Custers René
VIB, Rijvisschestraat 120, Ghent BE-9052, Belgium.
Emerg Top Life Sci. 2017 Nov 10;1(2):221-229. doi: 10.1042/ETLS20170019.
Governments all over the world are struggling with the regulatory status of gene-edited organisms. Are they regulated? Should they be regulated? In the present paper, the main focus is on the regulatory status of gene-edited organisms within the European regulatory framework. A stepwise analysis is performed that comes to the conclusion that gene-edited agricultural products that carry edits that can also occur naturally by mating and/or natural recombination are not a genetically modified organism. On the question whether they should be regulated, it is argued that it is difficult to require regulatory oversight that would go beyond what we now require for conventional products that can carry the same types of alterations. A regulatory approach is pleaded for that abides to fundamental principles of law making, and which allows for gene editing to develop responsibly.
世界各国政府都在努力应对基因编辑生物的监管状况。它们受到监管吗?应该受到监管吗?在本文中,主要关注的是欧洲监管框架内基因编辑生物的监管状况。本文进行了逐步分析,得出的结论是,携带可通过交配和/或自然重组自然发生的编辑的基因编辑农产品不是转基因生物。关于它们是否应该受到监管的问题,有人认为,很难要求进行超出我们目前对可能携带相同类型改变的传统产品所要求的监管监督。本文主张一种遵循立法基本原则的监管方法,这种方法能够让基因编辑技术负责任地发展。