Stirling Aaron D, Moran Neil R, Kelly Michael E, Ridgway Paul F, Conlon Kevin C
Department of Surgery, Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Tallaght, Dublin 24, Ireland.
Department of Surgery, Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Tallaght, Dublin 24, Ireland.
HPB (Oxford). 2017 Oct;19(10):874-880. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
Using revised Atlanta classification defined outcomes, we compare absolute values in C-reactive protein (CRP), with interval changes in CRP, for severity stratification in acute pancreatitis (AP).
A retrospective study of all first incidence AP was conducted over a 5-year period. Interval change in CRP values from admission to day 1, 2 and 3 was compared against the absolute values. Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve and likelihood ratios (LRs) were used to compare ability to predict severe and mild disease.
337 cases of first incidence AP were included in our analysis. ROC curve analysis demonstrated the second day as the most useful time for repeat CRP measurement. A CRP interval change >90 mg/dL at 48 h (+LR 2.15, -LR 0.26) was equivalent to an absolute value of >150 mg/dL within 48 h (+LR 2.32, -LR 0.25). The optimal cut-off for absolute CRP based on new, more stringent definition of severity was >190 mg/dL (+LR 2.72, -LR 0.24).
Interval change in CRP is a comparable measure to absolute CRP in the prognostication of AP severity. This study suggests a rise of >90 mg/dL from admission or an absolute value of >190 mg/dL at 48 h predicts severe disease with the greatest accuracy.
使用修订后的亚特兰大分类定义的结果,我们比较了急性胰腺炎(AP)严重程度分层中C反应蛋白(CRP)的绝对值与CRP的区间变化。
对5年内所有首次发病的AP进行回顾性研究。将入院至第1、2和3天CRP值的区间变化与绝对值进行比较。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和似然比(LRs)来比较预测重症和轻症疾病的能力。
337例首次发病的AP纳入我们的分析。ROC曲线分析表明,第二天是重复测量CRP最有用的时间。48小时时CRP区间变化>90mg/dL(阳性似然比2.15,阴性似然比0.26)等同于48小时内绝对值>150mg/dL(阳性似然比2.32,阴性似然比0.25)。基于新的、更严格的严重程度定义,绝对CRP的最佳截断值>190mg/dL(阳性似然比2.72,阴性似然比0.24)。
CRP的区间变化在AP严重程度的预后评估中与绝对CRP具有可比性。本研究表明,入院时升高>90mg/dL或48小时时绝对值>190mg/dL预测重症疾病的准确性最高。