• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

狭窄的环境生态位预示着土地利用变化对陆地蜗牛群落的影响及群落的脆弱性。

Narrow environmental niches predict land-use responses and vulnerability of land snail assemblages.

作者信息

Wehner Katja, Renker Carsten, Simons Nadja K, Weisser Wolfgang W, Blüthgen Nico

机构信息

Ecological Networks, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Schnittspahnstraße 3, 64287, Darmstadt, Germany.

Naturhistorisches Museum Mainz, Landessammlung für Naturkunde RLP, Reichklarastraße 1, 55116, Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Ecol Evol. 2021 Feb 1;21(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12862-020-01741-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12862-020-01741-1
PMID:33522894
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7853316/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

How land use shapes biodiversity and functional trait composition of animal communities is an important question and frequently addressed. Land-use intensification is associated with changes in abiotic and biotic conditions including environmental homogenization and may act as an environmental filter to shape the composition of species communities. Here, we investigated the responses of land snail assemblages to land-use intensity and abiotic soil conditions (pH, soil moisture), and analyzed their trait composition (shell size, number of offspring, light preference, humidity preference, inundation tolerance, and drought resistance). We characterized the species' responses to land use to identify 'winners' (species that were more common on sites with high land-use intensity than expected) or 'losers' of land-use intensity (more common on plots with low land-use intensity) and their niche breadth. As a proxy for the environmental 'niche breadth' of each snail species, based on the conditions of the sites in which it occurred, we defined a 5-dimensional niche hypervolume. We then tested whether land-use responses and niches contribute to the species' potential vulnerability suggested by the Red List status.

RESULTS

Our results confirmed that the trait composition of snail communities was significantly altered by land-use intensity and abiotic conditions in both forests and grasslands. While only 4% of the species that occurred in forests were significant losers of intensive forest management, the proportion of losers in grasslands was much higher (21%). However, the species' response to land-use intensity and soil conditions was largely independent of specific traits and the species' Red List status (vulnerability). Instead, vulnerability was only mirrored in the species' rarity and its niche hypervolume: threatened species were characterized by low occurrence in forests and low occurrence and abundance in grasslands and by a narrow niche quantified by land-use components and abiotic factors.

CONCLUSION

Land use and environmental responses of land snails were poorly predicted by specific traits or the species' vulnerability, suggesting that it is important to consider complementary risks and multiple niche dimensions.

摘要

背景

土地利用如何塑造动物群落的生物多样性和功能性状组成是一个重要问题且常被探讨。土地利用集约化与非生物和生物条件的变化相关,包括环境同质化,并且可能作为一种环境过滤器来塑造物种群落的组成。在此,我们研究了陆生蜗牛群落对土地利用强度和非生物土壤条件(pH值、土壤湿度)的响应,并分析了它们的性状组成(壳大小、后代数量、光偏好、湿度偏好、耐淹性和抗旱性)。我们描述了物种对土地利用的响应,以识别“赢家”(在高土地利用强度地点比预期更常见的物种)或土地利用强度的“输家”(在低土地利用强度地块更常见)及其生态位宽度。作为每个蜗牛物种环境“生态位宽度”的代理指标,基于其出现地点的条件,我们定义了一个五维生态位超体积。然后,我们测试了土地利用响应和生态位是否有助于由红色名录状态所表明的物种潜在脆弱性。

结果

我们的结果证实,森林和草原中蜗牛群落的性状组成都因土地利用强度和非生物条件而显著改变。虽然在森林中出现的物种中只有4%是集约森林管理的显著输家,但草原中输家的比例要高得多(21%)。然而,物种对土地利用强度和土壤条件的响应在很大程度上独立于特定性状和物种的红色名录状态(脆弱性)。相反,脆弱性仅反映在物种的稀有性及其生态位超体积中:受威胁物种的特征是在森林中出现频率低,在草原中出现频率和丰度低,并且由土地利用成分和非生物因素量化的生态位狭窄。

