Suppr超能文献

乌干达产科和新生儿护理质量中的知行差距:农村卫生机构的横断面研究。

Know-do gaps in obstetric and newborn care quality in Uganda: a cross-sectional study in rural health facilities.

机构信息

Department of Health Behavior, Society & Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA.

Geary Institute for Public Policy, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Trop Med Int Health. 2021 May;26(5):535-545. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13557. Epub 2021 Mar 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Variable and inadequate quality of maternity care is a critical factor in persistently high rates of maternal and neonatal mortality in Uganda. We investigated whether provider quality of care deviates from knowledge and the factors associated with these 'know-do gaps' in Ugandan maternity facilities.

METHODS

Data were collected from 109 providers in 40 facilities. Quality was measured using direct observations of intrapartum care, and scores were based on the percentage of essential care actions provided out of a 20-item validated quality index. Knowledge was measured based on the percentage of items that providers reported knowing to do using vignette surveys. The know-do gap was the difference between knowledge and quality. Multivariable models were used to assess the association between provider- and facility-level characteristics and knowledge, quality and know-do gaps.

RESULTS

The average quality score was 45%, with quality varying widely within and across providers. The mean knowledge score was 70%, yielding a mean know-do gap of 25%. Know-do gaps were largest for practices related to infection control, vitals monitoring, and prevention of postpartum haemorrhage. The association between quality and knowledge scores was positive but small (P = 0.08), so know-do gaps were largest for providers with the highest knowledge scores. Greater provider training was positively associated with knowledge (P = 0.005) but not with quality (P = 0.60). Having 10 or more years of work experience was associated with higher quality scores (5.3, 95%CI: 0.6 to 10.1), while higher patient volumes were associated with lower quality scores (-2.2, 95%CI: -3.7 to - 0.07). None of the factors of provider motivation, cadre, availability of essential medicines and supplies or facility staffing were associated with quality or know-do gaps.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that, in Uganda, gaps between knowledge and quality do not appear to be explained by factors such as lack of motivation, education, training or supplies. Gaps are particularly large for essential practices related to prevention of postpartum haemorrhage, a leading cause of maternal mortality in Uganda and similar settings.

摘要

目的

在乌干达,产妇和新生儿死亡率居高不下的一个关键因素是,产妇护理的质量参差不齐且不达标。我们研究了医护人员的护理质量是否存在差异,并分析了造成这种知识与实践(“知-行”)差距的相关因素,这些因素与乌干达的产科医疗机构有关。

方法

数据来自 40 家医疗机构的 109 名医护人员。通过直接观察分娩护理情况来衡量护理质量,评分基于提供的 20 项基本护理操作的百分比,使用的是经过验证的质量指数。知识是根据医护人员在情景调查中报告的了解程度的百分比来衡量的。“知-行”差距是指知识和质量之间的差异。采用多变量模型来评估提供者和医疗机构的特征与知识、质量和“知-行”差距之间的关系。

结果

平均质量评分为 45%,提供者之间的质量差异很大。平均知识评分为 70%,“知-行”差距平均为 25%。与感染控制、生命体征监测和预防产后出血相关的做法之间的差距最大。质量与知识评分之间的关联是正相关的,但很小(P=0.08),因此知识评分最高的提供者之间的差距最大。更多的提供者培训与知识呈正相关(P=0.005),但与质量无关(P=0.60)。拥有 10 年或更长工作经验与更高的质量评分相关(5.3,95%CI:0.6 至 10.1),而更高的患者量与更低的质量评分相关(-2.2,95%CI:-3.7 至-0.07)。提供者的激励因素、资质、基本药物和用品的供应情况或医疗机构人员配备等因素均与质量或“知-行”差距无关。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,在乌干达,知识与质量之间的差距似乎不是由缺乏动机、教育、培训或供应等因素造成的。与预防产后出血等基本做法相关的差距特别大,产后出血是乌干达和类似环境中产妇死亡的主要原因。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验