Hadengue A, Lee S S, Koshy A, Girod C, Lebrec D
Unité de Recherches de Physiopathologie Hépatique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U24, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France.
Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1988 Apr;187(4):461-8. doi: 10.3181/00379727-187-42689.
To determine the reproducibility of splanchnic blood flow measurements by the microsphere method in rats with portal hypertension and the effects of laparotomy with portal vein cannulation, eight groups of 10 rats were studied. Cardiac output and regional blood flows were measured twice, 10 min apart, in pentobarbital anesthetized or awake, sham-operated or portal vein-ligated rats, with or without portal cannulation. Variability between the two successive measurements was not affected by portal hypertension or portal cannulation, and was not different in the splanchnic territory and in other organs. Laparotomy with portal cannulation had no significant effect in sham-operated rats. In awake portal hypertensive rats, cardiac output (53.9 +/- 3.0 vs 45.8 +/- 2.9 ml.min-1.100 g body wt-1, P less than 0.01) and splanchnic blood flow (12.31 +/- 0.72 vs 9.34 +/- 0.85 ml.min-1.100 g body wt-1, P less than 0.01) were lower in portal vein cannulated rats compared with those of non-cannulated animals. In anesthetized portal hypertensive rats blood flows were unaffected by portal cannulation, but arterial pressure (100.2 +/- 4.3 vs 119.9 +/- 3.4 mm Hg, P less than 0.01) and heart rate (366.5 +/- 10.0 vs 405.5 +/- 7.4 beats.min-1, P less than 0.01) were elevated. Anesthesia also decreased portal pressure (14.8 +/- 0.5 vs 12.0 +/- 0.4 mm Hg, P less than 0.05) in portal hypertensive rats. We conclude that the microsphere method remains reproducible in portal hypertensive rat models. Laparotomy with portal cannulation can alter systemic and splanchnic hemodynamics in portal hypertensive rats; these effects can also be changed during pentobarbital anesthesia. Regional blood flow measurements in portal hypertensive rats should be performed in animals without portal cannulation and preferably in the awake state.
为了确定微球法测量门静脉高压大鼠内脏血流量的可重复性以及门静脉插管剖腹术的影响,对八组大鼠(每组10只)进行了研究。在戊巴比妥麻醉或清醒、假手术或门静脉结扎的大鼠中,无论有无门静脉插管,均相隔10分钟测量心输出量和局部血流量两次。连续两次测量之间的变异性不受门静脉高压或门静脉插管的影响,在内脏区域和其他器官中也无差异。门静脉插管剖腹术对假手术大鼠无显著影响。在清醒的门静脉高压大鼠中,门静脉插管大鼠的心输出量(53.9±3.0 vs 45.8±2.9 ml·min-1·100 g体重-1,P<0.01)和内脏血流量(12.31±0.72 vs 9.34±0.85 ml·min-1·100 g体重-1,P<0.01)低于未插管动物。在麻醉的门静脉高压大鼠中,血流量不受门静脉插管的影响,但动脉压(100.2±4.3 vs 119.9±3.4 mmHg,P<0.01)和心率(366.5±10.0 vs 405.5±7.4次·min-1,P<0.01)升高。麻醉还降低了门静脉高压大鼠的门静脉压力(14.8±0.5 vs 12.0±0.4 mmHg,P<0.05)。我们得出结论,微球法在门静脉高压大鼠模型中仍具有可重复性。门静脉插管剖腹术可改变门静脉高压大鼠的全身和内脏血流动力学;这些影响在戊巴比妥麻醉期间也会改变。门静脉高压大鼠的局部血流量测量应在无门静脉插管的动物中进行,最好在清醒状态下进行。