• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中间基台高度和植入时机对单颗种植体支持冠边缘骨吸收的影响:一项12个月随访的随机临床试验。

Influence of intermediate abutment height and timing of placement on marginal bone loss in single implant-supported crowns: a 12-month follow-up randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Quintas-Hijós Jacobo, Pérez-Pevida Esteban

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Sports and Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Huesca, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2025 May 8;29(6):291. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06364-8.

DOI:10.1007/s00784-025-06364-8
PMID:40335732
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12058957/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the most effective combination of abutment height and timing of placement in reducing marginal bone loss (MBL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

54 patients received at least one single screw-retained crown on an implant replacing a posterior tooth (60 implants). Implants were divided into six groups based on intermediate abutment height (1.5 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm) and timing of placement (immediate: surgery 1; delayed: surgery 2): Group A3I (height 3, surgery 1), Group A2I (height 2, surgery 1), Group A15I (height 1.5, surgery 1), Group A3D (height 3, surgery 2), Group A2D (height 2, surgery 2), Group A15D (height 1.5, surgery 2). Mesial and distal linear radiographic measurements were taken at five follow-up points: implant surgery, crown placement (T1), and 3 (T2), 6 (T3), and 12 months after loading (T4). Partial and total MBL were compared between groups.

RESULTS

After 12 months, the lowest MBL was found in groups A3I (0.13 ± 0.11 mm) and A2I (0.24 ± 0.11 mm), with no statistical difference between them. Groups A15I (0.70 ± 0.12 mm), A3D (0.66 ± 0.11 mm), A2D (0.62 ± 0.12 mm), and A15D (0.78 ± 0.11 mm) showed significantly higher MBL than groups 1 and 2, with no statistical difference among them.

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate abutments of 2-3 mm resulted in lower MBL compared to 1.5 mm immediate abutments or any delayed abutments.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study provides data on the optimal combination of intermediate abutment height and placement timing in preventing MBL.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trial registration number: NCT06667531. link: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06667531 .

摘要

目的

确定基台高度和植入时机的最有效组合,以减少边缘骨丢失(MBL)。

材料与方法

54例患者在用于替换后牙的种植体上接受至少一颗单颗螺丝固位冠(共60颗种植体)。根据中间基台高度(1.5毫米、2毫米、3毫米)和植入时机(即刻:手术1;延迟:手术2)将种植体分为六组:A3I组(高度3,手术1)、A2I组(高度2,手术1)、A15I组(高度1.5,手术1)、A3D组(高度3,手术2)、A2D组(高度2,手术2)、A15D组(高度1.5,手术2)。在五个随访点进行近中和远中线性影像学测量:种植手术、冠修复(T1)以及加载后3个月(T2)、6个月(T3)和12个月(T4)。比较各组的部分和总体MBL。

结果

12个月后,A3I组(0.13±0.11毫米)和A2I组(0.24±0.11毫米)的MBL最低,两组之间无统计学差异。A15I组(0.70±0.12毫米)、A3D组(0.66±0.11毫米)、A2D组(0.62±0.12毫米)和A15D组(0.78±0.11毫米)的MBL显著高于第1组和第2组,它们之间无统计学差异。

