Suppr超能文献

勇敢的讨论:急性疼痛医学是否应该成为一个独立的服务项目?

Daring discourse: should acute pain medicine be a stand-alone service?

机构信息

Anesthesiology, Division of Acute Pain Medicine, Bruce W Carter VA Medical Center, Miami, Florida, USA

Executive Cortex Consulting, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.

出版信息

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Jun;46(6):529-531. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-102288. Epub 2021 Feb 1.

Abstract

Acute pain medicine (APM) has been incorporated into healthcare systems in varied manners with some practices implementing a stand-alone acute pain service (APS) staffed by consultants who are not simultaneously providing care in the operating room (OR). In contrast, other practices have developed a concurrent OR-APS model where there is no independent team beyond the intraoperative care providers. There are theoretical advantages of each approach primarily with respect to patient outcomes and financial cost, and there is little evidence to instruct best practice. In this daring discourse, we present two opposing perspectives on whether or not APM should be a stand-alone service. While evidence to guide best practice is limited, our goal is to encourage discussion of the varied APS practice models and research into their impact on outcomes and costs.

摘要

急性疼痛医学(APM)已以不同的方式纳入医疗保健系统,一些实践采用了由顾问组成的独立急性疼痛服务(APS),这些顾问不在手术室(OR)同时提供护理。相比之下,其他实践已经开发了一个并发的 OR-APS 模型,除了术中护理提供者之外,没有独立的团队。每种方法都有理论上的优势,主要是在患者的结果和财务成本方面,几乎没有证据可以指导最佳实践。在这篇大胆的论述中,我们提出了关于 APM 是否应该是一个独立服务的两种相反观点。虽然指导最佳实践的证据有限,但我们的目标是鼓励讨论不同的 APS 实践模式,并研究它们对结果和成本的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验