• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用机器学习训练算法检测动脉压波形误差

Detection of arterial pressure waveform error using machine learning trained algorithms.

作者信息

Rinehart Joseph, Tang Jia, Nam Jennifer, Sha Sophie, Mensah Paulette, Maxwell Hailey, Calderon Michael-David, Ma Michael, Joosten Alexandre

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Care, University of California Irvine, 101 The City Drive South, Orange, CA, 92868, USA.

Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Care, UCI Medical Center, 101 the City Drive South, Orange, CA, 92868, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Monit Comput. 2022 Feb;36(1):227-237. doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00642-4. Epub 2021 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1007/s10877-020-00642-4
PMID:33523353
Abstract

In critically ill and high-risk surgical room patients, an invasive arterial catheter is often inserted to continuously measure arterial pressure (AP). The arterial waveform pressure measurement, however, may be compromised by damping or inappropriate reference placement of the pressure transducer. Clinicians, decision support systems, or closed-loop applications that rely on such information would benefit from the ability to detect error from the waveform alone. In the present study we hypothesized that machine-learning trained algorithms could discriminate three types of transducer error from accurate monitoring with receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve areas greater than 0.9. After obtaining written consent, patient arterial line waveform data was collected in the operating room in real-time during routine surgery requiring arterial pressure monitoring. Three deliberate error conditions were introduced during monitoring: Damping, Transducer High, and Transducer Low. The waveforms were split up into 10 s clips that were featurized. The data was also either calibrated against the patient's own baseline or left uncalibrated. The data was then split into training and validation sets, and machine-learning algorithms were run in a Monte-Carlo fashion on the training data with variable sized training sets and hyperparameters. The algorithms with the highest balanced accuracy were pruned, then the highest performing algorithm in the training set for each error state (High, Low, Damped) for both calibrated and uncalibrated data was finally tested against the validation set and the ROC and precision-recall curve area-under the curve (AUC) calculated. 38 patients were enrolled in the study with a mean age of 52 ± 15 years. A total of 40 h of monitoring time was recorded with approximately 120,000 heart beats featurized. For all error states, ROC AUCs for algorithm performance on classification of the state were greater than 0.9; when using patient-specific calibrated data AUCs were 0.94, 0.95, and 0.99 for the transducer low, transducer high, and damped conditions respectively. Machine-learning trained algorithms were able to discriminate arterial line transducer error states from the waveform alone with a high degree of accuracy.

摘要

在危重症和高风险手术室患者中,常插入有创动脉导管以持续测量动脉压(AP)。然而,动脉波形压力测量可能会因压力传感器的阻尼或不当的参考位置而受到影响。依赖此类信息的临床医生、决策支持系统或闭环应用程序将受益于仅从波形中检测误差的能力。在本研究中,我们假设经过机器学习训练的算法能够以大于0.9的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线面积,从准确监测中区分三种类型的传感器误差。在获得书面同意后,在需要动脉压监测的常规手术期间,于手术室实时收集患者动脉管路波形数据。在监测过程中引入了三种故意设置的误差情况:阻尼、传感器偏高和传感器偏低。将波形分割成10秒的片段并提取特征。数据也可根据患者自身基线进行校准或保持未校准状态。然后将数据分为训练集和验证集,并以蒙特卡洛方式在具有可变大小训练集和超参数的训练数据上运行机器学习算法。对具有最高平衡准确率的算法进行修剪,然后针对校准和未校准数据,在每种误差状态(偏高、偏低、阻尼)的训练集中性能最佳的算法最终在验证集上进行测试,并计算ROC和精确召回曲线下面积(AUC)。38名患者参与了该研究,平均年龄为52±15岁。共记录了40小时的监测时间,约120,000次心跳被提取特征。对于所有误差状态,算法对状态分类的ROC AUC均大于0.9;使用患者特定校准数据时,传感器偏低、传感器偏高和阻尼情况下的AUC分别为0.94、0.95和0.99。经过机器学习训练的算法能够仅从波形中高度准确地区分动脉管路传感器误差状态。

相似文献

1
Detection of arterial pressure waveform error using machine learning trained algorithms.使用机器学习训练算法检测动脉压波形误差
J Clin Monit Comput. 2022 Feb;36(1):227-237. doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00642-4. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
2
Machine-learning Algorithm to Predict Hypotension Based on High-fidelity Arterial Pressure Waveform Analysis.基于高保真动脉压力波形分析的低血压预测机器学习算法。
Anesthesiology. 2018 Oct;129(4):663-674. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002300.
3
The effect of variable arterial transducer level on the accuracy of pulse contour waveform-derived measurements in critically ill patients.动脉换能器水平变化对危重症患者脉搏轮廓波形衍生测量准确性的影响。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2016 Oct;30(5):569-75. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9756-x. Epub 2015 Aug 23.
4
Artificial Intelligence for Aortic Pressure Waveform Analysis During Coronary Angiography: Machine Learning for Patient Safety.人工智能在冠状动脉造影期间主动脉压力波分析中的应用:机器学习保障患者安全。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Oct 28;12(20):2093-2101. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.036. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
5
Calibrated versus uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis in monitoring cardiac output with transpulmonary thermodilution in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: an observational study.校准与未校准动脉压波形分析在严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者经肺热稀释法监测心输出量中的应用:一项观察性研究
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Jan;32(1):5-12. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000173.
6
AI-Enabled Advanced Development for Assessing Low Circulating Blood Volume for Emergency Medical Care: Comparison of Compensatory Reserve Machine-Learning Algorithms.人工智能辅助评估低循环血量的先进方法在急诊医疗中的应用:补偿储备机器学习算法的比较。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Mar 30;22(7):2642. doi: 10.3390/s22072642.
7
Real alerts and artifact classification in archived multi-signal vital sign monitoring data: implications for mining big data.存档多信号生命体征监测数据中的真实警报与伪迹分类:对大数据挖掘的启示
J Clin Monit Comput. 2016 Dec;30(6):875-888. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9788-2. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
8
A Novel Mobile Phone Application for Pulse Pressure Variation Monitoring Based on Feature Extraction Technology: A Method Comparison Study in a Simulated Environment.一种基于特征提取技术的用于脉压变异监测的新型手机应用程序:模拟环境下的方法比较研究
Anesth Analg. 2016 Jul;123(1):105-13. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001282.
9
A Novel Machine-Learning Algorithm to Predict Stone Recurrence with 24-Hour Urine Data.一种基于 24 小时尿液数据预测结石复发的新型机器学习算法。
J Endourol. 2024 Aug;38(8):809-816. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0457.
10
Blood pressure and heart rate from the arterial blood pressure waveform can reliably estimate cardiac output in a conscious sheep model of multiple hemorrhages and resuscitation using computer machine learning approaches.在有意识的多次出血和复苏绵羊模型中,利用计算机机器学习方法,通过动脉血压波形得出的血压和心率能够可靠地估计心输出量。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Oct;79(4 Suppl 2):S85-92. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000671.

引用本文的文献

1
AI for the hemodynamic assessment of critically ill and surgical patients: focus on clinical applications.人工智能在危重症及外科手术患者血流动力学评估中的应用:聚焦临床应用
Ann Intensive Care. 2025 Feb 24;15(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13613-025-01448-w.
2
Towards the automatic detection and correction of abnormal arterial pressure waveforms.针对异常动脉血压波形的自动检测和校正。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2024 Aug;38(4):749-752. doi: 10.1007/s10877-024-01152-3. Epub 2024 Apr 4.