• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新即刻水平基台对种植体颊侧骨壁放置后近中颊骨稳定性的影响:一项为期 1 年的随机对照临床试验。

The influence of new immediate tissue level abutment on crestal bone stability of subcrestally placed implants: A 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial.

机构信息

Institute of Odontology, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.

Vilnius Research Group, Vilnius, Lithuania.

出版信息

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Apr;23(2):259-269. doi: 10.1111/cid.12979. Epub 2021 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1111/cid.12979
PMID:33527729
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The relation between implant abutment disconnection (AD) and increased crestal bone loss is still debated.

PURPOSE

To compare bone changes below implant-abutment junction of subcrestally placed implants between: (1) implant level restorations, that underwent four ADs and (2) implants with immediate tissue level abutment with no AD, 1 month (T2) and 1-year (T3) after final restoration delivery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-four patients received 64 bone level implants with platform-switching and conical connection in edentulous sites of posterior mandible and maxilla. All implants were placed 1.5 mm subcrestally and distributed among: (1) control group, that received a regular healing abutment and (2) test group with immediate tissue level (ITL) abutment, which was torqued to implants during surgery, transforming bone level implant to tissue level type. After 2-3 months of healing and a 1-month temporization, final zirconia-based screw-retained crowns were delivered to both groups. Crestal bone levels were calculated after final crown delivery (T2); after 1-year follow-up (T3) and compared using Mann-Whitney U test (p ≤ .05).

RESULTS

Early bone loss of the test and control groups was 0.14 ± 0.27 mm and 0.64 ± 0.64 mm, respectively; the 0.5 mm difference was statistically significant (p = .0001). Late bone loss was 0.06 ± 0.16 mm and 0.21 ± 0.56 mm for the test and control group, respectively; the 0.15 mm difference between the groups was no more statistically significant (p = .22). Both groups displayed bone gain, 0.08 and 0.43 mm, respectively, and the overall crestal bone loss was reduced.

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate tissue level abutments can significantly reduce early bone loss when measured 1 month after final prosthesis delivery, however, after 1-year follow-up, difference between the groups was no more statistically significant.

摘要

背景

种植体基台连接体(AB)分离与牙槽骨吸收增加之间的关系仍存在争议。

目的

比较骨嵴下放置的种植体在以下两种情况下种植体-基台交界处的骨变化:(1)经历了 4 次 AB 分离的种植体水平修复体,(2)无 AB 分离的种植体,在最终修复体交付后 1 个月(T2)和 1 年(T3)。

材料和方法

64 名患者在后牙区无牙颌下颌和上颌植入 64 枚具有平台转换和锥形连接的骨水平种植体。所有种植体均放置在骨嵴下 1.5mm 处,分布于:(1)对照组,植入常规愈合基台,(2)实验组植入即刻软组织水平(ITL)基台,在手术中旋入种植体,将骨水平种植体转换为软组织水平类型。愈合 2-3 个月并临时修复 1 个月后,两组均交付氧化锆螺钉固位冠。在最终冠交付后(T2)、1 年随访后(T3)测量牙槽嵴骨水平,并使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验进行比较(p≤0.05)。

结果

实验组和对照组的早期骨损失分别为 0.14±0.27mm 和 0.64±0.64mm,两者相差 0.5mm,具有统计学意义(p=0.0001)。晚期骨损失分别为 0.06±0.16mm 和 0.21±0.56mm,组间相差 0.15mm,无统计学意义(p=0.22)。两组均有骨增量,分别为 0.08mm 和 0.43mm,总体牙槽骨吸收减少。

