Faculty of Postgraduate Medicine, Khesar Gyalpo University of Medical Sciences of Bhutan, Gongphel Lam, Thimphu, 11001, Bhutan.
Department of Internal Medicine, Armed Forces Medical College, Maharashtra University of Medical Sciences, Pune, India.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Feb 2;21(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03580-4.
The third Sustainable Development Goal for 2030 development agenda aims to reduce maternal and newborn deaths. Pregnant women's understanding of danger signs is an important factor in seeking timely care during emergencies. We assessed knowledge of obstetric danger signs using both recall and understanding of appropriate action required during obstetric emergencies.
This was a cross-sectional study among pregnant women attending antenatal clinic at Bhutan's largest hospital in Thimphu. Recall was assessed against seven obstetric danger signs outlined in the Mother and Child Health Handbook (7 points). Understanding of danger signs was tested using 13 multiple choice questions (13 points). Knowledge was scored out of 20 points and reported as 'good' (≥80%), 'satisfactory' (60-79%) and 'poor' (< 60%). Correlation between participant characteristics and knowledge score as well as number of danger signs recalled was tested using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Association between knowledge score and participant characteristics was tested using t-tests (and Kruskal-Wallis test) for numeric variables. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics associated with the level of knowledge ('good' versus 'satisfactory' and 'poor' combined) were assessed with odds ratios using a log-binomial regression model. All results with p < 0.05 were considered significant.
Four hundred and twenty-two women responded to the survey (response rate = 96.0%). Mean (±SD) knowledge score was 12 (±2.5). Twenty women (4.7%) had 'good' knowledge, 245 (58.1%) had 'satisfactory' knowledge and 157 (37.2%) had 'poor' knowledge. The median number of danger signs recalled was 2 (IQR 1, 3) while 68 women (20.3%) could not recall any danger signs. Most women were knowledgeable about pre-labour rupture of membranes (96.0%) while very few women were knowledgeable about spotting during pregnancy (19.9%). Both knowledge score and number of danger signs recalled had significant correlation with the period of gestation. Women with previous surgery on the reproductive tract had higher odds of having 'good' level of knowledge.
Most pregnant women had 'satisfactory' knowledge score with poor explicit recall of danger signs. However, women recognized obstetric emergencies and identified the appropriate action warranted.
2030 年可持续发展议程的第三个目标旨在降低孕产妇和新生儿死亡率。孕妇对危险信号的认识是在紧急情况下及时寻求护理的重要因素。我们评估了使用回忆和理解产科紧急情况下所需的适当行动来识别产科危险信号的知识。
这是在不丹最大的医院——廷布的产前诊所进行的一项横断面研究。对《母婴保健手册》中概述的七种产科危险信号进行回忆评估(7 分)。使用 13 个多项选择题(13 分)来测试对危险信号的理解。知识以 20 分制评分,并报告为“良好”(≥80%)、“满意”(60-79%)和“差”(<60%)。使用 Pearson 相关系数测试参与者特征与知识评分以及回忆的危险信号数量之间的相关性。使用 t 检验(和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验)测试知识评分与参与者特征之间的关联对于数值变量。使用对数二项回归模型评估与知识水平相关的社会人口学和临床特征(“良好”与“满意”和“差”的组合)的比值比。p 值<0.05 的所有结果均被认为具有统计学意义。
422 名妇女对调查做出了回应(应答率=96.0%)。平均(±SD)知识得分为 12(±2.5)。20 名妇女(4.7%)具有“良好”的知识,245 名妇女(58.1%)具有“满意”的知识,157 名妇女(37.2%)具有“差”的知识。回忆的危险信号中位数为 2(IQR 1, 3),而 68 名妇女(20.3%)无法回忆任何危险信号。大多数妇女对产前胎膜早破有一定的认识(96.0%),而很少有妇女对怀孕期间的出血有认识(19.9%)。知识评分和回忆的危险信号数量都与妊娠周期有显著相关性。有生殖道既往手术史的妇女具有更高的“良好”知识水平的可能性。
大多数孕妇的知识得分“满意”,但对危险信号的明确回忆较差。然而,妇女认识到产科急症,并确定了需要采取的适当行动。