SARAH Network of Rehabilitation Hospitals, Brasilia, Brazil.
School of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Campo Grande, Brazil.
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2020;26(4):314-323. doi: 10.46292/sci19-00057. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
To compare a standardized submaximal intensity (based on the rate of perceived exertion [RPE]) with the percentage of the average and peak torque during a familiarization session in individuals with different spinal cord injury (SCI) levels in gravity-resisted and gravity-assisted movements.
This was a cross-sectional study at a rehabilitation hospital. Thirty-six individuals stratified in tetraplegia (TP), high paraplegia (HP), and low paraplegia (LP) groups and 12 matched control participants (CG) were enrolled in the study. Participants performed a maximum strength test using isokinetic dynamometry. The familiarization consisted of 10 submaximal repetitions with a level 2 (i.e., 20% of the maximum score) in the Resistance Exercise Scale (OMNI-RES). Fisher's exact test compared the percentages of the average torque (%AT) and peak torque (%PT) of the familiarization (based on the peak torque during the maximum strength tests) to the %AT and %PT attained with 20% of RPE. The coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated to assess the torque dispersion during each familiarization set.
The %AT was lower for gravity-assisted compared to gravity-resisted movements for HP, LP, and CG ( ≤ .05). The CV was significantly lower in gravity-resisted movements during familiarization for TP, LP, and CG.
Different RPE levels should be adopted for gravity-resisted or gravity-assisted upper limb exercises to maintain the same relative intensity during a familiarization session.
比较基于感知用力(RPE)的标准化亚极限强度与在熟悉阶段中,不同脊髓损伤(SCI)水平个体在抗重力和助力运动中平均和峰值扭矩的百分比。
这是一家康复医院的横断面研究。36 名四肢瘫(TP)、高截瘫(HP)和低截瘫(LP)患者分为组,12 名匹配的对照组(CG)参与者被纳入研究。参与者使用等速测力计进行最大力量测试。熟悉阶段包括在阻力运动量表(OMNI-RES)中使用 2 级(即最大得分的 20%)进行 10 次亚极限重复。Fisher 精确检验比较了熟悉阶段(基于最大力量测试中的峰值扭矩)的平均扭矩百分比(%AT)和峰值扭矩百分比(%PT)与 20%RPE 时达到的%AT 和%PT。变异系数(CV)用于评估每个熟悉阶段的扭矩离散度。
与抗重力运动相比,HP、LP 和 CG 的助力运动的%AT 较低(≤.05)。TP、LP 和 CG 的抗重力运动的 CV 在熟悉阶段明显较低。
为了在熟悉阶段保持相同的相对强度,应针对抗重力或助力上肢运动采用不同的 RPE 水平。