Clinic for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Bad Mergentheim, Germany; Clinic for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Caritas Hospital, Bad Mergentheim, Germany; Department of Hand Surgery, Vulpius Hospital, Bad Rappenau, Germany; Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020 Nov 13;117(46):783-789. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0783.
Dorsally displaced distal radius fractures are generally treated with closed reduction followed by casting. Current evidence suggests that fracture reduction is of no benefit before either conservative or surgical treatment. It has not been studied to date whether the degree of pain suffered by the patient during preoperative casting is any different if the fracture is reduced beforehand.
In a prospective, randomized trial, dorsally displaced unstable distal radius fractures were treated surgically, either with or without prior closed reduction (22 and 25 patients, respectively). The primary endpoint was the difference between the pain score (on the Visual Analog Scale) on day 1 after treatment and the initial pain score on presentation. The secondary endpoints included the clinical and radiological outcome and any damage to the median nerve. Moreover, the Krimmer score (strength, mobility, pain, and function of the wrist joint) an the DASH score (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) were determined 3 and 12 months after treatment. This trial has been registered with the number DRKS00010570.
With regard to the primary endpoint on day 1 after treatment, there was a statistically significant non-inferiority of the group without reduction, compared to the group with reduction. Sensory disturbances appeared at similar frequencies in the two groups four to six weeks after treatment (9.5% with reduction, 9.1% without). At 12 months, the Krimmer and DASH scores of patients whose fractures had not been reduced were no worse than those of patients whose fractures had been reduced (96 and 7 versus 96.5 and 4.5, respectively; p-values for non-inferiority, 0.004 and 0.008).
This trial shows that dispensing with closed reduction before casting as a preliminary to planned surgery yields no disadvantage. Thus, in the authors' view, routine reduction is not warranted.
背侧移位的桡骨远端骨折一般采用闭合复位后再进行石膏固定治疗。目前的证据表明,在保守或手术治疗之前,骨折复位并无益处。迄今为止,尚未研究在术前石膏固定之前是否对骨折进行复位会对患者术前疼痛程度产生任何影响。
在一项前瞻性、随机试验中,对背侧移位不稳定的桡骨远端骨折采用手术治疗,分别采用(分别为 22 例和 25 例患者)或不采用闭合复位。主要终点是治疗后第 1 天的疼痛评分(视觉模拟评分)与就诊时的初始疼痛评分之间的差异。次要终点包括临床和放射学结果以及正中神经损伤情况。此外,还在治疗后 3 个月和 12 个月时确定了 Krimmer 评分(腕关节的力量、活动度、疼痛和功能)和 DASH 评分(手臂、肩部和手部的残疾)。该试验已在 DRKS00010570 注册。
在治疗后第 1 天的主要终点方面,与复位组相比,未复位组在统计学上具有非劣效性。两组在治疗后 4 至 6 周时感觉障碍的发生率相似(复位组为 9.5%,未复位组为 9.1%)。在 12 个月时,未复位骨折患者的 Krimmer 和 DASH 评分并不比复位骨折患者差(分别为 96 和 7 分与 96.5 和 4.5 分;非劣效性的 p 值分别为 0.004 和 0.008)。
本试验表明,在计划手术前不进行闭合复位并不会带来不利影响。因此,作者认为,常规复位没有必要。