Center for Advancing Population Science, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Center for Advancing Population Science, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
J Affect Disord. 2021 Mar 15;283:94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.01.048. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
Understanding the association between separate and combined mental and physical health diagnoses and COVID-19 outcomes is greatly needed to address the severity of illness.
Data on 24,034 patients screened for COVID-19 as of July 2020 were extracted from the Froedtert/Medical College of Wisconsin Epic medical record. COVID-19 outcomes were defined as positive screens, proportion hospitalized among positive screens, and proportion that died among positive and hospitalized population. The primary independent variable was a 3-category variable: physical health diagnosis alone, mental health diagnosis alone, and combined mental and physical health diagnoses. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the independent relationship between separate and combined diagnoses and COVID-19 outcomes.
Compared to physical health diagnosis alone, mental health diagnosis alone had lower odds of screening positive (OR=0.68, CI=0.51;0.92) and was not associated with hospitalization or mortality among positive screens. Combined had lower odds of screening positive (OR=0.78, CI=0.69;0.88) and higher odds of hospitalization among positive screens after adjusting for demographics (OR=1.58, CI=1.20;2.08) but lost significance in the fully adjusted model. No category of diagnoses was associated with mortality.
Analysis is cross-sectional and cannot speak to any causal relationships.
Overall, compared to physical health diagnosis alone, mental health diagnosis and combined had lower odds of positive screens. However, individuals with combined were more likely to be hospitalized, after adjusting for demographics only. These findings add new evidence for risk of COVID-19 and related hospitalization in individuals who have a physical and mental health diagnosis.
为了了解精神和身体的健康诊断的单独和合并对 COVID-19 结果的影响,我们迫切需要了解疾病的严重程度。
截至 2020 年 7 月,从 Froedtert/威斯康星医学院 Epic 医疗记录中提取了 24034 名筛查 COVID-19 的患者的数据。COVID-19 的结果定义为阳性筛查、阳性筛查中住院的比例以及阳性和住院人群中的死亡比例。主要的独立变量是一个 3 类变量:单独的身体健康诊断、单独的心理健康诊断以及合并的精神和身体健康诊断。使用逻辑回归和 Cox 比例风险模型来检验单独和合并诊断与 COVID-19 结果之间的独立关系。
与单独的身体健康诊断相比,单独的心理健康诊断的阳性筛查几率较低(OR=0.68,CI=0.51;0.92),且与阳性筛查中的住院或死亡无关。合并后的阳性筛查几率较低(OR=0.78,CI=0.69;0.88),且在调整人口统计学因素后,阳性筛查中的住院几率较高(OR=1.58,CI=1.20;2.08),但在完全调整的模型中失去了意义。没有一个诊断类别与死亡率有关。
分析是横断面的,不能说明任何因果关系。
总体而言,与单独的身体健康诊断相比,心理健康诊断和合并后的诊断的阳性筛查几率较低。然而,在仅调整人口统计学因素后,患有合并症的个体更有可能住院。这些发现为患有身心健康诊断的个体 COVID-19 及相关住院的风险增加提供了新的证据。