Caesarean section epidemic: Tackling the rise of unnecessary cuts.
作者信息
Josi Renata
机构信息
University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI), Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, Manno, Switzerland.
出版信息
Eur J Midwifery. 2019 Mar 26;3:6. doi: 10.18332/ejm/105892. eCollection 2019.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Caesarean section epidemic: Tackling the rise of unnecessary cuts.剖宫产流行：应对不必要手术的增加
Eur J Midwifery. 2019 Mar 26;3:6. doi: 10.18332/ejm/105892. eCollection 2019.
2
Change in primary midwife-led care in the Netherlands in 2000-2008: a descriptive study of caesarean sections and other interventions among 789,795 low risk births.2000 - 2008年荷兰初级助产士主导护理的变化：对789,795例低风险分娩中剖宫产及其他干预措施的描述性研究。
Midwifery. 2014 May;30(5):560-6. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.06.013. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
3
Change in primary midwife-led care in the Netherlands in 2000–2008: A descriptive study of caesarean sections and other interventions among 807,437 low-risk births.2000 - 2008年荷兰初级助产士主导护理的变化：对807437例低风险分娩中的剖宫产及其他干预措施的描述性研究。
Midwifery. 2015 Jun;31(6):648-54. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.01.013.
4
Comparison of midwife-led and obstetrician-led care in Lithuania: A retrospective cohort study.立陶宛助产士主导护理与产科医生主导护理的比较：一项回顾性队列研究。
Midwifery. 2018 Oct;65:67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.06.017. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
5
Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.减少不必要剖宫产的非临床干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jun 15(6):CD005528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005528.pub2.
6
Rising Rates of Caesarean Section in Urban Nepal.尼泊尔城市剖宫产率上升
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2019 Jan 28;16(41):479-480.
7
A cost effectiveness analysis of midwife psycho-education for fearful pregnant women - a health system perspective for the antenatal period.从卫生系统角度看，对恐惧孕妇进行助产士心理教育的成本效益分析——孕期视角
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jul 11;17(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1404-7.
8
Health system factors and caesarean sections in Kosovo: a cross-sectional study.科索沃的卫生系统因素与剖宫产：一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 11;9(4):e026702. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026702.
9
Caesarean Sections in Beijing, China - Results from a Descriptive Study.中国北京的剖宫产——一项描述性研究的结果
Gesundheitswesen. 2016 Jan;78(1):e1-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1549937. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
10
[Caesarean section and anal incontinence].[剖宫产与肛门失禁]
Ceska Gynekol. 2008 Apr;73(2):112-8.
引用本文的文献
1
Perioperative Analgesia and Patients' Satisfaction in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Fentanyl Versus Morphine.剖宫产脊髓麻醉中的围手术期镇痛与患者满意度：芬太尼与吗啡的比较
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 3;12(19):6346. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196346.
2
Epidemiology of emergency and elective caesarean section and its association with early neonatal mortality in sub-Saharan African countries.撒哈拉以南非洲国家急诊和择期剖宫产的流行病学及其与新生儿早期死亡率的关系。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 12;13(10):e074995. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074995.
本文引用的文献
1
Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies.减少健康妇女和婴儿不必要剖宫产的干预措施。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1358-1368. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31927-5.
2
Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections.全球剖宫产使用情况及差异的流行病学研究。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1341-1348. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7.
3
High prevalence of cesarean section births in private sector health facilities- analysis of district level household survey-4 (DLHS-4) of India.私营部门医疗机构剖宫产率较高——印度第四次地区层面家庭调查（DLHS-4）分析。
BMC Public Health. 2018 May 10;18(1):613. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5533-3.
4
Within country inequalities in caesarean section rates: observational study of 72 low and middle income countries.剖宫产率的国内不平等现象：对72个低收入和中等收入国家的观察性研究
BMJ. 2018 Jan 24;360:k55. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k55.
5
A ten-year study of midwife-led care at an Austrian tertiary care center: a retrospective analysis with special consideration of perineal trauma.一项针对奥地利一所三级护理中心的助产士主导护理的十年研究：一项回顾性分析，特别考虑了会阴创伤。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Oct 16;17(1):357. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1544-9.
6
Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women.由助产士主导的连续性照护模式与针对孕产妇的其他照护模式的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 21(8):CD004667. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub3.
7
Change in primary midwife-led care in the Netherlands in 2000-2008: a descriptive study of caesarean sections and other interventions among 789,795 low risk births.2000 - 2008年荷兰初级助产士主导护理的变化：对789,795例低风险分娩中剖宫产及其他干预措施的描述性研究。
Midwifery. 2014 May;30(5):560-6. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.06.013. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
8
Rates of obstetric intervention among low-risk women giving birth in private and public hospitals in NSW: a population-based descriptive study.新南威尔士州私立和公立医院中低风险产妇的产科干预率：一项基于人群的描述性研究。
BMJ Open. 2012 Sep 10;2(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001723. Print 2012.
9
Risk factors for cesarean section by category of health service.按卫生服务类别分类的剖宫产术风险因素。
Rev Saude Publica. 2010 Feb;44(1):80-9. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102010000100009.
Zotero 插件