Martos-Pérez F, Martín-Escalante M D, Olalla-Sierra J, Prada-Pardal J L, García-de-Lucas M D, González-Vega R, Jiménez-Puente A, García-Alegría J
Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Costa del Sol, Autovía A-7 Km 187, 29603 Marbella, Spain.
Evaluation Department, Hospital Costa del Sol, Autovía A-7 Km 187, 29603 Marbella, Spain.
QJM. 2021 Dec 20;114(10):715-720. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcab024.
Many Spanish hospitals converted scheduled in-person visits to telephone visits during the COVID-19 lockdown. There is scarce information about the performance of those visits.
To compare telephone visits during the COVID-19 lockdown period with previous in-person visits.
Retrospective descriptive study.
Telephone visits from 15 March to 31 May 2020 were compared with in-person visits during the same period in 2019.
The proportions of both groups were compared in term of failure to contact patient, requested diagnostic tests/referrals, discharges, admissions and emergency visits within 30-60 days. A sample of patients, and all participating physicians completed surveys. Z-score test was used (statistical significance P<0.05).
A total of 5602 telephone visits were conducted. In comparison to in-person visits, telephone visits showed higher rates of visit compliance (95.9% vs. 85.2%, P<0.001) and discharges (22.12% vs. 11.82%; P<0.001), and lower number of ancillary tests and referrals. During the 30- and 60-day periods following the telephone visit, a reduction of 52% and 47% in the combined number of emergency department visits and hospital admissions was observed compared to in-person visits (P<0.01). Of the 120 patients surveyed, 95% were satisfied/very satisfied with the telephone visits. Of the 26 physicians, 84.6% considered telephone visits were useful to prioritize patients.
During health emergencies, previously scheduled outpatient in-person visits can be converted to telephone visits, reducing absenteeism, increasing the rate of discharges and reducing ancillary tests and referrals without increasing the rate of hospital admissions or emergency department visits.
在新冠疫情封锁期间,许多西班牙医院将预定的面对面就诊改为电话就诊。关于这些就诊的效果信息稀缺。
比较新冠疫情封锁期间的电话就诊与之前的面对面就诊。
回顾性描述性研究。
将2020年3月15日至5月31日的电话就诊与2019年同期的面对面就诊进行比较。
比较两组在未能联系到患者、30 - 60天内要求的诊断检查/转诊、出院、入院和急诊就诊方面的比例。抽取患者样本并让所有参与的医生完成调查。使用Z分数检验(统计学显著性P<0.05)。
共进行了5602次电话就诊。与面对面就诊相比,电话就诊的就诊依从率更高(95.9%对85.2%,P<0.001)和出院率更高(22.12%对11.82%;P<0.001),且辅助检查和转诊数量更少。在电话就诊后的30天和60天内,与面对面就诊相比,急诊就诊和住院入院的合并数量分别减少了52%和47%(P<0.01)。在接受调查的120名患者中,95%对电话就诊满意/非常满意。在26名医生中,84.6%认为电话就诊有助于对患者进行优先排序。
在突发卫生事件期间,之前预定的门诊面对面就诊可以改为电话就诊,减少缺勤率,提高出院率,减少辅助检查和转诊,且不增加住院入院率或急诊就诊率。