Clinical Outcomes of Perioperative Desensitization in Heart Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND

Sensitization remains a barrier to heart transplantation (HT). Perioperative desensitization strategies have been described; however, a paucity of evidence exists to demonstrate efficacy and safety in HT.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective study consisted of adults who received an HT. Perioperative desensitization was initiated if virtual crossmatch or flow-cytometry crossmatch was positive. Therapy consisted of plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rabbit antithymocyte globulin. Historical controls received standard immunosuppression or induction. The primary endpoint was survival at 12 mo. Secondary endpoints included freedom from acute rejection, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), and infectious complications.

RESULTS

Of the 104 patients included, 48 received no induction, 46 received induction, and 10 underwent perioperative desensitization. No differences were observed in the primary endpoint at 12 mo (90.0% versus 97.9%,  = 0.25 for desensitization versus no-induction; 90.0% versus 100%,  = 0.72 for desensitization versus induction). Rates of acute rejection were lower with induction and desensitization compared with no-induction. There were no significant differences in CAV between the groups. Infectious complications were also similar among the groups (10.0% versus 16.7%,  = 0.62 for desensitization versus no-induction; 10.0% versus 30.4%,  = 0.34 for desensitization versus induction).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that a perioperative desensitization strategy triggered by positive virtual crossmatch or flow-cytometry crossmatch allows for successful transplantation of sensitized HT recipients and results in acceptable rates of survival, rejection, CAV, and infection at 12 mo.