• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2.0mm 与 3.5mm 螺钉增强治疗锁骨中段骨折的可比结果:10 年经验。

Comparable results using 2.0-mm vs. 3.5-mm screw augmentation in midshaft clavicle fractures: a 10-year experience.

机构信息

Department of Trauma Surgery, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.

Department of Radiology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Med Res. 2021 Feb 2;26(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40001-021-00487-w.

DOI:10.1186/s40001-021-00487-w
PMID:33531034
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7851941/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Absence of cortical alignment in wedge-shaped and multifragmentary fractures (Fx) results in decreased fixation stability. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome using 2.0- vs. 3.5-mm screws for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in dislocated, wedge-shaped or fragmentary midshaft clavicle fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients suffering from AO/OTA 15 2.A-C midshaft clavicle fractures were operatively treated between 2008 and 2018. 2.0- or 3.5-mm cortical screws were used to restore anatomic alignment in dislocated, wedge-shaped and fragmentary clavicle fractures. Data of radiologic outcome were collected until fracture consolidation was identified.

RESULTS

80 consecutive patients with a mean age of 44.5 ± 16.3 years, who were operatively treated for dislocated midshaft clavicle fractures were enrolled. 40 patients were treated using 2.0-mm and 40 patients using routine 3.5-mm cortical screws, respectively. Time to fracture consolidation was 12.8 ± 7.8 months. No mal- or non-unions occurred during routine follow-up until 18 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Restoring anatomic alignment in wedge or fragmentary clavicle fractures can ultimately be addressed using cortical screw augmentation. Both groups showed comparable results with respect to fracture reduction, fixation and stability as well as time to consolidation of the fracture, while the 2.0-mm screw diameter was associated with easier handling of small Fx fragments.

摘要

目的

楔形和多片段骨折(Fx)中皮质对线的缺失会导致固定稳定性降低。本研究的目的是比较使用 2.0-mm 和 3.5-mm 螺钉进行切开复位内固定(ORIF)治疗脱位、楔形或多片段锁骨中段骨折的效果。

材料和方法

2008 年至 2018 年间,对患有 AO/OTA 15 2.A-C 型锁骨中段骨折的患者进行了手术治疗。使用 2.0-mm 或 3.5-mm 皮质螺钉恢复脱位、楔形和多片段锁骨骨折的解剖对线。收集影像学结果数据,直到骨折愈合为止。

结果

共纳入 80 例连续患者,平均年龄 44.5±16.3 岁,均接受切开复位治疗。40 例患者使用 2.0-mm 皮质螺钉,40 例患者使用常规 3.5-mm 皮质螺钉。骨折愈合时间为 12.8±7.8 个月。在常规随访期间,直到术后 18 个月,均未发生畸形或不愈合。

