Salihu Hamisu M, Dongarwar Deepa, Harris Toi B
Center of Excellence in Health Equity, Training and Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Int J MCH AIDS. 2020;9(Suppl 3):S1-S45. doi: 10.21106/ijma.431. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
This year's summit was unique given the COVID-19 pandemic: a major global outbreak that has imposed severe restrictions in all aspects of our life. At the outset, we were faced with three mutually exclusive options. First option was to cancel the summit in its entirety: this was the easiest and most obvious choice once the COVID-19 pandemic forced a near total lockdown all over the country with unprecedented disruptions of normal daily activities as the disease announced its thunderous touchdown on United States (US) soil. It was also the most-logical response faced with uncertainty regarding summit logistics and expected poor attendance due to the raging pandemic. Second option was to conduct a digital summit restricted to local audiences at Baylor College of Medicine: this option entailed implementing a virtual summit with attendance restricted to participants from our institution only. It sounded like a reasonable choice but that would impede the presence of diversity of topics, perspectives, insights and experiential learning opportunities, which are what render the summit exciting and worth attending. And finally, the last option was to conduct a digital unrestricted summit open to all interested audiences throughout the US. The conduct of a virtual summit open to all participants from around the country was initially considered daunting given the likelihood of amplified technical problems associated with an array of internet access differentials around the country, which would require a strong Information Technology (IT) presence throughout the sessions. Nonetheless, the attractiveness of going national with a virtual summit, despite the pandemic and logistical challenges, slowly gained converts and became the dominant choice. The response and level of participation in this first virtual summit showed an unanticipated surge despite the increase in registration fees to cover IT costs. This year, we had attendees from all regions of the US as well as from the United Kingdom. The range of topics was quite diverse encompassing health disparities in relation to cancers, nutrition, musculo-skeletal disorders, amputation rates, vaccination uptakes and COVID-19 infections. Various solutions were passionately presented to address these disparities including novel health technologies, community engagement and partnerships, improvement in health literacy and alternative therapeutics. There were no hitches despite the complex breakout sessions, and above all, attendees were satisfied and offered outstanding evaluation scores. This was definitely a summit that metamorphosed from pessimism to a triumphant success! .
鉴于新冠疫情,今年的峰会别具一格:这是一场重大的全球疫情,对我们生活的方方面面都施加了严格限制。一开始,我们面临三个相互排斥的选择。第一个选择是完全取消峰会:在新冠疫情迫使全国几乎全面封锁,正常日常活动受到前所未有的干扰,疫情在美国本土肆虐之时,这是最容易且最明显的选择。这也是面对峰会后勤方面的不确定性以及由于疫情肆虐预计参会人数不佳时最合理的回应。第二个选择是举办一场仅限贝勒医学院当地观众参加的数字峰会:这个选择需要举办一场虚拟峰会,仅限本校参与者参加。这听起来是个合理的选择,但这会妨碍主题、观点、见解和体验式学习机会的多样性,而正是这些使得峰会令人兴奋且值得参加。最后,第三个选择是举办一场面向全美国所有感兴趣观众的无限制数字峰会。鉴于全国各地存在一系列不同的互联网接入情况,可能会出现更多技术问题,这在会议全程都需要强大的信息技术支持,所以一开始举办一场面向全国所有参与者的虚拟峰会被认为是艰巨的任务。尽管如此,尽管面临疫情和后勤挑战,举办一场面向全国的虚拟峰会的吸引力还是慢慢赢得了支持者,并成为了主导选择。尽管提高了注册费用以支付信息技术成本,但首次虚拟峰会的反响和参与程度却意外地大幅上升。今年,我们有来自美国所有地区以及英国的参会者。主题范围非常广泛,涵盖了与癌症、营养、肌肉骨骼疾病、截肢率、疫苗接种率和新冠病毒感染相关的健康差异。为解决这些差异,人们热情地提出了各种解决方案,包括新型健康技术、社区参与和伙伴关系、健康素养的提高以及替代疗法。尽管分组会议很复杂,但一切都很顺利,最重要的是,参会者很满意并给出了出色的评价分数。这绝对是一场从悲观转变为巨大成功的峰会!