Suppr超能文献

智能手表心电图和人工智能评估 COVID-19 大流行期间药物治疗的心律安全性。QT 日志研究。

Smartwatch Electrocardiogram and Artificial Intelligence for Assessing Cardiac-Rhythm Safety of Drug Therapy in the COVID-19 Pandemic. The QT-logs study.

机构信息

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Timone, Service de Cardiologie, Marseille, France; Aix Marseille University, C2VN, Marseille, France.

IHU-Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France; Aix-Marseille University, IRD, APHM, MEPHI, Marseille, France.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2021 May 15;331:333-339. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.01.002. Epub 2021 Jan 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

QTc interval monitoring, for the prevention of drug-induced arrhythmias is necessary, especially in the context of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). For the provision of widespread use, surrogates for 12‑lead ECG QTc assessment may be useful. This prospective observational study compared QTc duration assessed by artificial intelligence (AI-QTc) (Cardiologs®, Paris, France) on smartwatch single‑lead electrocardiograms (SW-ECGs) with those measured on 12‑lead ECGs, in patients with early stage COVID-19 treated with a hydroxychloroquine-azithromycin regimen.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with COVID-19 who needed hydroxychloroquine-azithromycin therapy, received a smartwatch (Withings Move ECG®, Withings, France). At baseline, day-6 and day-10, a 12‑lead ECG was recorded, and a SW-ECG was transmitted thereafter. Throughout the drug regimen, a SW-ECG was transmitted every morning at rest. Agreement between manual QTc measurement on a 12‑lead ECG and AI-QTc on the corresponding SW-ECG was assessed by the Bland-Altman method.

RESULTS

85 patients (30 men, mean age 38.3 ± 12.2 years) were included in the study. Fair agreement between manual and AI-QTc values was observed, particularly at day-10, where the delay between the 12‑lead ECG and the SW-ECG was the shortest (-2.6 ± 64.7 min): 407 ± 26 ms on the 12‑lead ECG vs 407 ± 22 ms on SW-ECG, bias -1 ms, limits of agreement -46 ms to +45 ms; the difference between the two measures was <50 ms in 98.2% of patients.

CONCLUSION

In real-world epidemic conditions, AI-QTc duration measured by SW-ECG is in fair agreement with manual measurements on 12‑lead ECGs. Following further validation, AI-assisted SW-ECGs may be suitable for QTc interval monitoring.

REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrial.govNCT04371744.

摘要

背景

为了预防药物引起的心律失常,有必要监测 QTc 间期,特别是在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的背景下。为了广泛应用,12 导联心电图(ECG)QTc 评估的替代方法可能是有用的。这项前瞻性观察研究比较了智能手表单导联心电图(SW-ECG)上人工智能(AI)-QTc(Cardiologs®,法国巴黎)评估的 QTc 持续时间与 12 导联 ECG 测量的 QTc 持续时间,在接受羟氯喹-阿奇霉素治疗方案的早期 COVID-19 患者中。

方法

连续接受 COVID-19 羟氯喹-阿奇霉素治疗的患者,接受智能手表(Withings Move ECG®,法国 Withings)。在基线、第 6 天和第 10 天记录 12 导联心电图,此后传输 SW-ECG。在整个药物治疗期间,每天早上在休息时传输 SW-ECG。通过 Bland-Altman 方法评估 12 导联心电图上手动 QTc 测量值与相应 SW-ECG 上 AI-QTc 之间的一致性。

结果

研究共纳入 85 例患者(30 例男性,平均年龄 38.3±12.2 岁)。手动和 AI-QTc 值之间存在良好的一致性,特别是在第 10 天,12 导联心电图和 SW-ECG 之间的延迟最短(-2.6±64.7 分钟):12 导联心电图上的 407±26 ms 与 SW-ECG 上的 407±22 ms,偏差 1 ms,一致性界限-46 ms 至+45 ms;两种测量方法之间的差异在 98.2%的患者中<50 ms。

结论

在真实的流行条件下,SW-ECG 测量的 AI-QTc 持续时间与 12 导联心电图上的手动测量值具有良好的一致性。在进一步验证后,人工智能辅助的 SW-ECG 可能适合 QTc 间期监测。

注册

ClinicalTrial.govNCT04371744。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a38/7845555/2ffb88773146/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验