• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者准备使用健康信息技术(PRE-HIT)工具的波斯语版本的有效性和可靠性。

Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Patient readiness to engage in health information technology (PRE-HIT) instrument.

机构信息

Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.

Centre for Digital Transformation, School of Computing and Information Technology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Prim Care. 2022 Mar 19;23(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01665-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12875-022-01665-3
PMID:35305567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8934158/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Patient readiness to engage in health information technology (PRE-HIT) is a conceptually and psychometrically validated questionnaire survey tool to measure willingness of patients with chronic conditions to use health information technology (HIT) resources.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to translate and validate a health information technology readiness instrument, the PRE-HIT instrument, into the Persian language.

METHODS

A rigorous process was followed to translate the PRE-HIT instrument into the Persian language. The face and content validity was validated by impact score, content validity index (CVI) and content validity ratio (CVR). The instrument was used to measure readiness of 289 patients with chronic diseases to engage with digital health with a four point Likert scale. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to check the validity of structure. The convergent and discriminant validity, and internal reliability was expressed by average variance extracted (AVE), construct reliability (CR), maximum shared squared variance (MSV), average shared square variance (ASV), and Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Independent samples, t-test and one-way ANOVA were used respectively to compare the impact of sex, education and computer literacy on the performance of all PRE-HIT factors.

RESULTS

Eight factors were extracted: health information needs, computer anxiety, computer/internet experience and expertise, preferred mode of interaction, no news is good news, relationship with doctor, cell phone expertise, and internet privacy concerns. They explained 69% of the total variance and the KMO value was 0.79; Bartlett's test of sphericity was also statistically significant (sig < 0.001). The communality of items was higher than 0.5. An acceptable model fit of the instrument was achieved (CFI = 0.943, TLI = 0.931, IFI = 0.944, GFI = 0.893, RMSEA ≤ 0.06, χ2/df = 1.625, df = 292, P-value ≤ 0.001). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient achieved a satisfactory level of 0.729. The AVE for all factors was higher than 0.50 except for PMI (0.427) and CIEE (0.463) and also the CR for all factors was higher than 0.7, therefore, the convergent validity of the instrument is adequate. The MSV and ASV values for each factor were lower than AVE values; therefore, the divergent validity was acceptable.

CONCLUSION

The Persian version of the PRE-HIT was empirically proved for its validity to assess the level of readiness of patients to engage with digital health.

摘要

背景

患者使用健康信息技术准备度(PRE-HIT)是一个概念和心理测量学上经过验证的问卷工具,用于衡量慢性病患者使用健康信息技术(HIT)资源的意愿。

目的

本研究旨在将健康信息技术准备度工具 PRE-HIT 翻译成波斯语,并对其进行验证。

方法

我们采用严格的流程将 PRE-HIT 翻译成波斯语。采用影响评分、内容效度指数(CVI)和内容效度比(CVR)来验证表面效度和内容效度。该工具用于测量 289 名慢性病患者使用数字健康的准备程度,采用四点李克特量表进行评估。采用探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)来检查结构的有效性。采用平均方差抽取(AVE)、建构信度(CR)、最大共享平方变异(MSV)、平均共享平方变异(ASV)和克朗巴赫α系数来表示收敛效度和区分效度以及内部信度。采用独立样本 t 检验和单因素方差分析分别比较性别、教育程度和计算机素养对所有 PRE-HIT 因子表现的影响。

结果

提取出 8 个因子:健康信息需求、计算机焦虑、计算机/互联网经验和专业知识、首选交互模式、没有消息就是好消息、与医生的关系、手机专业知识和互联网隐私问题。这 8 个因子解释了总方差的 69%,KMO 值为 0.79;巴特利特球形检验也具有统计学意义(sig<0.001)。项目的共性大于 0.5。该工具的模型拟合度可以接受(CFI=0.943,TLI=0.931,IFI=0.944,GFI=0.893,RMSEA≤0.06,χ2/df=1.625,df=292,P 值≤0.001)。克朗巴赫α系数达到了 0.729 的满意水平。除了 PMI(0.427)和 CIEE(0.463)外,所有因子的 AVE 均高于 0.50,所有因子的 CR 均高于 0.7,因此,该工具的收敛效度是足够的。每个因子的 MSV 和 ASV 值均低于 AVE 值,因此,发散效度是可以接受的。

