• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

缺失数据对重复交叉多期两臂平行群组随机临床试验设计效率的影响。

The effect of missing data on design efficiency in repeated cross-sectional multi-period two-arm parallel cluster randomized trials.

机构信息

Department of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University, PO Box 80140, 3508 TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2021 Aug;53(4):1731-1745. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01529-7. Epub 2021 Feb 2.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-020-01529-7
PMID:33528816
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8367915/
Abstract

The reduced efficiency of the cluster randomized trial design may be compensated by implementing a multi-period design. The trial then becomes longitudinal, with a risk of intermittently missing observations and dropout. This paper studies the effect of missing data on design efficiency in trials where the periods are the days of the week and clusters are followed for at least one week. The multilevel model with a decaying correlation structure is used to relate outcome to period and treatment condition. The variance of the treatment effect estimator is used to measure efficiency. When there is no data loss, efficiency increases with increasing number of subjects per day and number of weeks. Different weekly measurement schemes are used to evaluate the impact of planned missing data designs: the loss of efficiency due to measuring on fewer days is largest for few subjects per day and few weeks. Dropout is modeled by the Weibull survival function. The loss of efficiency due to dropout increases when more clusters drop out during the course of the trial, especially if the risk of dropout is largest at the beginning of the trial. The largest loss is observed for few subjects per day and a large number of weeks. An example of the effect of waiting room environments in reducing stress in dental care shows how different design options can be compared. An R Shiny app allows researchers to interactively explore various design options and to choose the best design for their trial.

摘要

群随机试验设计效率的降低可以通过采用多周期设计来补偿。试验随后成为纵向的,存在间歇性缺失观测值和脱落的风险。本文研究了在以周为周期且将群组至少随访一周的试验中,缺失数据对设计效率的影响。使用具有衰减相关结构的多水平模型将结果与周期和处理条件联系起来。用处理效果估计值的方差来衡量效率。当没有数据丢失时,效率随每天的受试者数量和每周的数量增加而增加。使用不同的每周测量方案来评估计划缺失数据设计的影响:每天受试者数量较少且每周较少时,由于测量天数减少而导致的效率损失最大。使用 Weibull 生存函数对脱落进行建模。在试验过程中,随着越来越多的群组脱落,由于脱落导致的效率损失增加,特别是如果脱落的风险在试验开始时最大。每天受试者数量较少且每周较多时,观察到的损失最大。一个减少牙科护理压力的候诊室环境的例子展示了如何比较不同的设计方案。一个 R Shiny 应用程序允许研究人员交互式探索各种设计方案,并为他们的试验选择最佳设计。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8886/8367915/b046b96f9b8a/13428_2020_1529_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8886/8367915/c3148d76c51e/13428_2020_1529_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8886/8367915/c8728250c16e/13428_2020_1529_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8886/8367915/363fac0daa6c/13428_2020_1529_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8886/8367915/f7cf5ec835cd/13428_2020_1529_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8886/8367915/a24ce0730a13/13428_2020_1529_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8886/8367915/b046b96f9b8a/13428_2020_1529_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8886/8367915/c3148d76c51e/13428_2020_1529_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8886/8367915/c8728250c16e/13428_2020_1529_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8886/8367915/363fac0daa6c/13428_2020_1529_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8886/8367915/f7cf5ec835cd/13428_2020_1529_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8886/8367915/a24ce0730a13/13428_2020_1529_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8886/8367915/b046b96f9b8a/13428_2020_1529_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The effect of missing data on design efficiency in repeated cross-sectional multi-period two-arm parallel cluster randomized trials.缺失数据对重复交叉多期两臂平行群组随机临床试验设计效率的影响。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Aug;53(4):1731-1745. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01529-7. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
2
The cluster randomized crossover trial: The effects of attrition in the AB/BA design and how to account for it in sample size calculations.群组随机交叉试验:AB/BA 设计中损耗的影响及其在样本量计算中的处理方法。
Clin Trials. 2020 Aug;17(4):420-429. doi: 10.1177/1740774520913042. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Optimal design of cluster randomized crossover trials with a continuous outcome: Optimal number of time periods and treatment switches under a fixed number of clusters or fixed budget.具有连续结局的群组随机交叉试验的最优设计:在固定数量的群组或固定预算下,最佳的时间段和治疗转换数量。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec;56(8):8820-8830. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02505-1. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
5
The mixed model for repeated measures for cluster randomized trials: a simulation study investigating bias and type I error with missing continuous data.群组随机试验重复测量混合模型:一项模拟研究调查缺失连续数据的偏倚和 I 类错误
Trials. 2020 Feb 7;21(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4114-9.
6
PROTECT Trial: A cluster-randomized study with hydroxychloroquine versus observational support for prevention or early-phase treatment of Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.PROTECT 试验:羟氯喹对比观察支持用于预防或 COVID-19 早期治疗的一项集群随机对照研究:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Jul 31;21(1):689. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04527-4.
7
Impact of non-uniform correlation structure on sample size and power in multiple-period cluster randomised trials.多周期整群随机临床试验中非均匀相关结构对样本量和功效的影响。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Mar;28(3):703-716. doi: 10.1177/0962280217734981. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
8
Relative efficiency of unequal cluster sizes in stepped wedge and other trial designs under longitudinal or cross-sectional sampling.纵向或横截面抽样下不等群集大小在阶梯楔形和其他试验设计中的相对效率。
Stat Med. 2018 Dec 30;37(30):4652-4664. doi: 10.1002/sim.7943. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
9
Optimal designs using generalized estimating equations in cluster randomized crossover and stepped wedge trials.使用广义估计方程的最优设计在群组随机交叉和阶梯楔形试验中。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 Aug;33(8):1299-1330. doi: 10.1177/09622802241247717. Epub 2024 May 30.
10
The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials.不同聚类大小对横向阶段-推移群组随机试验的影响。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jun 14;19(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0760-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal design of cluster randomized crossover trials with a continuous outcome: Optimal number of time periods and treatment switches under a fixed number of clusters or fixed budget.具有连续结局的群组随机交叉试验的最优设计:在固定数量的群组或固定预算下,最佳的时间段和治疗转换数量。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec;56(8):8820-8830. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02505-1. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
2
Optimal allocation to treatment sequences in individually randomized stepped-wedge designs with attrition.在存在损耗的个体随机化阶梯式楔形设计中对治疗序列的最优分配。
Clin Trials. 2023 Jun;20(3):242-251. doi: 10.1177/17407745231154260. Epub 2023 Feb 24.

