真实世界”环境中的自我管理支持:基于赋权的干预。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 May;79(2):178-84. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.029. Epub 2009 Nov 3.
3
Reliability and validity: a quick review.信度与效度:简要回顾
Diabetes Educ. 2007 Sep-Oct;33(5):775-6, 780. doi: 10.1177/0145721707308172.
4
Knowledge of diabetes mellitus among diabetic and non-diabetic patients in Klinik Kesihatan Seremban.芙蓉健康诊所糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者对糖尿病的认知情况。
Med J Malaysia. 2006 Oct;61(4):399-404.
5
The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations.内容效度指数:你确定你知道所报告的内容吗?评论与建议。
Res Nurs Health. 2006 Oct;29(5):489-97. doi: 10.1002/nur.20147.
6
Validation of the Australian/English version of the Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Scale.澳大利亚/英文版糖尿病管理自我效能量表的验证
Int J Nurs Pract. 2005 Aug;11(4):177-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2005.00518.x.
7
Obstacles which patients with type 2 diabetes meet while adhering to the therapeutic regimen in everyday life: qualitative study.2型糖尿病患者在日常生活中坚持治疗方案时遇到的障碍:定性研究
Croat Med J. 2004 Oct;45(5):630-6.
8
"They care but don't understand": family support of African American women with type 2 diabetes.“他们关心却不理解”:非裔美国2型糖尿病女性患者的家庭支持
Diabetes Educ. 2004 May-Jun;30(3):493-501. doi: 10.1177/014572170403000321.
9
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of psychological interventions to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病患者心理干预改善血糖控制的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Lancet. 2004 May 15;363(9421):1589-97. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16202-8.
10
Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030.全球糖尿病患病率:2000年的估计数及2030年的预测数。
Diabetes Care. 2004 May;27(5):1047-53. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.5.1047.