Suppr超能文献

建造者、租户和擅自占地者:现代叠层石中遗传物质的起源。

Builders, tenants, and squatters: the origins of genetic material in modern stromatolites.

机构信息

Environmental Studies Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.

出版信息

Geobiology. 2021 May;19(3):261-277. doi: 10.1111/gbi.12429. Epub 2021 Feb 1.

Abstract

Micro-organisms have long been implicated in the construction of stromatolites. Yet, establishing a microbial role in modern stromatolite growth via molecular analysis is not always straightforward because DNA in stromatolites can have multiple origins. For example, the genomic material could represent the microbes responsible for the construction of the stromatolite (i.e., "builders"), microbes that inhabited the structure after it was built (i.e., "tenants"), or microbes/organic matter that were passively incorporated after construction from the water column or later diagenetic fluids (i.e., "squatters"). Disentangling the role of micro-organisms in stromatolite construction, already difficult in modern systems, becomes more difficult as organic signatures degrade, and their context is obscured. To evaluate our ability to accurately decipher the role of micro-organisms in stromatolite formation in geologically recent settings, 16/18S SSU rRNA gene sequences were analyzed from three systems where the context of growth was well understood: (a) an actively growing stromatolite from a silicic hot spring in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, where the construction of the structure is controlled by cyanobacteria; (b) a mixed carbonate and silica precipitate from Little Hot Creek, a hot spring in the Long Valley Caldera of California that has both abiogenic and biogenic components to accretion; and (c) a near-modern lacustrine carbonate stromatolite from Walker Lake, Nevada that is likely abiogenic. In all cases, the largest percentage of recovered DNA sequences, especially when focused on the deeper portions of the structures, belonged to either the tenant or squatter communities, not the actual builders. Once removed from their environmental context, correct interpretation of biology's role in stromatolite morphogenesis was difficult. Because high-throughput genomic analysis may easily lead to incorrect assumptions even in these modern and near-modern structures, caution must be exercised when interpreting micro-organismal involvement in the construction of accretionary structures throughout the rock record.

摘要

微生物长期以来一直被认为与叠层石的形成有关。然而,通过分子分析来确定微生物在现代叠层石生长中的作用并不总是那么直接,因为叠层石中的 DNA 可能有多种来源。例如,基因组物质可能代表负责建造叠层石的微生物(即“建造者”)、在结构建成后栖息在其中的微生物(即“租户”),或者在建造后从水柱或后来的成岩流体中被动掺入的微生物/有机物质(即“寄居者”)。在现代系统中已经很难确定微生物在叠层石建造中的作用,而当有机特征退化且其背景变得模糊时,这种作用就更难确定了。为了评估我们在地质上较近的环境中准确解读微生物在叠层石形成中的作用的能力,对三个生长环境背景得到很好理解的系统中的 16/18S SSU rRNA 基因序列进行了分析:(a)怀俄明州黄石国家公园的一处硅质温泉中正在生长的叠层石,其结构的建造由蓝细菌控制;(b)加利福尼亚州长谷火山口的小热溪中的碳酸盐和硅质混合物沉淀,其具有生物成因和非生物成因的组成部分;(c)内华达州沃克湖的近现代湖相碳酸盐叠层石,可能为非生物成因。在所有情况下,回收的 DNA 序列中最大的百分比,尤其是在关注结构的较深部分时,属于租户或寄居者群落,而不是实际的建造者。一旦将其从环境背景中移除,就很难正确解释生物学在叠层石形态发生中的作用。由于高通量基因组分析即使在这些现代和近现代结构中也可能容易导致错误的假设,因此在解释微生物在整个岩石记录中对增生结构的构建的参与时必须谨慎。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验