Suppr超能文献

扭矩与感知用力水平的关系受脊髓损伤男性运动类型的影响。

The Torque Referenced to a Perceived Exertion Level Is Affected by the Type of Movement in Men With Spinal Cord Injury.

机构信息

SARAH Network of Rehabilitation Hospitals, Brasilia, Brazil.

School of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Campo Grande, Brazil.

出版信息

Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2020;26(4):314-323. doi: 10.46292/sci19-00057. Epub 2021 Jan 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare a standardized submaximal intensity (based on the rate of perceived exertion [RPE]) with the percentage of the average and peak torque during a familiarization session in individuals with different spinal cord injury (SCI) levels in gravity-resisted and gravity-assisted movements.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study at a rehabilitation hospital. Thirty-six individuals stratified in tetraplegia (TP), high paraplegia (HP), and low paraplegia (LP) groups and 12 matched control participants (CG) were enrolled in the study. Participants performed a maximum strength test using isokinetic dynamometry. The familiarization consisted of 10 submaximal repetitions with a level 2 (i.e., 20% of the maximum score) in the Resistance Exercise Scale (OMNI-RES). Fisher's exact test compared the percentages of the average torque (%AT) and peak torque (%PT) of the familiarization (based on the peak torque during the maximum strength tests) to the %AT and %PT attained with 20% of RPE. The coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated to assess the torque dispersion during each familiarization set.

RESULTS

The %AT was lower for gravity-assisted compared to gravity-resisted movements for HP, LP, and CG ( ≤ .05). The CV was significantly lower in gravity-resisted movements during familiarization for TP, LP, and CG.

CONCLUSION

Different RPE levels should be adopted for gravity-resisted or gravity-assisted upper limb exercises to maintain the same relative intensity during a familiarization session.

摘要

目的

比较基于感知用力(RPE)的标准化亚极限强度与在熟悉阶段中,不同脊髓损伤(SCI)水平个体在抗重力和助力运动中平均和峰值扭矩的百分比。

方法

这是一家康复医院的横断面研究。36 名四肢瘫(TP)、高截瘫(HP)和低截瘫(LP)患者分为组,12 名匹配的对照组(CG)参与者被纳入研究。参与者使用等速测力计进行最大力量测试。熟悉阶段包括在阻力运动量表(OMNI-RES)中使用 2 级(即最大得分的 20%)进行 10 次亚极限重复。Fisher 精确检验比较了熟悉阶段(基于最大力量测试中的峰值扭矩)的平均扭矩百分比(%AT)和峰值扭矩百分比(%PT)与 20%RPE 时达到的%AT 和%PT。变异系数(CV)用于评估每个熟悉阶段的扭矩离散度。

结果

与抗重力运动相比,HP、LP 和 CG 的助力运动的%AT 较低(≤.05)。TP、LP 和 CG 的抗重力运动的 CV 在熟悉阶段明显较低。

结论

为了在熟悉阶段保持相同的相对强度,应针对抗重力或助力上肢运动采用不同的 RPE 水平。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

8
The rating of perceived exertion during competitive running scales with time.竞技跑步过程中自感用力度的评级随时间变化。
Psychophysiology. 2008 Nov;45(6):977-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00712.x. Epub 2008 Sep 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验