结论

特定性状或物种的脆弱性对陆生蜗牛的土地利用和环境响应预测性很差,这表明考虑互补风险和多个生态位维度很重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa15/7853316/56f65040bb05/12862_2020_1741_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa15/7853316/48be65c4174f/12862_2020_1741_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa15/7853316/08082688a3f6/12862_2020_1741_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa15/7853316/f64fa1f9a2e1/12862_2020_1741_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa15/7853316/56f65040bb05/12862_2020_1741_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa15/7853316/48be65c4174f/12862_2020_1741_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa15/7853316/08082688a3f6/12862_2020_1741_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa15/7853316/f64fa1f9a2e1/12862_2020_1741_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa15/7853316/56f65040bb05/12862_2020_1741_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Narrow environmental niches predict land-use responses and vulnerability of land snail assemblages.狭窄的环境生态位预示着土地利用变化对陆地蜗牛群落的影响及群落的脆弱性。
BMC Ecol Evol. 2021 Feb 1;21(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12862-020-01741-1.
2
Land-use type and intensity differentially filter traits in above- and below-ground arthropod communities.土地利用类型和强度对地上和地下节肢动物群落的性状进行了不同程度的筛选。
J Anim Ecol. 2017 May;86(3):511-520. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12641. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
3
How land-use intensity affects sexual and parthenogenetic oribatid mites in temperate forests and grasslands in Germany.土地利用强度如何影响德国温带森林和草原中的两性和孤雌生殖食真菌甲螨。
Exp Appl Acarol. 2021 Mar;83(3):343-373. doi: 10.1007/s10493-020-00586-z. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
4
Mid- and long-term responses of land snail communities to the intensification of mountain hay meadows management.陆地蜗牛群落对山地干草甸管理集约化的中长期响应。
BMC Ecol Evol. 2022 Feb 15;22(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12862-022-01972-4.
5
The type of forest edge shapes snail assemblages at forest-pasture transitions.森林边缘的类型塑造了森林-牧场过渡带的蜗牛群落。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 5;13(1):16761. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43758-8.
6
Intensive land use drives small-scale homogenization of plant- and leafhopper communities and promotes generalists.高强度土地利用推动了植物和叶蝉群落的小规模同质化,并促进了广适性物种。
Oecologia. 2018 Feb;186(2):529-540. doi: 10.1007/s00442-017-4031-0. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
7
Rarity is a more reliable indicator of land-use impacts on soil invertebrate communities than other diversity metrics.稀有度是比其他多样性指标更能可靠指示土地利用对土壤无脊椎动物群落的影响的指标。
Elife. 2020 May 19;9:e52787. doi: 10.7554/eLife.52787.
8
Direct and indirect effects of land-use intensity on plant communities across elevation in semi-natural grasslands.土地利用强度对半自然草地不同海拔植物群落的直接和间接影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 24;15(11):e0231122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231122. eCollection 2020.
9
Land-use intensity alters networks between biodiversity, ecosystem functions, and services.土地利用强度改变了生物多样性、生态系统功能和服务之间的网络关系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Nov 10;117(45):28140-28149. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2016210117. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
10
Functional response traits and altered ecological niches drive the disassembly of cloud forest bird communities in tropical montane countrysides.功能反应特征和生态位改变导致热带山地农村云林鸟类群落解体。
J Anim Ecol. 2022 Nov;91(11):2314-2328. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13816. Epub 2022 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Environment-Driven Changes in the Functional Traits of Milk Thistle [ (L). Gaertn.] Along an Altitudinal Gradient in the Semi-Arid Environment: Perspective on Future Plant Invasion.半干旱环境中沿海拔梯度水飞蓟[(L.)Gaertn.]功能性状的环境驱动变化:对未来植物入侵的展望
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Jun 27;13:897678. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.897678. eCollection 2022.
2
Mid- and long-term responses of land snail communities to the intensification of mountain hay meadows management.陆地蜗牛群落对山地干草甸管理集约化的中长期响应。
BMC Ecol Evol. 2022 Feb 15;22(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12862-022-01972-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Intensive land use drives small-scale homogenization of plant- and leafhopper communities and promotes generalists.高强度土地利用推动了植物和叶蝉群落的小规模同质化,并促进了广适性物种。
Oecologia. 2018 Feb;186(2):529-540. doi: 10.1007/s00442-017-4031-0. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
2
High diversity stabilizes the thermal resilience of pollinator communities in intensively managed grasslands.高度的多样性稳定了集约化管理草原中传粉者群落的热恢复力。
Nat Commun. 2015 Aug 10;6:7989. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8989.
3
Measuring feeding traits of a range of litter-consuming terrestrial snails: leaf litter consumption, faeces production and scaling with body size.
测量一系列以落叶为食的陆生蜗牛的摄食特性:落叶消耗量、粪便产生量以及与体型的比例关系。
Oecologia. 2015 Jul;178(3):833-45. doi: 10.1007/s00442-015-3257-y. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
4
Resource-mediated indirect effects of grassland management on arthropod diversity.草地管理对节肢动物多样性的资源介导间接效应。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 4;9(9):e107033. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107033. eCollection 2014.
5
Land-use impacts on plant-pollinator networks: interaction strength and specialization predict pollinator declines.土地利用对植物-传粉者网络的影响:相互作用强度和专化性预测传粉者减少。
Ecology. 2014 Feb;95(2):466-74. doi: 10.1890/13-0436.1.
6
Niche breadth predicts geographical range size: a general ecological pattern.生态位宽度预测地理范围大小:一般生态模式。
Ecol Lett. 2013 Aug;16(8):1104-14. doi: 10.1111/ele.12140. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
7
Deterministic assembly of land snail communities according to species size and diet.根据物种大小和食性确定陆地蜗牛群落的确定性组装。
J Anim Ecol. 2010 Jul;79(4):803-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01685.x. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
8
Bumblebee vulnerability: common correlates of winners and losers across three continents.大黄蜂的脆弱性:三大洲赢家与输家的常见关联因素
Conserv Biol. 2009 Aug;23(4):931-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01176.x. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
9
Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction.生物同质化:在未来的大规模灭绝中,少数赢家取代众多输家。
Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Nov;14(11):450-453. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01679-1.