结论

即刻软组织水平基台可显著减少最终修复体交付后 1 个月时的早期骨丢失,但 1 年后,组间差异无统计学意义。

相似文献

1
The influence of new immediate tissue level abutment on crestal bone stability of subcrestally placed implants: A 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial.新即刻水平基台对种植体颊侧骨壁放置后近中颊骨稳定性的影响:一项为期 1 年的随机对照临床试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Apr;23(2):259-269. doi: 10.1111/cid.12979. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
2
Do repeated changes of abutments have any influence on the stability of peri-implant tissues? Four-month post-loading preliminary results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.种植体基台的反复更换对种植体周围组织的稳定性有影响吗?一项多中心随机对照试验的4个月加载后初步结果。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2015 Summer;8(2):129-40.
3
The influence of submerged healing abutment or subcrestal implant placement on soft tissue thickness and crestal bone stability. A 2-year randomized clinical trial.种植体愈合基台或种植体颈侧置埋对软组织厚度和牙槽嵴稳定性的影响。一项为期 2 年的随机临床试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Aug;22(4):497-506. doi: 10.1111/cid.12903. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
4
Immediate positioning of definitive abutments versus repeated abutment replacements in immediately loaded implants: effects on bone healing at the 1-year follow-up of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.即刻负重种植体中即刻就位最终基台与多次更换基台的比较:一项多中心随机对照试验1年随访时对骨愈合的影响
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012 Spring;5(1):9-16.
5
Do repeated changes of abutments have any influence on the stability of peri-implant tissues? One-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.种植体基台的反复更换对种植体周围组织的稳定性有影响吗?一项多中心随机对照试验的一年加载后结果。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017;10(1):57-72.
6
Nonremoval of immediate abutments in cases involving subcrestally placed postextractive tapered single implants: a randomized controlled clinical study.涉及拔牙后牙槽嵴顶下放置的锥形单颗种植体病例中即刻基台不拆除的随机对照临床研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Dec;16(6):794-805. doi: 10.1111/cid.12051. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
7
Immediate positioning of a definitive abutment versus repeated abutment replacements in post-extractive implants: 3-year follow-up of a randomised multicentre clinical trial.拔牙后种植体中即刻植入定制基台与多次更换基台的对比:一项随机多中心临床试验的3年随访
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010 Winter;3(4):285-96.
8
Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants: a radiographic study in the canine mandible.微间隙大小对非潜入式牙种植体嵴顶骨水平的影响:犬下颌骨的影像学研究
J Periodontol. 2002 Oct;73(10):1111-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2002.73.10.1111.
9
One abutment at one time: non-removal of an immediate abutment and its effect on bone healing around subcrestal tapered implants.一次一个基台:不拆除即刻基台及其对骨下皮质锥形种植体周围骨愈合的影响。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Nov;22(11):1303-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02111.x. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
10
The Effects of Subcrestal Implant Placement on Crestal Bone Levels and Bone-to-Abutment Contact: A Microcomputed Tomographic and Histologic Study in Dogs.牙槽嵴顶下种植体植入对牙槽嵴顶骨水平及骨与基台接触的影响:犬的微计算机断层扫描和组织学研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Sep-Oct;30(5):1068-75. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4043.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of intermediate abutment height and timing of placement on marginal bone loss in single implant-supported crowns: a 12-month follow-up randomized clinical trial.中间基台高度和植入时机对单颗种植体支持冠边缘骨吸收的影响:一项12个月随访的随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 May 8;29(6):291. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06364-8.
2
How Much is Stable the Bonding of CAD-CAM Implant-Supported All-Ceramic Restorations to Titanium Bases Clinically? A Systematic Review.CAD-CAM种植体支持的全瓷修复体与钛基在临床上的结合稳定性如何?一项系统评价。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2025 Mar 26;17:181-200. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S510760. eCollection 2025.
3
The effect of porous compliance bushings in a dental implant on the distribution of occlusal loads.
多孔顺应性衬套在牙种植体中对咬合负荷分布的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 18;14(1):1607. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51429-5.
4
Exploring the Importance of Corticalization Occurring in Alveolar Bone Surrounding a Dental Implant.探讨种植体周围牙槽骨中发生皮质骨化的重要性。
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 2;11(23):7189. doi: 10.3390/jcm11237189.
5
Measures of Corticalization.皮质化测量
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 16;11(18):5463. doi: 10.3390/jcm11185463.
6
What Does Bone Corticalization around Dental Implants Mean in Light of Ten Years of Follow-Up?基于十年随访,种植牙周围骨皮质化意味着什么?
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 20;11(12):3545. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123545.
7
Covariates Relating to Implant Failure and Marginal Bone Loss of a Novel Triangular Neck-Implant Placed by Post-Graduate Students: A 1-Year Prospective Cohort Study.与研究生植入的新型三角形颈部种植体失败及边缘骨丢失相关的协变量:一项为期1年的前瞻性队列研究。
Materials (Basel). 2022 Mar 8;15(6):1987. doi: 10.3390/ma15061987.