• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Intraoperative perfusion assessment of the proximal colon by a visual grading system for safe anastomosis after resection in left-sided colorectal cancer patients.术中使用视觉分级系统评估左半结直肠癌患者切除术后近端结肠的灌注情况,以确保吻合口安全。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 2;11(1):2746. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82486-9.
2
Visualization and quantification of anastomotic perfusion in colorectal surgery using near-infrared fluorescence.使用近红外荧光技术对结直肠手术吻合口进行可视化和灌注定量评估。
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Oct;23(10):973-980. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02089-5. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
3
Perfusion assessment in laparoscopic left-sided/anterior resection (PILLAR II): a multi-institutional study.腹腔镜左半/前切除术的灌注评估(PILLAR II):一项多机构研究
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Jan;220(1):82-92.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.09.015. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
4
Intraoperative angiography with indocyanine green to assess anastomosis perfusion in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection: results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial.术中吲哚菁绿血管造影评估腹腔镜结直肠切除患者吻合口灌注:一项多中心随机对照试验的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):53-60. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06730-0. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
5
Indocyanine green-enhanced fluorescence to assess bowel perfusion during laparoscopic colorectal resection.吲哚菁绿增强荧光用于评估腹腔镜结直肠切除术中的肠灌注情况。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jul;30(7):2736-42. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4540-z. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
6
The Risk Factor of Anastomotic Hypoperfusion in Colorectal Surgery.结直肠手术吻合口血运灌注不足的风险因素。
J Surg Res. 2019 Dec;244:265-271. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.050. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
7
Efficacy of intraoperative ICG fluorescence imaging evaluation for preventing anastomotic leakage after left-sided colon or rectal cancer surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis.术中吲哚菁绿荧光成像评估对预防左半结肠癌或直肠癌手术后吻合口漏的疗效:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 May;35(5):2373-2385. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08230-y. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
8
[Fluorescence angiography in the detection of anastomotic perfusion during rectal and sigmoid resection - preliminary report].[荧光血管造影术在直肠和乙状结肠切除术中吻合口灌注检测中的应用——初步报告]
Rozhl Chir. 2016 Fall;95(10):354-358.
9
Achieving low anastomotic leak rates utilizing clinical perfusion assessment.利用临床灌注评估实现低吻合口漏发生率
Surgery. 2016 Oct;160(4):960-967. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
10
Should anastomotic assessment with flexible sigmoidoscopy be routine following laparoscopic restorative left colorectal resection?在腹腔镜左半结肠修复性切除术后,常规进行乙状结肠镜吻合口评估是否必要?
Colorectal Dis. 2015 Feb;17(2):160-4. doi: 10.1111/codi.12809.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.吲哚菁绿荧光成像在结直肠癌中的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Sep 10;40(1):193. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04941-7.
2
Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for Colorectal Surgery: A Health Technology Assessment.用于结直肠手术的吲哚菁绿荧光成像:一项卫生技术评估
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2025 Jul 10;25(3):1-124. eCollection 2025.
3
Preventing Anastomotic Leakage, a Devastating Complication of Colorectal Surgery.预防吻合口漏,结直肠手术的一种毁灭性并发症。
Ewha Med J. 2023 Dec;46(Suppl 1):e29. doi: 10.12771/emj.2023.e29. Epub 2023 Dec 31.
4
Establishing reference curves for vital tissue perfusion using quantitative near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green.使用吲哚菁绿定量近红外荧光成像建立重要组织灌注的参考曲线。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Jan 8;410(1):28. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03589-1.
5
The gut barrier as a gatekeeper in colorectal cancer treatment.肠道屏障作为结直肠癌治疗的守门员。
Oncotarget. 2024 Aug 14;15:562-572. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.28634.
6
Blood perfusion assessment by near-infrared fluorescence angiography of epiploic appendages in prevention of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for ultra-low rectal cancer: a case-matched study.经近红外荧光血管造影评估网膜阑尾血供在预防超低位直肠癌经肛门内括约肌间切除术吻合口漏中的作用:一项病例匹配研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Sep;38(9):5446-5456. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11085-2. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
7
The effect of pain-education nursing based on a mind map on postoperative pain score and quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer.思维导图为基础的疼痛教育护理对结直肠癌患者术后疼痛评分和生活质量的影响。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 May 12;102(19):e33562. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033562.
8
All-cause 30- and 90-day inpatient readmission costs associated with 4 minimally invasive colon surgery approaches: A propensity-matched analysis using Medicare and commercial claims data.4种微创结肠手术方法相关的全因30天和90天住院再入院费用:一项使用医疗保险和商业理赔数据的倾向匹配分析。
Surg Open Sci. 2022 Sep 25;10:158-164. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2022.09.007. eCollection 2022 Oct.
9
Mesenteric Vascular Evaluation with Pre-operative Multidetector Computed Tomographic Angiography and Intraoperative Indocyanine Green Angiography to Reduce Anastomotic Leaks after Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.术前多排螺旋 CT 血管造影和术中吲哚菁绿血管造影评估肠系膜血管以减少结直肠癌微创手术后吻合口漏的发生。
JSLS. 2022 Jul-Sep;26(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00022.

