Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health and Family Planning Commission, Shanghai, China.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Apr;37(4):693-701. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1885362. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral sitafloxacin versus oral moxifloxacin in the treatment of Chinese adults with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).
This is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, positive-controlled clinical trial (chinadrugtrials.org.cn identifier: CTR20130046). CAP patients received sitafloxacin tablets 100 mg once daily (qd) or 100 mg twice daily (bid) to compare with moxifloxacin tablets 400 mg qd, for 7-10 days. The primary outcome was non-inferiority of sitafloxacin to moxifloxacin in clinical cure rate at test of cure (TOC) visit in per-protocol set (PPS).
A total of 343 patients were randomized (sitafloxacin 100 mg qd, = 117; sitafloxacin 100 mg bid, = 116; moxifloxacin, = 110), 291 patients were included in the PPS (sitafloxacin 100 mg qd, = 96; sitafloxacin 100 mg bid, = 94; moxifloxacin, = 101). The clinical cure rate was 94.8% in the sitafloxacin 100 mg qd group, 96.8% in the sitafloxacin 100 mg bid group and 95.0% in the moxifloxacin group. At the TOC visit, the microbiological success rate was 97.0% (32/33) in the sitafloxacin 100 mg qd group, 97.1% (34/35) in the sitafloxacin 100 mg bid group and 94.9% (37/39) in the moxifloxacin group in the microbiological evaluable set (MES). The incidence of study-drug-related adverse events (AEs) was 23.3% (27/116) in the sitafloxacin 100 mg qd group, 29.8% (34/114) in the sitafloxacin 100 mg bid group and 28.2% (31/110) in the moxifloxacin group ( > .05). The common AEs related to study drug were dizziness, nausea, diarrhea, increased platelet count and alanine transaminase (ALT) elevation. All the AEs resolved completely after discontinuation of study drug.
Sitafloxacin 100 mg qd or 100 mg bid for 7-10 days is not inferior to moxifloxacin 400 mg qd for 7-10 days in clinical efficacy for adult CAP patients. Sitafloxacin provides a safety profile comparable to moxifloxacin.
评估口服司帕沙星与莫西沙星治疗中国成人社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的疗效和安全性。
这是一项多中心、随机、开放标签、阳性对照临床试验(chinadrugtrials.org.cn 标识符:CTR20130046)。CAP 患者接受司帕沙星片 100mg 每日 1 次(qd)或 100mg 每日 2 次(bid)与莫西沙星片 400mg qd 比较,疗程 7-10 天。主要疗效终点为意向治疗(TOC)访视时司帕沙星在方案人群(PPS)中的临床治愈率不劣于莫西沙星。
共 343 例患者被随机分组(司帕沙星 100mg qd 组,n=117;司帕沙星 100mg bid 组,n=116;莫西沙星组,n=110),291 例患者纳入 PPS(司帕沙星 100mg qd 组,n=96;司帕沙星 100mg bid 组,n=94;莫西沙星组,n=101)。司帕沙星 100mg qd 组的临床治愈率为 94.8%,司帕沙星 100mg bid 组为 96.8%,莫西沙星组为 95.0%。在 TOC 访视时,司帕沙星 100mg qd 组的微生物学治愈率为 97.0%(32/33),司帕沙星 100mg bid 组为 97.1%(34/35),莫西沙星组为 94.9%(37/39),在微生物学可评价集(MES)中。司帕沙星 100mg qd 组的研究药物相关不良事件(AE)发生率为 23.3%(27/116),司帕沙星 100mg bid 组为 29.8%(34/114),莫西沙星组为 28.2%(31/110)(>0.05)。与研究药物相关的常见 AE 为头晕、恶心、腹泻、血小板计数升高和丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)升高。所有 AE 在停用研究药物后完全缓解。
司帕沙星 100mg qd 或 bid 治疗 7-10 天与莫西沙星 400mg qd 治疗 7-10 天在成人 CAP 患者的临床疗效方面不劣于莫西沙星。司帕沙星提供了与莫西沙星相当的安全性。