结论

使用皮质螺钉增强可以最终解决楔形或多片段锁骨骨折的解剖对线问题。两组患者在骨折复位、固定和稳定性以及骨折愈合时间方面均具有可比性,而 2.0-mm 螺钉直径与处理小 Fx 片段更方便。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69ee/7851941/2f9cec0175aa/40001_2021_487_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69ee/7851941/675c8e57d07c/40001_2021_487_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69ee/7851941/2f9cec0175aa/40001_2021_487_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69ee/7851941/675c8e57d07c/40001_2021_487_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69ee/7851941/2f9cec0175aa/40001_2021_487_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparable results using 2.0-mm vs. 3.5-mm screw augmentation in midshaft clavicle fractures: a 10-year experience.2.0mm 与 3.5mm 螺钉增强治疗锁骨中段骨折的可比结果:10 年经验。
Eur J Med Res. 2021 Feb 2;26(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40001-021-00487-w.
2
[Surgical Treatment of Clavicle Midshaft Fractures - Prospective Randomized Trial].[锁骨中段骨折的手术治疗——前瞻性随机试验]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2020;87(2):101-107.
3
Risk factors for refracture after plate removal for midshaft clavicle fracture after bone union.骨愈合后锁骨中段骨折钢板取出后再骨折的危险因素。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Dec 21;14(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1516-z.
4
The comparison of Nice knots and traditional methods as an auxiliary reduction-fixation technique in pre-contoured locking plate fixation for comminuted Robinson type 2B clavicle fracture: A retrospective study.预弯锁定钢板固定粉碎性 Robinson 2B 型锁骨骨折中比较 Nice 结和传统方法作为辅助复位固定技术:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jun 11;100(23):e26282. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026282.
5
Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for clavicle fractures.锁骨骨折的微创钢板接骨术
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2023 Apr;35(2):92-99. doi: 10.1007/s00064-023-00798-7. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
6
[Intramedullary stabilisation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: does the fracture pattern (simple vs. complex) influence the anatomic and functional result].[移位型锁骨中段骨折的髓内固定:骨折类型(简单型与复杂型)是否会影响解剖学和功能结果]
Z Orthop Unfall. 2014 Dec;152(6):588-95. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1383206. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
7
Are clinical outcomes affected by type of plate used for management of mid-shaft clavicle fractures?锁骨中段骨折治疗中所使用钢板的类型是否会影响临床疗效?
J Orthop Traumatol. 2018 Aug 15;19(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s10195-018-0492-0.
8
Low-Profile Dual Small Plate Fixation Is Biomechanically Similar to Larger Superior or Anteroinferior Single Plate Fixation of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures.低切迹双小钢板固定与较大的锁骨中段骨折的上或前下单一钢板固定在生物力学上相似。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Sep;47(11):2678-2685. doi: 10.1177/0363546519865251. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
9
Comparative analysis of functional outcome of anatomical precontoured locking plate versus reconstruction plate in the management of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures.解剖预塑形锁定钢板与重建钢板治疗移位型锁骨中段骨折功能预后的比较分析
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019 Jan-Apr;27(1):2309499018820351. doi: 10.1177/2309499018820351.
10
Plate versus intramedullary fixation of two-part and multifragmentary displaced midshaft clavicle fractures - a long-term analysis.钢板与髓内固定治疗两部分及多段移位型锁骨中段骨折的长期分析
Injury. 2017 Nov;48 Suppl 5:S21-S26. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(17)30734-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Morphologic profiles of comminuted midshaft clavicle fractures: a preliminary study.粉碎性锁骨中段骨折的形态学特征:一项初步研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Feb 1;145(1):149. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05605-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Does implant removal of superior clavicle plate osteosynthesis affect the functional outcome: a prospective trial.锁骨肩峰端钢板内固定取出术是否影响功能结局:一项前瞻性试验。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Jan;142(1):139-144. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03669-z. Epub 2020 Nov 1.
2
[Clavicular fractures : Diagnostics, management and treatment].[锁骨骨折:诊断、处理与治疗]
Unfallchirurg. 2018 Dec;121(12):983-998. doi: 10.1007/s00113-018-0575-7.
3
Surgical fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures: A systematic review of biomechanical studies.
锁骨中段骨折的手术固定:生物力学研究的系统综述
Injury. 2018 Apr;49(4):753-765. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.02.017. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
4
Biomechanical comparison of three different plate configurations for comminuted clavicle midshaft fracture fixation.三种不同钢板构型治疗粉碎性锁骨中段骨折的生物力学比较。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Dec;26(12):2200-2205. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.06.034. Epub 2017 Oct 14.
5
Treatment Trends in Older Adults With Midshaft Clavicle Fractures.老年中段锁骨骨折患者的治疗趋势
J Hand Surg Am. 2017 Nov;42(11):875-882. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.06.099. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
6
Radiographic outcomes of single versus dual plate fixation of acute mid-shaft clavicle fractures.急性锁骨中段骨折单钢板与双钢板固定的影像学结果
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Jun;137(6):749-754. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2676-0. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
7
Mid-term outcome following revision surgery of clavicular non- and malunion using anatomic locking compression plate and iliac crest bone graft.使用解剖型锁定加压钢板和髂嵴植骨对锁骨不愈合和畸形愈合进行翻修手术后的中期结果。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Mar 29;18(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1488-2.
8
The importance of immediate total-body CT scanning.即时全身CT扫描的重要性。
Lancet. 2017 Feb 4;389(10068):502-503. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30232-5.
9
High Irritation and Removal Rates After Plate or Nail Fixation in Patients With Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures.移位型锁骨中段骨折患者钢板或髓内钉固定后高刺激率及取出率
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Feb;475(2):532-539. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5113-8. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
10
Trends in the Incidence of Clavicle Fractures and Surgical Repair in Sweden: 2001-2012.瑞典锁骨骨折及手术修复发生率的趋势:2001 - 2012年
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Nov 2;98(21):1837-1842. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01284.