• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拒绝的权利:为什么成年性侵患者拒绝医学取证检查和性侵取证包证据采集。

The Right to Say No: Why Adult Sexual Assault Patients Decline Medical Forensic Exams and Sexual Assault Kit Evidence Collection.

机构信息

Author Affiliations:Department of Psychology.

Center for Statistical Training & Consulting, Michigan State University.

出版信息

J Forensic Nurs. 2021;17(1):3-13. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000315.

DOI:10.1097/JFN.0000000000000315
PMID:33534353
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The International Association of Forensic Nurses (2018) affirms the importance of evidence-based, trauma-informed, patient-centered forensic nursing services that engage patients as autonomous decision makers. Past research indicates that forensic nurses consistently respect patients' choices and control as they navigate the decisions of medical forensic examinations (MFEs) and sexual assault kit (SAK) collection. Building on that work, this study examined which options patients decline and what factors are associated with those declination decisions.

METHOD

We collected prospective data from seven state-funded sexual assault nurse examiner programs. Forensic nurses recorded information about all adult sexual assault patients (N = 783) regarding four primary decisions: whether to have a MFE, whether to consent to all parts of the MFE or to decline specific services, whether to have a SAK collected, and whether to release the SAK to law enforcement for forensic DNA testing.

RESULTS

Most patients consented to a MFE (95%), to all parts of the MFE (81%), to SAK collection (99%), and to release the SAK for forensic DNA testing (80%). Younger patients and those with disabilities were more likely to decline some options. Patients who had not disclosed the assault to others before seeking sexual assault nurse examiner care were also more likely to decline a MFE. Whether patients sought post assault care for more health-focused reasons or legally focused reasons was associated with declination decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Healthcare providers should communicate clearly about each step in post assault care and allow patients to decline services as they choose.

摘要

简介

国际法医护士协会(2018 年)肯定了基于证据、创伤知情、以患者为中心的法医护理服务的重要性,这些服务使患者成为自主决策者。过去的研究表明,法医护士在患者进行医疗法医检查(MFE)和性侵犯套件(SAK)采集的决策时,始终尊重患者的选择和控制。在此基础上,本研究探讨了患者拒绝哪些选择,以及哪些因素与这些拒绝决策有关。

方法

我们从七个由州资助的性侵犯护士检查计划中收集了前瞻性数据。法医护士记录了所有成年性侵犯患者(N=783)的信息,包括四个主要决策:是否进行 MFE,是否同意 MFE 的所有部分或拒绝特定服务,是否进行 SAK 采集,以及是否将 SAK 释放给执法部门进行法医 DNA 测试。

结果

大多数患者同意进行 MFE(95%)、同意 MFE 的所有部分(81%)、同意 SAK 采集(99%)和同意将 SAK 释放用于法医 DNA 测试(80%)。年轻患者和残疾患者更有可能拒绝某些选择。在寻求性侵犯护士检查护理之前未向他人透露袭击事件的患者也更有可能拒绝 MFE。患者寻求性侵犯后护理是出于更注重健康的原因还是更注重法律的原因与拒绝决策有关。

结论

医疗保健提供者应清楚地沟通性侵犯后护理的每一步,并允许患者根据自己的选择拒绝服务。

相似文献

1
The Right to Say No: Why Adult Sexual Assault Patients Decline Medical Forensic Exams and Sexual Assault Kit Evidence Collection.拒绝的权利:为什么成年性侵患者拒绝医学取证检查和性侵取证包证据采集。
J Forensic Nurs. 2021;17(1):3-13. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000315.
2
Developing Trauma-Informed Research Methods: Using Proxy Respondents to Assess Sexual Assault Survivors' Experiences Seeking Medical Forensic Exams.发展创伤知情的研究方法:使用代理受访者评估性侵犯幸存者寻求医疗法医检查的经历。
Violence Vict. 2021 Dec 1;36(6):793-807. doi: 10.1891/VV-D-20-00221.
3
Predicting sexual assault kit submission among adolescent rape cases treated in forensic nurse examiner programs.预测在法医护士检查项目中治疗的青少年强奸案件中提交性侵犯工具包的情况。
J Interpers Violence. 2013 Dec;28(18):3400-17. doi: 10.1177/0886260513504496. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
4
Increasing the Accessibility of Sexual Assault Forensic Examinations: Evaluation of Texas Law SB 1191.提高性侵犯法医检查的可及性:对德克萨斯州法律SB 1191的评估
J Forensic Nurs. 2017 Oct/Dec;13(4):168-177. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000169.
5
The problem of untested sexual assault kits: why are some kits never submitted to a crime laboratory?未检测的性侵犯工具包问题:为什么有些工具包从未提交给犯罪实验室?
J Interpers Violence. 2012 Jul;27(11):2259-75. doi: 10.1177/0886260511432155. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
6
Do Concerns About Police Reporting Vary by Assault Characteristics? Understanding the Nonreporting Decisions of Sexual Assault Victims Who Utilize Alternative Reporting Options.对警察报案的担忧是否因攻击特征而异?了解利用替代报案途径的性侵犯受害者的不报案决定。
J Forensic Nurs. 2024;20(3):151-159. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000469. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
7
Supporting sexual assault survivors with disabilities: Tracing disclosure and referral pathways to postassault health care services.为残疾性侵犯幸存者提供支持:追踪性侵后医疗服务的披露和转诊途径。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2021;91(6):751-762. doi: 10.1037/ort0000576. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
8
Providing trans-affirming care for sexual assault survivors: An evaluation of a novel curriculum for forensic nurses.为跨性别性侵幸存者提供支持性护理:法医护士新型课程评估。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Oct;93:104541. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104541. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
9
Justice Denied: Low Submission Rates of Sexual Assault Kits and the Predicting Variables.司法不公:性侵犯工具包低提交率及其预测变量。
J Interpers Violence. 2019 Sep;34(17):3547-3573. doi: 10.1177/0886260516681881. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
10
With care and compassion: adolescent sexual assault victims' experiences in Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner programs.带着关怀与同情:青少年性侵犯受害者在性侵犯护士 examiner 项目中的经历。 (注:这里“examiner”可根据具体语境准确翻译,比如“检查官”等,若结合医学领域,也许是“检查者”等意思,因缺乏更多背景信息,暂保留英文)
J Forensic Nurs. 2013 Apr-Jun;9(2):68-75. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0b013e31828badfa.

引用本文的文献

1
Trauma- and Violence-Informed Empowering Care for Sexual Assault Survivors.创伤和暴力知情的赋能护理:性侵犯幸存者。
J Forensic Nurs. 2024;20(3):166-173. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000483. Epub 2024 Mar 21.