Van Langenberghe H V
University of Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom, Physiology Department, King's College London, University of London, Strand, United Kingdom.
Phys Ther. 1988 Apr;68(4):522-9. doi: 10.1093/ptj/68.4.522.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the approaches to studying of first- and second-year students in a problem-based physical therapy program. The Short Inventory of Approaches to Studying was administered to 112 first-year students (66 female, 46 male) and 100 second-year students (62 female, 38 male). Ninety-nine first-year students and 88 second-year students responded to the inventory, representing a return rate of 88%. The results of both groups were compared. Further comparisons were made with reported normative inventory scores and with inventory results reported of first-year students in a medical problem-based school. All comparisons were made using two-tailed t tests. The inventory scores proved similar in both year groups of physical therapy students and were more desirable than the normative values. The first-year physical therapy students' scores were similar to those of the first-year medical students reported to be desirable. It was concluded that the physical therapy students possess desirable approaches to studying.
本研究的目的是调查基于问题的物理治疗项目中一年级和二年级学生的学习方法。对112名一年级学生（66名女生，46名男生）和100名二年级学生（62名女生，38名男生）进行了《学习方法简短问卷》调查。99名一年级学生和88名二年级学生对问卷进行了回复，回复率为88%。对两组结果进行了比较。还与报告的标准问卷分数以及一所基于问题的医学院校中一年级学生的问卷结果进行了进一步比较。所有比较均使用双侧t检验。结果表明，物理治疗专业两个年级学生的问卷得分相似，且比标准值更理想。一年级物理治疗专业学生的得分与报告的理想状态下一年级医学生的得分相似。得出的结论是，物理治疗专业学生拥有理想的学习方法。
