• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲癌症药物定价的潜在方法,以提高医疗保健系统的可持续性及其影响。

Potential approaches for the pricing of cancer medicines across Europe to enhance the sustainability of healthcare systems and the implications.

机构信息

Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Aug;21(4):527-540. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1884546. Epub 2021 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1080/14737167.2021.1884546
PMID:33535841
Abstract

: There are growing concerns among European health authorities regarding increasing prices for new cancer medicines, prices not necessarily linked to health gain and the implications for the sustainability of their healthcare systems.: Narrative discussion principally among payers and their advisers regarding potential approaches to the pricing of new cancer medicines.: A number of potential pricing approaches are discussed including minimum effectiveness levels for new cancer medicines, managed entry agreements, multicriteria decision analyses (MCDAs), differential/tiered pricing, fair pricing models, amortization models as well as de-linkage models. We are likely to see a growth in alternative pricing deliberations in view of ongoing challenges. These include the considerable number of new oncology medicines in development including new gene therapies, new oncology medicines being launched with uncertainty regarding their value, and continued high prices coupled with the extent of confidential discounts for reimbursement. However, balanced against the need for new cancer medicines. This will lead to greater scrutiny over the prices of patent oncology medicines as more standard medicines lose their patent, calls for greater transparency as well as new models including amortization models. We will be monitoring these developments.

摘要

欧洲卫生当局越来越关注新癌症药物的价格上涨问题,这些价格不一定与健康收益挂钩,也对其医疗保健系统的可持续性产生影响。

主要是在支付方及其顾问之间就新癌症药物定价的潜在方法进行了叙述性讨论。

讨论了许多潜在的定价方法,包括新癌症药物的最低疗效水平、管理准入协议、多标准决策分析 (MCDA)、差异化/分层定价、公平定价模型、摊销模型以及脱钩模型。鉴于持续存在的挑战,我们可能会看到更多替代定价审议的增长。这些挑战包括正在开发的大量新型肿瘤学药物,包括新的基因疗法、新的肿瘤学药物在推出时其价值存在不确定性,以及持续的高价加上为报销而提供的保密折扣的程度。然而,需要平衡新癌症药物的需求。这将导致对专利肿瘤学药物价格的更严格审查,因为更多标准药物失去专利,需要更大的透明度以及包括摊销模型在内的新模型。我们将监测这些发展。

相似文献

1
Potential approaches for the pricing of cancer medicines across Europe to enhance the sustainability of healthcare systems and the implications.欧洲癌症药物定价的潜在方法,以提高医疗保健系统的可持续性及其影响。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Aug;21(4):527-540. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1884546. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
2
[Risk sharing methods in middle income countries].[中等收入国家的风险分担方法]
Acta Pharm Hung. 2012;82(1):43-52.
3
Assessing the pricing and benefits of oncology products: an update.评估肿瘤学产品的定价和收益:更新。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Jun;21(3):335-342. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1926987. Epub 2021 May 25.
4
Barriers for Access to New Medicines: Searching for the Balance Between Rising Costs and Limited Budgets.获取新药的障碍:探寻成本上升与预算有限之间的平衡
Front Public Health. 2018 Dec 5;6:328. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00328. eCollection 2018.
5
How Can Pricing and Reimbursement Policies Improve Affordable Access to Medicines? Lessons Learned from European Countries.定价与报销政策如何提高药品的可及性?从欧洲国家汲取的经验教训。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017 Jun;15(3):307-321. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0300-z.
6
Medicine price transparency and confidential managed-entry agreements in Europe: findings from the EURIPID survey.欧洲的药品价格透明度与保密的准入管理协议:EURIPID 调查结果
Health Policy. 2021 Sep;125(9):1140-1145. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.06.008. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
7
Price comparison of high-cost originator medicines in European countries.欧洲国家高成本原研药的价格比较。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Apr;17(2):221-230. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2016.1223543. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
8
Pricing and Reimbursement of Patent-Protected Medicines: Challenges and Lessons from South-Eastern Europe.专利保护药品的定价和报销:东南欧的挑战和经验教训。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021 Nov;19(6):915-927. doi: 10.1007/s40258-021-00678-w. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
9
New pricing models for generic medicines to ensure long-term sustainable competition in Europe.确保欧洲长期可持续竞争的仿制药新定价模式。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Oct 9;14:1200641. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1200641. eCollection 2023.
10
Drug pricing and value in oncology.肿瘤学中的药物定价和价值。
Oncologist. 2010;15 Suppl 1:24-31. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-S1-24.

引用本文的文献

1
Introduction of Biopharmaceuticals in Europe: A Cross-Sectional Study of Early Diffusion Patterns and Data Availability.欧洲生物制药的引入:早期扩散模式与数据可用性的横断面研究
BioDrugs. 2025 Aug 8. doi: 10.1007/s40259-025-00732-2.
2
Value-Based Healthcare in Practice: IDEATE, a Collaboration to Design and Test an Outcomes-Based Agreement for a Medicine in Wales.实践中的价值医疗:IDEATE,一项为威尔士一种药物设计并测试基于结果的协议的合作。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Feb;43(2):191-207. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01445-0. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
3
Drug pricing models, no 'one-size-fits-all' approach: a systematic review and critical evaluation of pricing models in an evolving pharmaceutical landscape.
药品定价模式,不存在“一刀切”的方法:对不断演变的制药格局中定价模式的系统评价与批判性评估
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Nov 4. doi: 10.1007/s10198-024-01731-w.
4
Uptake of biosimilars in China: a retrospective analysis of the case of trastuzumab from 2018 to 2023.生物类似药在中国的应用:2018 年至 2023 年曲妥珠单抗案例的回顾性分析。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2024 Oct 5;9(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s41256-024-00372-z.
5
Access to innovative anticancer medicines in China: a national survey on availability, price and affordability.中国获得创新抗癌药物的情况:一项关于供应、价格和可负担性的全国性调查。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 25;14(4):e077089. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077089.
6
Applying a cost-based pricing model for innovative cancer treatments subject to indication expansion: A case study for pembrolizumab and daratumumab.应用基于成本的定价模型对适应症扩展的创新癌症治疗方法进行定价:以 pembrolizumab 和 daratumumab 为例。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 1;19(2):e0293264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293264. eCollection 2024.
7
Emicizumab prophylaxis for people with hemophilia A: Waste estimation and the Brazilian perspective.用于A型血友病患者的艾美赛珠单抗预防治疗:浪费估计及巴西视角
Saudi Pharm J. 2023 Dec;31(12):101867. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2023.101867. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
8
Reporting reimbursement price decisions for onco-hematology drugs in Spain.报告西班牙肿瘤血液学药物的报销价格决策。
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 24;11:1265323. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1265323. eCollection 2023.
9
Characteristics of clinician input in Canadian funding decisions for cancer drugs: a cross-sectional study based on CADTH reimbursement recommendations.加拿大癌症药物资助决策中临床医生投入的特点:基于 CADTH 报销建议的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 16;13(10):e066378. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066378.
10
Real-World Clinical Outcomes of Bevacizumab-awwb Biosimilar versus Bevacizumab Reference Product in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.贝伐珠单抗生物类似药与转移性结直肠癌患者贝伐珠单抗参比制剂的真实世界临床结局比较。
BioDrugs. 2023 Nov;37(6):891-899. doi: 10.1007/s40259-023-00624-3. Epub 2023 Sep 25.