• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

衡量沙特阿拉伯王国患者对公立与私立医生的信任度

Measuring Patient Trust in Public versus Private Physicians in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).

作者信息

Aljaffary Afnan, AlThumairi Arwa, Almarhoon Lojain, Alsaawi Ghalyah

机构信息

Department of Health Information Management & Technology, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (IAU), Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Jan 26;14:151-159. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S286313. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S286313
PMID:33531813
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7847367/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to assess and compare patient trust in public vs private physicians and to determine the factors that can affect the level of trust in the context of the KSA.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was carried out in the KSA to assess patient trust in physicians. A questionnaire was administered in both Arabic and English to patients above 18 years of age via online channels.

RESULTS

A statistically significant difference was found between the level of trust in public vs private physicians, where the public physicians showed higher patients' trust scores compared to private physicians, where the mean was 2.51 (SD=0.60) and 2.29 (SD=0.56), respectively, -value<0.001. A statistically significant difference was also found between self-assessment health status (SAHS) groups (F(3)=11.429, =0.010). Other factors were not significantly associated.

CONCLUSION

This study found that public physicians engender a higher level of patient trust than private physicians. A further qualitative study should be conducted in the future to investigate the reasons behind the high trust in public physicians in the KSA.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The results of this study open doors for new investigations that might result in the implementation of new interventions to promote patient trust in the healthcare journey in KSA.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估和比较患者对公立医院医生与私立医院医生的信任度,并确定在沙特阿拉伯王国背景下可能影响信任水平的因素。

方法

在沙特阿拉伯王国开展了一项横断面研究,以评估患者对医生的信任度。通过在线渠道,以阿拉伯语和英语向18岁以上的患者发放问卷。

结果

发现患者对公立医院医生与私立医院医生的信任水平存在统计学上的显著差异,公立医院医生的患者信任得分高于私立医院医生,其均值分别为2.51(标准差=0.60)和2.29(标准差=0.56),P值<0.001。自我评估健康状况(SAHS)组之间也存在统计学上的显著差异(F(3)=11.429,P=0.010)。其他因素无显著关联。

结论

本研究发现,公立医院医生比私立医院医生赢得更高水平的患者信任。未来应开展进一步的定性研究,以调查沙特阿拉伯王国患者对公立医院医生高度信任背后的原因。

实践意义

本研究结果为新的调查打开了大门,这些调查可能会导致实施新的干预措施,以促进沙特阿拉伯王国医疗过程中的患者信任。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7eee/7847367/3d62606c7cfc/JMDH-14-151-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7eee/7847367/04f38b08dee9/JMDH-14-151-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7eee/7847367/fead6a5d1a37/JMDH-14-151-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7eee/7847367/3d62606c7cfc/JMDH-14-151-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7eee/7847367/04f38b08dee9/JMDH-14-151-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7eee/7847367/fead6a5d1a37/JMDH-14-151-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7eee/7847367/3d62606c7cfc/JMDH-14-151-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring Patient Trust in Public versus Private Physicians in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).衡量沙特阿拉伯王国患者对公立与私立医生的信任度
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Jan 26;14:151-159. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S286313. eCollection 2021.
2
A pre-experimental pilot study exploring EBP Beliefs and EBP Implementation among post-graduate student nurses in Saudi Arabia.一项探索沙特阿拉伯研究生护士的 EBP 信念和 EBP 实施情况的预实验性试点研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2021 Nov;57:103215. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103215. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
3
Nutrition competence of primary care physicians in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.沙特阿拉伯初级保健医生的营养能力:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 6;10(1):e033443. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033443.
4
Who are more responsive? Mixed-methods comparison of public and private sector physicians in rural Bangladesh.谁的反应更迅速?孟加拉国农村地区公营和私营部门医生的混合方法比较。
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Nov 1;32(suppl_3):iii14-iii24. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx111.
5
Patient Trust in Primary Care Physicians: A Mixed Methods Study of Persons with Diabetes at University- Based Clinics in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia.患者对基层医疗医生的信任:沙特阿拉伯东部省份大学附属医院糖尿病患者的混合方法研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Dec 13;16:3241-3255. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S377500. eCollection 2022.
6
Using the Human Factors Framework to understand the origins of medication safety problems in community pharmacy: A qualitative study.运用人因工程学框架理解社区药房药物安全问题的根源:一项定性研究。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 May;15(5):558-567. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.07.010. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
7
The Effect of Male Physicians' Outfits on the General Population's Perception in Saudi Arabia.男性医生着装对沙特阿拉伯普通民众认知的影响。
Cureus. 2020 Dec 17;12(12):e12131. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12131.
8
The Relationship Between Health-Related Quality of Life and Trust in Primary Care Physicians Among Patients with Diabetes.糖尿病患者的健康相关生活质量与对基层医疗医生的信任之间的关系
Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Feb 5;12:143-151. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S236952. eCollection 2020.
9
Patients' attitudes toward the attire of male physicians: a single-center study in Saudi Arabia.患者对男医生着装的态度:沙特阿拉伯的一项单中心研究。
Ann Saudi Med. 2014 Sep-Oct;34(5):383-9. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2014.383.
10
Attitude of Physicians toward the Use of Erythropoietin in Hemodialysis Patients.医生对血液透析患者使用促红细胞生成素的态度。
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2005 July-September;16(3):298-305.

