Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Anesth Analg. 2020 Aug;131(2):650-656. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004655.
Acute pain services (APS) have developed over the past 35 years. Originally implemented solely to care for patients with regional catheters or patient-controlled analgesia after surgery, APS have become providers of care throughout the perioperative period, with some institutions even taking the additional step toward providing outpatient services for patients with acute pain. Models vary considerably in terms of tasks and responsibilities, staffing, education, protocols, quality, and financing. Many challenges face today's APS, including the increasing number of patients with preexisting chronic pain, intake of analgesics and opioids before surgery, substance-dependent patients needing special care, shorter hospital stays, early discharge of patients in need of further analgesic treatment, prevention and treatment of chronic postsurgical pain, minimization of adverse events, and side effects of treatment. However, many APS lack a clear-cut definition of their structures, tasks, and quality. Development of APS in the future will require us to face urgent questions, such as, "What are meaningful outcome variables?" and, "How do we define high quality?" It is obvious that focusing exclusively on pain scores does not reflect the complexity of pain and recovery. A broader approach is needed-a common concept of surgical and anesthesiological services within a hospital (eg, procedure-specific patient pathways as indicated by the programs "enhanced recovery after surgery" or the "perioperative surgical home"), with patient-reported outcome measures as one central quality criterion. Pain-related functional impairment, treatment-induced side effects, speed of mobilization, as well as return to normal function and everyday activities are key.
急性疼痛服务(APS)在过去的 35 年中得到了发展。APS 最初仅用于为手术后接受区域导管或患者自控镇痛的患者提供护理,但现在已成为围手术期护理的提供者,一些机构甚至更进一步,为急性疼痛患者提供门诊服务。APS 的模式在任务和职责、人员配备、教育、方案、质量和融资方面差异很大。目前,APS 面临许多挑战,包括越来越多的患者存在术前慢性疼痛、术前使用镇痛药和阿片类药物、需要特殊护理的药物依赖患者、住院时间缩短、需要进一步镇痛治疗的患者提前出院、预防和治疗慢性术后疼痛、减少不良事件以及治疗的副作用。然而,许多 APS 缺乏对其结构、任务和质量的明确定义。APS 的未来发展将要求我们面对紧迫的问题,例如,“有意义的结果变量是什么?”以及,“我们如何定义高质量?”显然,仅仅关注疼痛评分并不能反映疼痛和恢复的复杂性。需要采取更广泛的方法——在医院内建立一个共同的外科和麻醉服务概念(例如,“手术后强化康复”或“围手术期家庭护理”等计划所指示的特定于手术的患者路径),以患者报告的结果测量作为一个核心质量标准。疼痛相关的功能障碍、治疗引起的副作用、活动能力的恢复速度以及正常功能和日常活动的恢复都是关键。