结论

波斯语版 PRE-HIT 经过实证验证,具有评估患者使用数字健康的准备程度的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7853/8934492/845d22e224ce/12875_2022_1665_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7853/8934492/845d22e224ce/12875_2022_1665_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7853/8934492/845d22e224ce/12875_2022_1665_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Patient readiness to engage in health information technology (PRE-HIT) instrument.患者准备使用健康信息技术(PRE-HIT)工具的波斯语版本的有效性和可靠性。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Mar 19;23(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01665-3.
2
Evaluation of reliability and validity regarding the Chinese version of Critical Cultural Competence Scale for clinical nurses.临床护士关键文化能力量表中文版的信度和效度评价。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Oct 28;47(10):1425-1434. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2022.210695.
3
Development of the PRE-HIT instrument: patient readiness to engage in health information technology.PRE-HIT工具的开发:患者参与健康信息技术的准备情况
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Jan 28;15:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-18.
4
Development and Validation of a Malay Version Questionnaire to Evaluate Remote Health Monitoring of COVID-19 via Telehealth Applications: Navigating Telehealth Evolution.通过远程医疗应用评估 COVID-19 远程健康监测的马来语版本问卷的开发与验证:驾驭远程医疗的发展
Cureus. 2024 Aug 23;16(8):e67579. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67579. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Persian version of the overactive bladder questionnaire (OAB-V8).膀胱过度活动症问卷波斯语版(OAB-V8)的跨文化适应性、信度和效度
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 3;10(11):e32298. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32298. eCollection 2024 Jun 15.
6
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of Persian version of Evidence Based Medicine Questionnaire (EBMQ) in postgraduate medical students in Iran.伊朗医学研究生的循证医学问卷(EBMQ)波斯语版本的翻译与跨文化调适。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 16;19(4):e0301831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301831. eCollection 2024.
7
Development and psychometric testing of the Readiness to Engage with Patient-Facing Health Information Technology Tools (RE-PHIT) scale.开发并检验面向患者的健康信息技术工具使用准备度量表(RE-PHIT)。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Oct;118:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
8
Designing and psychometric evaluation of disease-related fear scale (D-RFS) in adults with epilepsy: A sequential exploratory mixed methods design.成人癫痫患者疾病相关恐惧量表(D-RFS)的设计和心理计量学评估:序贯探索性混合方法设计。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Sep;110:107169. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107169. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
9
Translation and validation of the Persian version of diabetic foot ulcer scaleshort form (DFS-SF).糖尿病足溃疡量表简体中文简化版(DFS-SF)的翻译和验证。
Int Wound J. 2023 Mar;20(3):822-830. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13929. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
10
Evaluation the validity and reliability of persian short form of the literacy of suicide scale (LOSS): a methodological study in 2022.评估自杀素养量表(LOSS)波斯文短式版本的有效性和可靠性:2022 年的方法学研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 25;23(1):783. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05281-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the emotional labour scale for nurses.护士情绪劳动量表波斯语版本的效度和信度
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 15;24(1):923. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03587-8.
2
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the SF-36v2 in patients with severe mental illnesses in China: factor structure, reliability, and validity.中文版SF-36v2在中国重性精神疾病患者中的心理测量学特性:因子结构、信度和效度
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Mar 6;23(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02350-6.
3
Assessing the mediating role of knowledge management in the relationship between technological innovation and sustainable competitive advantage.

本文引用的文献

1
Validity, Reliability, and Optimal Cut-off Scores of the WHO-5, PHQ-9, and PHQ-2 to Screen Depression Among University Students in Iran.用于筛查伊朗大学生抑郁症的世界卫生组织五维度健康量表(WHO-5)、患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)和患者健康问卷-2(PHQ-2)的效度、信度及最佳临界值
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022;20(3):1824-1833. doi: 10.1007/s11469-021-00483-5. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
2
Telemedicine in the Time of Coronavirus.冠状病毒时代的远程医疗。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Jul;60(1):e12-e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.03.019. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
3
Development of the Multidimensional Readiness and Enablement Index for Health Technology (READHY) Tool to Measure Individuals' Health Technology Readiness: Initial Testing in a Cancer Rehabilitation Setting.
评估知识管理在技术创新与可持续竞争优势关系中的中介作用。
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 5;10(23):e39994. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39994. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.
4
Psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the perception of conscience questionnaire in Iranian nurses.伊朗护士中良心感知问卷波斯语版本的心理测量学评估
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2023 Dec 30;16:16. doi: 10.18502/jmehm.v16i16.14615. eCollection 2023.
用于测量个体健康技术准备情况的健康技术多维准备与赋能指数(READHY)工具的开发:在癌症康复环境中的初步测试。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 12;21(2):e10377. doi: 10.2196/10377.
4
Predictors of Osteopathic Medical Students' Readiness to Use Health Information Technology.整骨医学专业学生使用健康信息技术准备情况的预测因素。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2017 Dec 1;117(12):773-781. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2017.149.
5
e-Health readiness assessment factors and measuring tools: A systematic review.电子健康准备度评估因素及测量工具:一项系统综述
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Nov;107:56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.08.006. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
6
Quantifying beliefs regarding telehealth: Development of the Whole Systems Demonstrator Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire.量化对远程医疗的信念:全系统演示服务用户技术接受度问卷的开发。
J Telemed Telecare. 2017 May;23(4):460-469. doi: 10.1177/1357633X16649531. Epub 2016 May 25.
7
Design and Implementation Content Validity Study: Development of an instrument for measuring Patient-Centered Communication.设计与实施内容效度研究:开发一种用于测量以患者为中心的沟通的工具。
J Caring Sci. 2015 Jun 1;4(2):165-78. doi: 10.15171/jcs.2015.017. eCollection 2015 Jun.
8
Gender Differences in Searching for Health Information on the Internet and the Virtual Patient-Physician Relationship in Germany: Exploratory Results on How Men and Women Differ and Why.德国互联网健康信息搜索中的性别差异及虚拟医患关系:关于男性与女性差异及原因的探索性结果
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 22;17(6):e156. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4127.
9
Development of a Questionnaire and Cross-Sectional Survey of Patient eHealth Readiness and eHealth Inequalities.患者电子健康准备度及电子健康不平等问题问卷的编制与横断面调查
Med 2 0. 2013 Sep 2;2(2):e9. doi: 10.2196/med20.2559. eCollection 2013 Jul-Dec.
10
Development of the PRE-HIT instrument: patient readiness to engage in health information technology.PRE-HIT工具的开发:患者参与健康信息技术的准备情况
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Jan 28;15:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-18.