结论

与1.5毫米即刻基台或任何延迟基台相比,2 - 3毫米的即刻基台导致更低的MBL。

临床意义

本研究提供了关于中间基台高度和植入时机在预防MBL方面的最佳组合的数据。

临床试验注册

临床试验注册号:NCT06667531。链接:https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06667531 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/910f/12058957/d97f7916df02/784_2025_6364_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/910f/12058957/3eaa2161d4cb/784_2025_6364_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/910f/12058957/da746591965d/784_2025_6364_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/910f/12058957/31843dbe95dc/784_2025_6364_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/910f/12058957/a598f509b7e1/784_2025_6364_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/910f/12058957/9b61793a6503/784_2025_6364_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/910f/12058957/d97f7916df02/784_2025_6364_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/910f/12058957/3eaa2161d4cb/784_2025_6364_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/910f/12058957/da746591965d/784_2025_6364_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/910f/12058957/31843dbe95dc/784_2025_6364_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/910f/12058957/a598f509b7e1/784_2025_6364_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/910f/12058957/9b61793a6503/784_2025_6364_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/910f/12058957/d97f7916df02/784_2025_6364_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Influence of intermediate abutment height and timing of placement on marginal bone loss in single implant-supported crowns: a 12-month follow-up randomized clinical trial.中间基台高度和植入时机对单颗种植体支持冠边缘骨吸收的影响:一项12个月随访的随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 May 8;29(6):291. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06364-8.
2
Angulated titanium bases screw channel abutments for single implant restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.用于单颗种植体修复的成角钛基台螺丝通道基台:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Prosthodont. 2025 Mar;34(3):240-251. doi: 10.1111/jopr.14032. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
3
Full-Zirconia Single Molar Implant-Supported Restorations With Angulated Screw Channel Abutments: 5-Year Results of a Prospective Case Series Study.带角度螺丝通道基台的全锆单颗磨牙种植支持修复体:一项前瞻性病例系列研究的5年结果
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Jun;27(3):e70068. doi: 10.1111/cid.70068.
4
Do repeated changes of abutments have any influence on the stability of peri-implant tissues? Four-month post-loading preliminary results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.种植体基台的反复更换对种植体周围组织的稳定性有影响吗?一项多中心随机对照试验的4个月加载后初步结果。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2015 Summer;8(2):129-40.
5
The influence of implant depth, abutment height and mucosal phenotype on peri‑implant bone levels: A 2-year clinical trial.种植体植入深度、基台高度和黏膜表型对种植体周围骨水平的影响:一项为期2年的临床试验。
J Dent. 2024 Sep;148:105264. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105264. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
6
Do repeated changes of abutments have any influence on the stability of peri-implant tissues? One-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.种植体基台的反复更换对种植体周围组织的稳定性有影响吗?一项多中心随机对照试验的一年加载后结果。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017;10(1):57-72.
7
Immediate Loading Using the Digitalized Customized Restoration of Single-tooth Implants Placed in Fresh Extraction Sockets in the Aesthetic Anterior Maxilla: A 10-Year Prospective Study of Marginal Bone Level.数字化定制修复在美学上前牙即刻负载单个种植体植入后牙槽窝:10 年边缘骨水平的前瞻性研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2024 Mar 19;25(3):213-220. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3659.
8
Biological width establishment around dental implants is influenced by abutment height irrespective of vertical mucosal thickness: A cluster randomized controlled trial.种植体周围生物学宽度的建立受基台高度影响,而与垂直黏膜厚度无关:一项集群随机对照试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 Jul;30(7):649-659. doi: 10.1111/clr.13450. Epub 2019 May 12.
9
Immediate positioning of a definitive abutment versus repeated abutment replacements in post-extractive implants: 3-year follow-up of a randomised multicentre clinical trial.拔牙后种植体中即刻植入定制基台与多次更换基台的对比:一项随机多中心临床试验的3年随访
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010 Winter;3(4):285-96.
10
Influence of the abutment height and connection timing in early peri-implant marginal bone changes: A prospective randomized clinical trial.基台高度和连接时机对种植体早期边缘骨变化的影响:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Sep;29(9):907-914. doi: 10.1111/clr.13343.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of one-time abutment placement on clinical and radiographic outcomes: A 5-year randomized clinical trial.一次性基台放置对临床和影像学结果的影响:一项为期 5 年的随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024 Jun;35(6):609-620. doi: 10.1111/clr.14256. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
2
Relevant domains, core outcome sets and measurements for implant dentistry clinical trials: The Implant Dentistry Core Outcome Set and Measurement (ID-COSM) international consensus report.种植义齿临床试验的相关领域、核心结局指标和测量:种植义齿核心结局指标和测量(ID-COSM)国际共识报告。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023 May;34 Suppl 25:4-21. doi: 10.1111/clr.14074.
3
Influence of the abutment height on marginal bone level changes around two-piece dental implants: Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials.
基台高度对两段式牙科种植体周围边缘骨水平变化的影响:随机临床试验的荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023 Feb;34(2):81-94. doi: 10.1111/clr.14025. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
4
Early marginal bone loss around dental implants to define success in implant dentistry: A retrospective study.种植体周围早期边缘骨丧失对种植体牙科成功的定义:一项回顾性研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022 Oct;24(5):630-642. doi: 10.1111/cid.13122. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
5
Bone-level changes around implants with 1- or 3-mm-high abutments and their relation to crestal mucosal thickness: A 1-year randomized clinical trial.种植体周围 1 或 3mm 高基台的骨水平变化及其与颊侧黏膜厚度的关系:一项为期 1 年的随机临床试验。
J Clin Periodontol. 2021 Oct;48(10):1302-1311. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13505. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
6
Early peri-implant bone loss as a predictor for peri-implantitis: A 10-year prospective cohort study.种植体周围早期骨丧失作为种植体周围炎的预测指标:一项为期 10 年的前瞻性队列研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Jun;23(3):298-308. doi: 10.1111/cid.13000. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
7
The influence of new immediate tissue level abutment on crestal bone stability of subcrestally placed implants: A 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial.新即刻水平基台对种植体颊侧骨壁放置后近中颊骨稳定性的影响:一项为期 1 年的随机对照临床试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Apr;23(2):259-269. doi: 10.1111/cid.12979. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
8
Influence of implant mucosal thickness on early bone loss: a systematic review with meta-analysis.种植体黏膜厚度对早期骨吸收的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2020 Aug;50(4):209-225. doi: 10.5051/jpis.1904440222. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
9
What Are the Effects of Different Abutment Morphologies on Peri-implant Hard and Soft Tissue Behavior? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.不同基台形态对种植体周围软硬组织影响的研究:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Prosthodont. 2020 May/Jun;33(3):297-306. doi: 10.11607/ijp.6577.
10
The Long-Term Effect of Smoking on 10 Years' Survival and Success of Dental Implants: A Prospective Analysis of 453 Implants in a Non-University Setting.吸烟对牙种植体10年生存率及成功率的长期影响:非大学环境中453颗种植体的前瞻性分析
J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 8;9(4):1056. doi: 10.3390/jcm9041056.