本文引用的文献

1
The cluster randomized crossover trial: The effects of attrition in the AB/BA design and how to account for it in sample size calculations.群组随机交叉试验:AB/BA 设计中损耗的影响及其在样本量计算中的处理方法。
Clin Trials. 2020 Aug;17(4):420-429. doi: 10.1177/1740774520913042. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
2
Cluster randomised trials with different numbers of measurements at baseline and endline: Sample size and optimal allocation.集群随机对照试验中,基线和终线的测量次数不同:样本量和最佳分配。
Clin Trials. 2020 Feb;17(1):69-76. doi: 10.1177/1740774519873888. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
3
Accounting for a decaying correlation structure in cluster randomized trials with continuous recruitment.
在连续招募的群组随机试验中考虑衰减相关结构。
Stat Med. 2019 May 20;38(11):1918-1934. doi: 10.1002/sim.8089. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
4
Information content of cluster-period cells in stepped wedge trials.阶梯楔形试验中聚类周期细胞的信息含量
Biometrics. 2019 Mar;75(1):144-152. doi: 10.1111/biom.12959. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
5
Sample size estimation for heterogeneous growth curve models with attrition.具有流失的异质增长曲线模型的样本量估计。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Jun;51(3):1216-1243. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1059-y.
6
Impact of non-uniform correlation structure on sample size and power in multiple-period cluster randomised trials.多周期整群随机临床试验中非均匀相关结构对样本量和功效的影响。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Mar;28(3):703-716. doi: 10.1177/0962280217734981. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
7
Sample size calculation for stepped wedge and other longitudinal cluster randomised trials.阶梯楔形及其他纵向整群随机试验的样本量计算
Stat Med. 2016 Nov 20;35(26):4718-4728. doi: 10.1002/sim.7028. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
8
The Impact of Covariates on Statistical Power in Cluster Randomized Designs: Which Level Matters More?协变量对整群随机设计中统计功效的影响:哪个层次更重要?
Multivariate Behav Res. 2012 Jun 18;47(3):392-420. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2012.673898.
9
Search for efficient complete and planned missing data designs for analysis of change.寻找用于变化分析的高效完整且有计划的缺失数据设计。
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Sep;48(3):1047-61. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0629-5.
10
Cluster randomised trials with repeated cross sections: alternatives to parallel group designs.具有重复横断面的整群随机试验:平行组设计的替代方案
BMJ. 2015 Jun 8;350:h2925. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2925.