Kunzler Angela M, Stoffers-Winterling Jutta, Stoll Marlene, Mancini Alexander L, Lehmann Sophie, Blessin Manpreet, Gilan Donya, Helmreich Isabella, Hufert Frank, Lieb Klaus
Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 3;16(2):e0244748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244748. eCollection 2021.
Acute disease outbreaks such as the COVID-19 pandemic cause a high burden of psychological distress in people worldwide. Interventions to enable people to better cope with such distress should be based on the best available evidence. We therefore performed a scoping review to systematically identify and summarize the available literature of interventions that target the distress of people in the face of highly contagious disease outbreaks.
MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science (January 2000 to May 7, 2020), and reference lists were systematically searched and screened by two independent reviewers. Quantitative and qualitative studies investigating the effects of psychological interventions before, during, and after outbreaks of highly contagious emerging infectious diseases, such as SARS, MERS, Ebola, or COVID-19 were included. Study effects were grouped (e.g. for healthcare professionals, community members, people at risk) and intervention contents at the individual and organizational level summarized. We assessed the level of evidence using a modified scheme from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.
Of 4030 records found, 19 studies were included (two RCTs). Most interventions were delivered during-exposure and face-to-face, focused on healthcare workers and crisis personnel, and combined psychoeducation with training of coping strategies. Based on two high-quality studies, beneficial effects were reported for resilience factors (e.g. positive cognitive appraisal) and professional attitudes of healthcare workers, with mixed findings for mental health (e.g. depression). Across all studies, there was positive qualitative feedback from participants and facilitators. We identified seven ongoing studies mostly using online- and mobile-based deliveries.
There is preliminary evidence for beneficial effects of interventions to enable people to better cope with the distress of highly contagious emerging disease outbreaks. Besides the need for more high-quality studies, the summarized evidence may inform decision makers to plan interventions during the current pandemic and to develop pandemic preparedness plans.
诸如新冠疫情这样的急性疾病爆发给全球各地的人们带来了沉重的心理压力负担。使人们能够更好应对此类压力的干预措施应以现有最佳证据为基础。因此,我们进行了一项范围综述,以系统地识别和总结针对面对高传染性疾病爆发时人们的心理压力的现有干预措施文献。
由两名独立评审员对MEDLINE、Cochrane CENTRAL、科学网(2000年1月至2020年5月7日)以及参考文献列表进行系统检索和筛选。纳入了调查在严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)、中东呼吸综合征(MERS)、埃博拉或新冠等高度传染性新发传染病爆发之前、期间和之后心理干预效果的定量和定性研究。对研究效果进行分组(例如针对医护人员、社区成员、高危人群),并总结个体和组织层面的干预内容。我们使用牛津循证医学中心和澳大利亚国家卫生与医学研究委员会的改良方案评估证据水平。
在检索到的4030条记录中,纳入了19项研究(两项随机对照试验)。大多数干预措施是在接触期间进行的且为面对面形式,主要针对医护人员和危机处理人员,并将心理教育与应对策略培训相结合。基于两项高质量研究,报告了对医护人员复原力因素(如积极的认知评估)和专业态度有有益影响,而对心理健康(如抑郁)的研究结果不一。在所有研究中,参与者和干预实施者都给出了积极的定性反馈。我们确定了七项正在进行的研究,大多采用基于网络和移动设备的方式。
有初步证据表明干预措施能使人们更好地应对高传染性新发疾病爆发带来的心理压力,具有有益效果。除了需要更多高质量研究外,总结出的证据可为决策者在当前疫情期间规划干预措施以及制定疫情防范计划提供参考。