引用本文的文献

1
Equity and unmet need of non-communicable diseases services in Saudi Arabia using a National Household Survey (2019).沙特阿拉伯利用国家家庭调查(2019 年)评估非传染性疾病服务的公平性和未满足的需求。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 16;24(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10787-6.
2
Rating communication skills in dental practice: the impact of different sociodemographic factors.评价口腔实践中的沟通技巧:不同社会人口因素的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Dec 12;23(1):950. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04958-y.
3
Patient Trust in Primary Care Physicians: A Mixed Methods Study of Persons with Diabetes at University- Based Clinics in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia.

本文引用的文献

1
Medical Students and COVID-19: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Precautionary Measures. A Descriptive Study From Jordan.医学生与 COVID-19:知识、态度和预防措施。来自约旦的描述性研究。
Front Public Health. 2020 May 29;8:253. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00253. eCollection 2020.
2
Knowledge and Perceptions of COVID-19 Among the General Public in the United States and the United Kingdom: A Cross-sectional Online Survey.美国和英国公众对2019冠状病毒病的认知与看法:一项横断面在线调查
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jul 21;173(2):157-160. doi: 10.7326/M20-0912. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
3
Factors associated with the public's trust in physicians in the context of the Lebanese healthcare system: a qualitative study.
患者对基层医疗医生的信任:沙特阿拉伯东部省份大学附属医院糖尿病患者的混合方法研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Dec 13;16:3241-3255. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S377500. eCollection 2022.
4
Patient's Perspective on Factors Affecting Health-Seeking Behavior in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯艾哈萨地区患者对影响就医行为因素的看法。
Cureus. 2022 Oct 8;14(10):e30078. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30078. eCollection 2022 Oct.
5
Current state of ethical challenges reported in Saudi Arabia: a systematic review & bibliometric analysis from 2010 to 2021.沙特阿拉伯报告的伦理挑战现状:2010 年至 2021 年的系统评价和文献计量分析。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Aug 13;23(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00816-6.
6
Doctor-patient communication skills: a survey on knowledge and practice of Iranian family physicians.医患沟通技巧:伊朗家庭医生知识与实践调查。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Jun 24;22(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01491-z.
与黎巴嫩医疗体系下公众对医生信任度相关的因素:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 27;19(1):525. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4354-0.
4
Patient factors that affect trust in physicians: a cross-sectional study.影响患者对医生信任的因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Nov 29;19(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0875-6.
5
Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option?非正态数据:方差分析仍然是一个有效的选择吗?
Psicothema. 2017 Nov;29(4):552-557. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2016.383.
6
Psychometric properties of the Trust in Physician Scale in Tamil Nadu, India.印度泰米尔纳德邦医生信任量表的心理测量特性。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2017 Jan-Mar;6(1):34-38. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.214966.
7
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.理解克朗巴哈系数。
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
8
A qualitative study of patient (dis)trust in public and private hospitals: the importance of choice and pragmatic acceptance for trust considerations in South Australia.一项关于患者对公立和私立医院(不)信任的定性研究:选择和务实接受对南澳大利亚州信任考量的重要性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jul 30;15:297. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0967-0.
9
Patient-physician trust among adults of rural Tamil Nadu: a community-based survey.泰米尔纳德邦农村成年人医患信任情况:一项基于社区的调查。
J Postgrad Med. 2014 Jan-Mar;60(1):21-6. doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.128802.
10
Factors affecting patients' trust and confidence in GPs: evidence from the English national GP patient survey.影响患者对全科医生信任和信心的因素:来自英国国家全科医生患者调查的证据。
BMJ Open. 2013 May 28;3(5):e002762. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002762.