本文引用的文献

1
The influence of anastomotic leakage for rectal cancer oncologic outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.直肠癌吻合口漏对肿瘤学结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jun;121(8):1283-1297. doi: 10.1002/jso.25921. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
2
Fluorescence angiography with indocyanine green (ICG) to evaluate anastomosis in colorectal surgery: where does it have more value?荧光素血管造影术联合吲哚菁绿(ICG)评估结直肠手术吻合口:它的价值在哪里?
Surg Endosc. 2020 Sep;34(9):3897-3907. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07159-1. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
3
Intraoperative angiography with indocyanine green to assess anastomosis perfusion in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection: results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial.术中吲哚菁绿血管造影评估腹腔镜结直肠切除患者吻合口灌注:一项多中心随机对照试验的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):53-60. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06730-0. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
4
Diagnosis, treatment, and consequences of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery.结直肠手术中吻合口漏的诊断、治疗及后果
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Apr;32(4):549-556. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2744-x. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
5
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection: a retrospective analysis of 17 518 patients.结直肠切除术后吻合口漏的危险因素:对17518例患者的回顾性分析
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Mar;19(3):288-298. doi: 10.1111/codi.13476.
6
Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with double stapling technique anastomosis.腹腔镜低位前切除术采用双吻合器技术吻合术后吻合口漏的术前、术中和术后危险因素。
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jul 7;22(25):5718-27. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i25.5718.
7
Severe distal ischemic proctitis with venous congestion following anterior resection for sigmoid colon cancer: the importance of Sudeck's point.乙状结肠癌前切除术后伴有静脉淤血的严重远端缺血性直肠炎:舒德克点的重要性
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 May;31(5):1051-1052. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2381-9. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
8
The types of anastomotic leakage that develop following anterior resection for rectal cancer demonstrate distinct characteristics and oncologic outcomes.直肠癌前切除术后发生的吻合口漏类型表现出不同的特征和肿瘤学结局。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Nov;30(11):1533-40. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2359-7. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
9
Defining postoperative ileus: results of a systematic review and global survey.定义术后肠梗阻:系统评价和全球调查的结果。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 May;17(5):962-72. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2148-y. Epub 2013 Feb 2.
10
How to assess intestinal viability during surgery: A review of techniques.如何在手术中评估肠活力:技术综述。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 May 27;3(5):59-69. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v3.i5.59.

术中使用视觉分级系统评估左半结直肠癌患者切除术后近端结肠的灌注情况,以确保吻合口安全。

Intraoperative perfusion assessment of the proximal colon by a visual grading system for safe anastomosis after resection in left-sided colorectal cancer patients.

机构信息

Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.

Division of Nursing, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 2;11(1):2746. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82486-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-82486-9
PMID:33531598
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7854740/
Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the clinical feasibility of a new visual grading system. We included 50 patients who underwent resection of primary colorectal cancer. Before anastomosis, the marginal vessel was cut and the perfusion status was assessed by a visual grading system. The visual grading system is comprised of five grades according to the bleeding from the marginal vessel and is categorized into 4 groups: good (grade A and B), moderate (grade C), poor (grade D) and none (grade E). Colorectal anastomosis was performed only in the good and moderate groups. We compared postoperative outcomes between the good and moderate groups and analysed the factors affecting the perfusion grade. Among the patients, 48% were grade A, 12% were grade B, and 40% were grade C. There was no anastomotic leakage. Only one patient with grade C showed ischemic colitis and needed reoperation. Age was the only factor correlated with perfusion grade in multivariate analysis (OR 1.080, 95% CI 1.006-1.159, p = 0.034). The perfusion grades were significantly different between > 65 and < 65 year-old patients (> 65, A 29.2% B 12.5% C 58.3% vs. < 65, A 65.4% B 11.5% C 23.1%, p = 0.006). Our intraoperative perfusion assessment that uses a cutting method and a visual grading system is simple and useful for performing a safe anastomosis after colorectal resection. If the perfusion grade is better than grade C, an anastomosis can be performed safely. Age was found to be an important factor affecting the perfusion grade.

摘要

我们旨在评估一种新的视觉分级系统的临床可行性。我们纳入了 50 例接受原发性结直肠肿瘤切除术的患者。在吻合前,切断边缘血管,并通过视觉分级系统评估其灌注状态。该视觉分级系统根据边缘血管的出血情况分为 5 个等级,并分为 4 组:良好(A 级和 B 级)、中等(C 级)、较差(D 级)和无(E 级)。仅在良好和中等组进行结直肠吻合。我们比较了良好和中等组之间的术后结果,并分析了影响灌注等级的因素。在这些患者中,48%为 A 级,12%为 B 级,40%为 C 级。无吻合口漏。仅有 1 例 C 级患者出现缺血性结肠炎并需要再次手术。年龄是多因素分析中与灌注等级相关的唯一因素(OR 1.080,95%CI 1.006-1.159,p=0.034)。>65 岁和<65 岁患者的灌注等级有显著差异(>65 岁,A 级 29.2%,B 级 12.5%,C 级 58.3%;<65 岁,A 级 65.4%,B 级 11.5%,C 级 23.1%,p=0.006)。我们术中使用切割方法和视觉分级系统进行灌注评估,这种方法简单且有助于结直肠切除术后进行安全吻合。如果灌注等级优于 C 级,则可以安全进行吻合。年龄是影响灌注等级的一个重要因素。