Henn Jonas, Lingohr Philipp, Branchi Vittorio, Semaan Alexander, von Websky Martin W, Glowka Tim R, Kalff Jörg C, Manekeller Steffen, Matthaei Hanno
Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Front Surg. 2021 Jan 14;7:588228. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.588228. eCollection 2020.
Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) is a heterogeneous and life-threatening disease. While recent guidelines recommend a stepwise approach starting with non-surgical techniques, emergency laparotomy remains inevitable in certain situations. Open abdomen treatment (OAT) may follow, potentially resulting in additional risks for severe morbidity. Causative factors and clinical impact of OAT in SAP are poorly understood and therefore issue of the present study. A retrospective analysis of patients admitted to the Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery at University of Bonn suffering from acute pancreatitis (ICD K.85) between 2005 and 2020 was performed. Medical records were screened for demographic, clinical and outcome parameters. Patients who received primary fascial closure (PFC) were compared to those patients requiring OAT. SAP-specific scores were calculated, and data statistically analyzed ( = 0.05). Among 430 patients included, 54 patients (13%) had to undergo emergency laparotomy for SAP. Patients were dominantly male (72%) with a median age of 51 years. Indications for surgery were infected necrosis (40%), suspected bowel perforation (7%), abdominal compartment syndrome (5%), and acute intra-abdominal hemorrhage (3%). While 22 patients (40%) had PFC within initial surgery, 33 patients (60%) required OAT including a median of 12 subsequent operations (SD: 6, range: 1-24). Compared to patients with PFC, patients in the OAT group had significantly fewer biliary SAP ( = 0.031), higher preoperative leukocyte counts ( = 0.017), higher rates of colon resections ( = 0.048), prolonged ICU stays ( = 0.0001), and higher morbidity according to Clavien-Dindo Classification ( = 0.002). Additionally, BISAP score correlated positively with the number of days spent at ICU and morbidity ( = 0.001 and = 0.000002). Both groups had equal mortality rates. Our data suggest that preoperative factors in surgically treated SAP may indicate the need for OAT. The procedure itself appears safe with equal hospitalization days and mortality rates compared to patients with PFC. However, OAT may significantly increase morbidity through longer ICU stays and more bowel resections. Thus, minimally invasive options should be promoted for an uncomplicated and rapid recovery in this severe disease. Emergency laparotomy will remain ultima ratio in SAP while patient selection seems to be crucial for improved clinical outcomes.
重症急性胰腺炎(SAP)是一种异质性且危及生命的疾病。尽管近期指南推荐从非手术技术开始的逐步治疗方法,但在某些情况下急诊剖腹手术仍不可避免。随后可能会进行开放腹腔治疗(OAT),这可能会带来严重并发症的额外风险。OAT在SAP中的病因及临床影响尚不清楚,因此成为本研究的课题。对2005年至2020年间在波恩大学普通、内脏、胸科和血管外科就诊的急性胰腺炎(国际疾病分类K.85)患者进行了回顾性分析。筛查病历以获取人口统计学、临床和结局参数。将接受一期筋膜缝合(PFC)的患者与需要OAT的患者进行比较。计算了SAP特异性评分,并对数据进行了统计学分析(α = 0.05)。在纳入的430例患者中,54例(13%)因SAP接受了急诊剖腹手术。患者以男性为主(72%),中位年龄为51岁。手术指征为感染性坏死(40%)、疑似肠穿孔(7%)、腹腔间隔室综合征(5%)和急性腹腔内出血(3%)。22例(40%)患者在初次手术时进行了PFC,33例(60%)患者需要OAT,包括中位12次后续手术(标准差:6,范围:1 - 24)。与PFC患者相比,OAT组患者胆源性SAP显著较少(P = 0.031)、术前白细胞计数较高(P = 0.017)、结肠切除率较高(P = 0.048)、ICU住院时间延长(P = 0.0001),且根据Clavien - Dindo分类法并发症发生率较高(P = 0.002)。此外,BISAP评分与在ICU的天数及并发症发生率呈正相关(P = 0.001和P = 0.000002)。两组死亡率相同。我们的数据表明,手术治疗的SAP患者的术前因素可能提示需要OAT。与PFC患者相比,该手术本身似乎安全,住院天数和死亡率相同。然而,OAT可能会因ICU住院时间延长和更多的肠切除而显著增加并发症发生率。因此,应推广微创选择以促进这种重症疾病的简单快速康复。急诊剖腹手术在SAP中仍将是最终手段,而患者选择似乎对改善临床结局至关重要。