1Section of Interventional Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
2Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany; and.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Feb 2;19(3):307-318. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7619.
This study sought to assess microsatellite and KRAS status, prevalence, and impact on outcome in stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC).
The 2010 to 2016 US National Cancer Database was queried for adult patients with stage IV CRC. Prevalence of microsatellite status (microsatellite instability-high [MSI-H] or microsatellite stable [MSS]) and KRAS status (KRAS mutation or wild-type) of the primary CRC was assessed. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models in patients with complete data on both microsatellite and KRAS status and information on follow-up.
Information on microsatellite and KRAS status was available for 10,844 and 25,712 patients, respectively, and OS data were available for 5,904 patients. The overall prevalence of MSI-H status and KRAS mutation was 3.1% and 42.4%, respectively. Prevalence of MSI-H ranged between 1.6% (rectosigmoid junction) and 5.2% (transverse colon), and between 34.7% (sigmoid colon) and 58.2% (cecum) for KRAS mutation. MSI-H rates were highest in East North Central US states (4.1%), and KRAS mutation rates were highest in West South Central US states (44.1%). Multivariable analyses revealed longer OS for patients with KRAS wild-type versus mutation status (hazard ratio [HR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.97; P=.004), those with MSS versus MSI-H status (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62-0.9; P=.003), and those with left-sided versus right-sided CRC (multivariable HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.6-0.7; P<.001). The effect of KRAS mutation further varied with CRC site and microsatellite status (P=.002 for interaction).
Depending on the primary site and US geography, stage IV CRC shows distinct mutational behavior. KRAS mutation, MSI-H, and primary CRC sidedness independently affect OS and interact with distinct prognostic profiles. Generically classifying adenocarcinomas at different sites as CRC might deprecate this diversity.
本研究旨在评估 IV 期结直肠癌(CRC)中微卫星和 KRAS 状态、流行率及其对结局的影响。
2010 年至 2016 年,美国国家癌症数据库对 IV 期 CRC 成年患者进行了查询。评估了原发性 CRC 中微卫星状态(微卫星不稳定高[MSI-H]或微卫星稳定[MSS])和 KRAS 状态(KRAS 突变或野生型)的流行率。在具有完整微卫星和 KRAS 状态数据以及随访信息的患者中,使用多变量 Cox 比例风险模型评估总生存(OS)。
分别有 10844 名和 25712 名患者的微卫星和 KRAS 状态信息可用,5904 名患者的 OS 数据可用。MSI-H 状态和 KRAS 突变的总体流行率分别为 3.1%和 42.4%。MSI-H 发生率在 1.6%(直肠乙状结肠交界处)至 5.2%(横结肠)之间,KRAS 突变发生率在 34.7%(乙状结肠)至 58.2%(盲肠)之间。MSI-H 发生率在中北部美国各州最高(4.1%),KRAS 突变发生率在中南部美国各州最高(44.1%)。多变量分析显示,KRAS 野生型患者的 OS 长于突变型患者(风险比[HR],0.91;95%CI,0.85-0.97;P=.004),MSS 患者的 OS 长于 MSI-H 患者(HR,0.75;95%CI,0.62-0.90;P=.003),左侧患者的 OS 长于右侧患者(多变量 HR,0.65;95%CI,0.60-0.7;P<.001)。KRAS 突变的影响还随 CRC 部位和微卫星状态而变化(交互作用 P=.002)。
根据原发部位和美国地理位置,IV 期 CRC 表现出不同的突变行为。KRAS 突变、MSI-H 和原发 CRC 侧别独立影响 OS,并与不同的预后特征相互作用。将不同部位的腺癌笼统地归类为 CRC 可能会忽略这种多样性。