1Department of Health, Physical Education, and Recreation, Missouri Western State University, St. Joseph, Missouri; and 2Department of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, University of North Alabama, Florence, Alabama.
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Feb;28(2):540-5. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31829b569c.
Session ratings of perceived exertion (SRPE) during resistance training may be influenced by specific exercise parameters. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of work rate (total work per unit time) and recording time on SRPE. Participants performed 3 exercise bouts of bench press, lat pull-down, overhead press, upright row, triceps extension, and biceps curl at 60% of predetermined 1 repetition maximum according to these protocols: (a) 3 sets × 8 repetitions (reps) × 1.5 minutes of recovery, (b) 3 sets × 8 reps × 3 minutes of recovery, and (c) 2 sets × 12 reps × 3 minutes of recovery. Session ratings of perceived exertion for the 3 × 8 × 1.5-minute recovery (5.3 ± 1.8) and 2 × 12 × 3-minute recovery trials (6.2 ± 1.7) were significantly greater vs. 3 × 8 × 3-minute recovery trial (4.2 ± 1.8). The difference approached significance between work rate-matched protocols (p = 0.08). No difference was observed between SRPE at 15 minutes (5.1 ± 1.8) vs. 30 minutes (5.2 ± 1.9) post exercise. Post-set in-task ratings of perceived exertion were higher for the 2 × 12 × 3-minute recovery trial (5.9 ± 1.4) vs. 3 × 8 × 1.5-minute recovery trial (4.8 ± 1.2) and 3 × 8 × 3-minute recovery trial (4.0 ± 1.6). The difference approached significance (p = 0.07) for the 3 × 8 × 3-minute recovery trial vs. 3 × 8 × 1.5-minute recovery trial. Session ratings of perceived exertion responded to changes in work rate with no significant difference at matched work rates, indicating that SRPE is responsive to training load. Results indicated that more proximal monitoring (15 minutes post exercise) yielded reliable estimates of SRPE increasing the practical utility of the measure.
在阻力训练期间,感知用力程度的会话评分(SRPE)可能会受到特定运动参数的影响。本研究的目的是检查工作率(单位时间内的总工作量)和记录时间对 SRPE 的影响。参与者根据以下方案进行 3 次卧推、下拉、过顶推举、直立划船、三头肌伸展和二头肌弯举练习:(a)3 组×8 次重复(重复)×1.5 分钟恢复期,(b)3 组×8 次重复×3 分钟恢复期,和(c)2 组×12 次重复×3 分钟恢复期。3×8×1.5 分钟恢复期的会话感知用力程度评分(5.3±1.8)和 2×12×3 分钟恢复期的试验(6.2±1.7)显著大于 3×8×3 分钟恢复期的试验(4.2±1.8)。在工作率匹配的方案之间,差异接近显著(p=0.08)。运动后 15 分钟(5.1±1.8)和 30 分钟(5.2±1.9)的 SRPE 之间没有差异。后一组内任务感知用力程度评分在 2×12×3 分钟恢复期试验中更高(5.9±1.4)与 3×8×1.5 分钟恢复期试验(4.8±1.2)和 3×8×3 分钟恢复期试验(4.0±1.6)。对于 3×8×3 分钟恢复期试验与 3×8×1.5 分钟恢复期试验,差异接近显著(p=0.07)。SRPE 对工作率的变化有反应,在匹配的工作率下没有显著差异,这表明 SRPE 对训练负荷有反应。结果表明,更接近运动后的近端监测(运动后 15 分钟)可以可靠地估计 SRPE,从而提高该测量的实际效用。